I bet it’s going to be just another “nudge” normalizing small restrictions, increased bureaucracy, and taxes. Frog in a boiling pot of water approach. You won’t like it, but most everyone will just comply. Look at the number of people still wearing masks. We are at week 56 of 2 weeks to flatten the curve.
As long as people get their paychecks and food, no meaningful group of people will fight.
Wrong. It is used in financial fraud NOT ELECTION FRAUD. Do you know how it works? Did you watch the video and the paper that I linked to? Since our votes across the country are mostly cast in precincts with only a few thousand voters per, you will get anomalies. These anomalies do not mean that anything nefarious occurred. The test misleads you to believe so.
Fraud happened, Trump is prez, but using Benfords law to prove or point towards the likely hood of fraud is stupid. That’s all I’m saying.
Jeesus. Do some fucking research.
Does your wife's boyfriend also help you jerk off too?
Edit:
Its a BAD tool to use. Just wipe it from your memory. Benford's law is a poor tool to use, detect, screen, find, sniff, locate, for election fraud.
Man, with all that mental masturbation going on, im surprised you havent rubbed your brain smooth.. maybe you have.
I bet you got the full stimulus, and didn't even have the ware-withal to not even use it, because that would make you no different than the neck beards screaming for UBI.
Go fuckyourself.
Just a small amount of intellectual curiosity will help you out.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etx0k1nLn78
Now shoo, you smoothbrain.
Did I ever say that the info-graphic is wrong because Benford's law is included? Including it makes us look dumb when you include erroneous "proof" and start spreading this thing far and wide. It is a bad tool to use when analyzing data sets for election fraud. Just stop using it as proof unless you know exactly where the data is coming from.
file:///C:/Users/92sag/AppData/Local/Temp/benfords-law-and-the-detection-of-election-fraud.pdf
Benfords law is a bad tool for looking into election fraud. The tool is not "designed" to be used in that manner. You have to be very careful in using the tool, to make sure the data set from precincts, and counties has multiple orders of magnitude, which they typically don't. I'm not saying that it cant successfully find it, which it could, but its best to leave this tool out of the equation when many papers on this subject point to Benford's law and election fraud to be "problematic".
file:///C:/Users/92sag/AppData/Local/Temp/benfords-law-and-the-detection-of-election-fraud.pdf
Its a good tool when the datasets satisfies one of the largest requirements; Multiple orders of magnitude. Which many precincts don't.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etx0k1nLn78
This guy lays it out pretty well. In order to use it, you have to do what this guy did, and look at every precinct and understand where the data is coming from. Typically people just apply it liberally.
I just think its best to not include it because the tool really isn't "designed" to be used for elections.
I'm not an apologist. Benford's law is not a tell-all and should not be used without looking at the individual data sets themselves. Its a good tool when used appropriately, but most people just apply it without knowing how the law works. Do some research.
Its just best to leave off of these info-graphics because you want these things to be factual and to the poiint.
its on these info graphics as a tell-all. Many people think you can apply this as a blanket litmus test, which you cannot. If we remember just a mere 5 months ago, Benfords law was posted front page for weeks as a direct link to fraud. It can point to fraud, but only in very specific circumstances. It should just plain be avoided. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etx0k1nLn78
https://youtu.be/etx0k1nLn78 . Watch this guy. He gives a pretty un biased and mathematical approach to why it should not be used. At least, you should be VERY careful before applying the law. It cannot be used as a blanket litmus test.
We already do this. It’s called foreign aid, people.