There's a bit of a chicken and the egg here, as far as the question whether NAMBLA grew out of the gay movement or gay movement grew out of NAMBLA. Though I concede your point that the problem of "liking 'em young" is far more prevalent in the gay male community and is not given anywhere nearly enough opposition - which undermines the cause of the movement and reinforces stereotypes that gay men try to defeat.
Still, restricting the freedoms of those who don't do anything wrong because of the actions of those who abuse the same freedoms is unacceptable in a free society. The same principle could be applied to a great many things outside of sexual preference and before you know it, you live under the rule of the moral busybodies again.
Gays sabotaged themselves when they appended "T" to LGB. Freedom to love whomever you love, and fuck whomever you fuck in the fashion that you both can consent to is quintessential in a free society. Nobody has the right to police what consenting adults do in the privacy of their bedrooms. One is free to judge it disgusting, objectionable, immoral even, but there cannot be repercussions for it aside from personal disassociation. I would go as far as to support workplace protections for homosexuals - you cannot fire someone for a capricious reason that stems from an intensely private activity any more than you can walk into someone's bedroom and tell them to stop doing what they are doing.
But adding traps to the movement endorsed explicit insanity. Men are not women and women are not men. No amount of surgery or hormones changes that. If you say otherwise, you accept insanity. And once you do, all bets are off. Because in the insane world, no rules exist and nothing is off limits.
Backlash is inevitable, and it will be violent. Pedophilia will not fly in the mainstream, because every child has a parent, and with some exceptions, at some point the animal instincts to protect your offspring WILL kick in. And once the backlash starts, it will sweep away all the gains that homosexuals have made and then some.
Because they allowed the insane to hijack their movement.
Fucking worthless criminal junkie died a worthless criminal's junkie's death and was buried in a golden coffin while the country burned.
Meanwhile a kid got his brains blown out on his lawn and nothing.
Nah. She's a feminist through and through. She'll sit at home and seethe, but she's never going to see the light.
Which is better than her voting for Slow Joe, I suppose.
On the upside she can go back to surfing and being irrelevant.
And he doesn't have her only redeeming quality: nice tits.
His shirt should say "I CAN'T WIN" with the subtitle "Fake Noose Matters"
It looks good, but it's not as reliable or safe as it should be for transporting the President.
All you have to do is take one punch for it to become self-defense. After which you can tie her into a pretzel. Unless you're a glass jaw, I doubt she could muster enough of a swing to even produce a bruise.
Sundance, where pedos, freaks and feminists hand each other awards for being pedos, freaks and feminists.
Things will need to get much, much worse before that can happen because right now, sadly, optics still matter.
There is a mosque in my neighborhood. Sure, they call themselves a "cultural center", but that's what they are. Their website claims that they are "progressive" and "integrated", which, I suppose, means that they don't stone their women if they don't wear the whole garbage bag ninja outfit. Construction has been going on there for the past couple months. They are clearly fortifying. I saw grates being added to the windows, there are trucks coming and going at all hours of day and night, and antifa types popping in and out. Now of course, maybe the antifa types found themselves a new religion on the account of easily-accessible goats, and the trucks are bringing catering, but somehow I doubt it. They are getting ready to go. This is a suburb. If I had to guess where the staging area is going to be for the riots on November 3rd, I would only need one guess.
And no questions are being asked. NONE. If a fortified compound with a Gadsden flag suddenly popped up in the same area, there would be screeching Karens at every public meeting, and cops would be knocking on doors. And maybe that wouldn't be a bad thing either - I live in my suburb so I can have my house, my quiet garden and my fruit trees, I have a tall fence so I can be left the fuck alone, and if anybody of any stripe wishes to play cowboys vs. indians with live ammo, would they kindly fuck off and do it elsewhere. But there's no concern at all, because instead of the Gadsden flag there's the moon demon symbol, and we must respect that, now mustn't we.
coughBULLSHITcough
When your 3d lolis are too much for the biggest shithole on the Internet.
Billie Eilish is the closest you can get to seeing what an animated pile of hangover puke looks, acts and sounds like.
Could not have happened to a nicer cunt.
Goodyear can cock off. There are better tires out there.
Same applies to the nerdsphere.
"Hair too long, not enough penis, banned" - politicshumor mod, probably.
But it's OK that anywhere you go these days you see the model family of a mommy in a trashbag ninja outfit with a pregnant belly out to there, the daddy who still stinks of the last goat he fucked, and the brood of out-of-control kiddies that are being taught every day to hate the infidel.
Perfectly fine.
Here's the deal: I have to be at least one of the best part of my job, but it's not a big one and now I have to go!
(This post brought to you by the Autocorrect Joe Biden Quote Method).
You're a lying dog-face pony soldier! You wanna do push ups?
Whyyyy do I always miss the good troll posts whyyyy
Nah. That's mixing secular and religious morality (or secular and spiritual if you will). Nothing good ever comes of it.
On the religious side of things I fully support any church's or religion steadfast refusal to marry gays or even admit gays, for whatever reason they choose. Freedom of religion is also essential.
On the secular side of things, I'd be tempted to say that government does not belong in the business of marriage altogether, but that is naive at best. A marriage is a codified legal construct that constitutes a bond and a contract, and there are legal obligations and remedies within its framework. A lot of it has to do with property and the married parties' mutual conduct, and only a portion has to do with raising of children. Nothing stipulates the necessity of children, however, for the marriage to exist. And to get the government out of marriage, the entire legal concept would need to be unwound first, and ain't nobody got time for that.
And given the above, there is no reason why two consenting adults of the same gender cannot enter into the same legal contract that two consenting adults of opposite genders can. Everyone is equal under the law. Prohibiting two gays from entering a legal contract with one another simply because they are gay is capricious, unnecessarily biased and therefore unacceptable.