ow that everyone is familiar with the term moot, understand voting will prove nothing.
nancy showed herself more capable of rigging elections than hillary anyway.
to find out who’s more evil, lets see what the science says.
science: “white people are evil”.
is there a peter griffin meme that can help us science?
i’m tired of politicians even being able to fuck around with our foundational documents.
there’s nothing they won’t attempt to undo. there’s no “settled law” or double jeopardy type rules. the second they lie, cheat, or steal their way into power they’re like “guess i’ll go back to ignoring words like ‘shall not’ again; guess we’ll go back to being treasonous cunts again.”
the only thing that’s changed about the party of slavery and control is the addition of this fucking circus that gets crazier each year.
they forgot the decimal again?
rabid, and not wearing triple muzzles.
close to the wound?
so... post op?
d). the attack was definitely planned in large part by the pretend victims of it, likely at the scene since they work and meet up there regularly, to defraud the public about them committing a coup...
- after just defrauding them about elections
- after just defrauding them about the word “peaceful”
- after just defrauding them about the word “idea”
- after just defrauding them about their police
- after just defrauding them over st. swallow-your-stash
- after just defrauding them about the no-smell flu
- after just defrauding them about st. just-jogging
- after just...
...wait what’s the character limit of a single post again?
those look like very sturdy allah hu-ak bars.
i trust an over-the-hill, gold-digging stripper/porn star, with a washed up career—desperate for one final paycheck in a profession not known for its wonderous retirement packages—to give an accurate accounting of the truth regarding her alleged sex life with the president, and putting honesty ahead of sensationalism/legacy/career... right about as much as i believe AOC's survivor stories.
trump likes long coats, and no one here would even know her name if not for her desperately jumping onto the tail of it like so many others. and what name do we know her by? her porn name. making it good for her profit margin should someone type it into google and see a bunch of ads, or cause her name's increased recognition to get book deals etc. she had every reason to lie and/or exaggerate to boost her celebrity; whether there's some truth to it, or none at all.
and i don't point that out to shame her, only to say her motives are more suspect than the story itself.
stormy sought easy attention and praise. tara reade for example risked attention for the hope of some measure of justice. not that i want to compare these two directly, but motive and personal cost can tell you a lot.
people know you're rewarded for saying bad things about republicans, true or not. they also know you're punished for telling the truth about democrats.
election fraud witnesses made clear that this was a well known fact to the general public; giving further credence to their claims because of the cost they suffered by coming forward.
and none of that matters too much in regards to your simple question, but no worries, i haven't forgotten it.
trump supporters often disagree with him, both during and before holding office. not every trump supporter is straight, or even values marriage. much of his support comes from people that would never call themselves conservative or christian. a few such disagreements even from the christian/conservative side include...
- listening to jared/ivanka
- wanting to ban/regulate vaporizers
- admonishing video games in relation to them causing crime
- some of his foreign military engagements
- not using the insurrection act
that's just the tip of the iceberg. trump has changed and grown, like all of us have, and in more than just the last 4 years.
some people worried that trump would turn the presidency into a joke. however, the office seemed instead to turn him into a better man.
regardless, he's our representative in politics, not in all walks of life. our support for him can be zealous, but most of it comes from having someone in office who actually fought for us, not from us seeing him as some perfect role model. he is quite flawed, but at the same time; we've never had someone so good.
a man who doesn't cheat on his wife might make a good husband, but we wanted a good president, so we were naturally more concerned with whether he'd fuck the country.
the bible is full of men that were far FAR FAR more flawed than trump. many of those men have chapters that bear their names, but the only man worshipped by christians is jesus.
you can't reconcile "your christianity" with worship of any other man or woman, no matter what their deeds are.
in the less literal sense of worship, which i'm sure you meant even though you're speaking about christians:
conservatives/christians do not believe that they are perfect, or that we can create the perfect world for ourselves, let alone every individual alive or yet to be born. everyone is different and flawed, and everything we do will be imperfect. we do not believe we can create utopia, but believe every effort to try doing so will be at least as disastrous as the last time.
however we do believe some things are better than others, and that nothing is beyond improvement. life for us is a view of compromise. we know we can't please everyone because people want different things. individual freedom allows every person to have the things they want out of their own life, as long as that thing isn't control over other's lives. it is the only logical compromise.
trump did a good job making sure everyone in america could enjoy those rights, and that all of us could prosper; not just the "elites". he also did a good job fighting against the ones that want to force "their way of life" on everyone.
that's why we love him.
we aren't half as concerned with what he does in his life, as we are about keeping other people out of our own lives.
christians in particular have nothing to reconcile with in terms of voting for a man that will ensure they retain the freedom of religion.
don’t give in to fear or let her do so either. pain is not uncommon or unexpected during a lung infection. monitor her oximeter; that will tell you how well her lungs are working instead of how they’re feeling.
going to go have another chat with the actual big guy. i’ll tell him you’re looking for him.
how many january 6th’s is it though?
please restore our voting, i want her elected please. pretty please?
it’s kind of twitter to make our dementia suffering president asterisk-the-first feel less stupid when he’s speaking to literally no one.
cheap land due to erosion.
i’d be super shocked and surprised if the government decided to finally solve the problems that citizens once had with that land, once it no longer belongs to citizens.
we need him.
they have a point, and they do lots of shit.
i'm afraid that point works against your interests, and the shit they do leads to things like joe biden being sworn in.
it's a source of power that doesn't need elections, they simply hire whatever garbage shares their beliefs. unaccountable corruption.
3...2...1...
and... an executive order declares all currency be made digital to stop hate speech.
some people are unreachable. some worry more about convincing you that they didn’t fuck up because they only care how they’re perceived; they live fake lives in many more ways than just that one. some are tim pools who are too afraid to say they voted for either candidate, as both answers might have a “cost” and say “didn’t vote this year”.
but in my experience, when someone comes to me and tells me they didn’t vote biden (or something similar), yet i’m as certain as is possible that they did, i take it as them being afraid to tell me the truth. yet if they care to talk to me, there is a reason for that.
if you pretend you believe them, and don’t chase them away by shouting or getting carried away with rhetoric, they’re likely to tell you the truth, later, when they trust you more.
if you have to go to them to have a talk, or it’s a forced discussion like a family dinner, it’s rarely good in outcome. if they sense you’re just trying to make them feel bad they’ll check out.
but be receptive to anyone who comes to you—rare though it may be at first—they probably respect you already if they approached, but are too afraid of feeling judged to be open.
places like twitter and stuff, i don’t know how to reach people like that.... not sure if it can be done. i talk one on one as much as possible.
go walk together, go out for beers, or private messages or something like that. talking in public like on twitter or at protests or even group convos... people put up defenses and pick sides based on who they fear is watching rather than actually talk.
i like to take people out of crowds to talk, and i don’t want them to feel it’s even a 2+ against 1 either.
one on one conversations drop people’s defenses. it’s not about winning or feeling judged, it’s about connecting. you can reach them, and they can reach you. social media has hurt us by making this so rare now.
still, we can do some good even without knowing who’s to blame. they know though. the “public memes” i think are really effective.
you can reason with the reasonable, but it’s never been quick to do so. if you’re going to be talking either way though, speak the truth.
the part that worries me isn’t in how many minds we can change or how fast. my worry is how many people who understand—and acknowledge the the truth of the fraud—are already are letting it go.
more of this absolutely everywhere please.
does he talk like this when he’s fucking his wife, or just when he’s fucking america?
i might celebrate tim’s achievement of such a milestone.
he’s like 2 IQ points above needing a chin strap to keep his beanie on.
elected?