"She's no Wallace." Sounds like a compliment to me. She wasn't going to make a fool of herself just to spite Trump. God help us when "just a regular amount of bias against Trump" is the COMPLIMENT.

Didnt governor Whitmer say the exact same thing during a press conference the other day? It was like "if you want to end the lockdown and get back to work, you need to vote Trump out of office. As long as he is there, the lockdowns will continue."

"If they kill me... and the loved ones I JUST said I would protect with my words."

I guess he had too many characters and his tweet was cut off before he could finish telling loved ones that his conscience is worth their lives. He couldn't possibly be so short sighted. If I didn't know any better, I'd say he didn't put an ounce of thought into his position.

He says he doesn't care about putting himself at risk. He says he accepts the personal consequences of his actions. He says he is comfortable with people near him being put in mortal danger. Does that sound familiar? It should, since it's the exact same reasons his ilk use to criticize people who aren't wearing masks.

Its fine when he puts himself and his family in grave danger, but you are forced to wear a mask because... you might put you and your family in grave danger. It doesn't matter if you accept the consequences or not.

I'm so sick of the constant hypocrisy.

Hah! This is hilarious! Well done!

As they say in the business, "Where's the lie?" LOL. Wish the world was full of both of you guys. It would be a much better place to live in.

Wow. The guy actually thought the "it might be illegal" was referring to pictures of houses, and not whether posting the pictures of specific houses online to dox or target someone is illegal. Good God they are dumb. His argument is that Google maps photos are legal, so his must be too. Just wow.

That's like claiming you can legally shut a neighbor's water off because the city does it, too. "Cant be illegal for me if it's legal for them to turn water off."

Pathetic.

Right. I could have said that better.

I was doing some Coronavirus research for a post here A FEW DAYS AGO (its relevant) and the "helpful questions" drop down said something like "is Covid dangerous for kids?"

The answer was, of course, "Yes, kids have been suddenly dying more than ever!" The article linked was from APRIL. Oddly, everything else had articles from October 10th and more recent. That tells me that the scary article must be wrong, or they would have used something more current.

Its funny that is what Martin Luther did. He was progressively reviving the pure, uncommercialized faith.
"By grace are you saved by faith, not of works, lest any man should boast." - huge Fuck You to selling redemption and a way for poor and crippled people to stay connected to the faith. Being good is good, but it isn't a competition and you cant get a 1.4 GPA in faith and buy your way into Heaven Law School.

I don't think they really saw what was happening with the full vision. Humans tend to default to assumed things in familiar situations. Thats why most wrecks happen near the home. They saw a politician call his little grandkid up and, like every other time but this one, it probably didn't really occur to them that it would be... this.

I'm willing to bet some of them cheered, then like a minute later were like... "Wait a second... no, that must have been a weird angle. I must be seeing things."

If you watch people get assassinated with blades (not like "if you are the type to" but like "if you ever see footage.") The crowd doesn't catch on at all until the gasps start. They expected a handshake or a fake gut punch,("hey slugger, ho!") so that's what they see. The difference is the blood and the dropping body afterwards that makes it impossible to not revisit.

That is exactly my point. Thank you.

The Pope has actively criticized America (the people AND the nation) Trump, and every single cause Republicans care about. Its a joke. A Conservative Martin Luther is due to make some changes to the structure.

If you could elaborate, maybe we can figure out what is wrong. Where is the lie, so to speak.

You disagree the Pope is bad and the archbishops and bishops of many major cities are Democrat hacks, and the one Christian denomination with a problem with pedophilia that is systemic? I mean, the upper clergy just moved pedophiles to other churches, rather than canning them. I would have a problem with that, if I were Catholic, and I wouldn't need to stop being Catholic.

You cant possibly disagree that Catholics are not responsible for the way the pope acts and causes he supports? There are no edits in my post. I didn't change anything. Catholics are not bad, but the upper levels of the clergy? Piss poor. You, if you are Catholic, deserve better.

I was kind of zeroing in on the pedophilia part, since its odd how the one he picked is the one with the bad rap for the exact thing... like,what are the odds?

I don't know. Can you read?

Good guess.

Dude... start sharing this as "Where is Jill while Biden smootches this young woman?"

Just wait until they try to debunk it.

Horizontal stripes make people look larger. Weird to stare at a kid's chest in something that makes them look just a tad more old... this picture was the first k saw and it still creeps me out. You bet your ass it creeps out the coworkers I've shown.

Simple: Ask them to read a cnn article about Biden and then say "Yeah, that is still fake news, so I'm not seeing the inconsistency. CNN just told you it was Russian lies, that's fake news. See, we want evidence and the laptop is evidence. The real question, is why hasn't ANY OTHER story that turned out to be fake news been completely censored like this story was?

Let's use an example. Bob Woodward was reporting on a story and interviewed Trump. A REPORTER was INTERVIEWING the PRESIDENT... and somehow the media reported Trump SECRETLY ADMITS HE DOWNPLAYED VIRUS TO AVOID CAUSING A PANIC. How in gods name is talking to a reporter on the record in an interview for a news outlet a secret? Because Woodward didn't use it in his original story? Maybe it was off the record, you might say. YOU YOURSELF SAID WE BELIEVE IT IS ALL FAKE NEWS, SO WHY WOULD TRUMP TRUST A JOURNALIST TO KEEP A SECRET?"

How would boycotting the debate help Trump? Rather, how could it be more effective than having the debates?

He needs the debates since it is the only time he will be able to confront Biden. Joe WANTS to hide. The only guaranteed place he will show up to is the debate. It is like a coyote hunting a prairie dog. The prairie dog will stay buried in its tunnel as long as the coyote is nearby, but every full moon, the prairie dog is compelled to hop out of the hole, shake its ass, then lay down outside its hole and sleep until morning.

A suggestion that the prarie dogs should not be eaten while above ground and defenseless would probably be dismissed and disagreed with.

. Tbe debates are free food for a wolf with brass balls.. You take whatever you can get. If the debate only nets Trump a single vote more than boycotting, it would be worth it.

This probably won't hey the recognition it deserves. I can tell you spent some time lining everything up to match with Leftist dogma and... debate(this isn't the right word, but it is the closest to a political conversation you can have with Hank supporters that isn't "screeching" or "assault") points.

God bless you for the effort. If no one else says it, you can trust me when I say its a great post.

Love the name, by the way. Glad you are here representing the generation that had to actually remember things.

Because she is as skinny as the mic stand, if that wasn't clear enough. She probably knows so many secrets because all she needs is a burka and people would just think she was a broken tripod.

Its not butter. Pelosi has tubs of ice cream that go bad.