I've been seeing this line a lot lately...

Imagine the Game of Thrones scene where Jon becomes the Watch Commander or whatever. Instead of shapes with holes in them for each candidate, 69% of the Night Watchmen have a Saltine cracker. Every time the blind guy grabs a cracker, he has to waste time trying it on each stick. If he can't determine who the vote is for, he hands it to his assistant, who pushed for Saltines to be used for voting. After handing it off, he grabs a new vote to tally. The assistant is supposed to show the cracker to two witnesses and announce who the vote was for. The tabulation process is taking way too long, so they stop checking if they fit on a stick. A ton of votes start going directly to the assistant. He can't possibly confirm that many votes with the witnesses, so he grabs a handful of crackers and declares they were all for his preferred candidate. Then he eats the crackers.

He deliberately bogged the system down with inefficiency to set up bulk judgements, which put him in a position to grant votes to his preferred candidate.

In the opening of the report, it details the voting machines running inefficiently on purpose. The reason that matters is in the same paragraph, but it must be invisible.
The 69% error rate is inefficient, because it causes the ballots to go to a manual adjudication. That 69% of manual ballot adjudication CAN BE DONE IN BULK WITH NO AUDIT TRAIL.

THAT is why inefficiency is fraud and not just a delay in ballot processing.

Everyone knew Democrats cheated in the places they control. It is NORMAL for city Democrats to cheat. We all just shook our head at their greed and power hungry brand of slime. Now look what we have.

They haven't changed a bit. Everyone saying the "Democrats left me, I didn't leave them!" had a long distance relationship in the first place. Democrats didn't change, they just don't need to hide anymore.

Everyone is so focused on these massive gambits, when enough double voters, dead voters, and illegal/inelligible votes exist to flip the election.

That requires no nefarious schemes, no grand steals, and no corruption. Just the ERRORS are enough. Art of the deal means we shoot for the stars, but simply removing dead voters, illegal voters, and such is enough on its own.

There is no way a normie will be alright with the bare minimum of inelligible votes, and there are hundreds of thousands of them. Can you imagine anyone outside of DC and the media that would say "votes from people who died a decade ago should be counted." No. That is the thread to pull. Maybe all the evidence of vote switching by machines and outright illegal actions can be ignored or suppressed, but no one in their right mind would tell you that their dead grandma's vote should count.

Can you imagine the shitstorm "we counted votes from dead people and illegal immigrants, and they can't be removed." Would cause?

The simple argument is all we NEED to win. The crony corruption bitchslapping is what we need to survive.

There are two main uses possible. First, as an attack. The media/dems could seriously damage anyone they dont like with just a few words changed, like turning "do" into "don't."

The second use is to protect their friends. The Biden campaign could have recorded him opening and closing his mouth without a single word spoken, then dubbed their footage. Biden could have recorded multiple silent versions ahead of time and then released them with a current message. Maybe a tragedy occurs and they dub a reference in, as if he was actually following the news about it.

Could we look back and definitively know what was said? What if the original footage is wiped and no other versions exist? Scrubbing history is a regular event for tech companies and the media, but this could get very 1984ish very quickly.

I'm pretty sure someone else brought something like this up a while back, but maybe I'm just misremembering.

Most metal President in History. The British were less of a problem than the media and the Left.

I imagine we have many people in, or near, these focus areas. We know what is happening where, but what can we actually do to help in these areas? Im talking physically, since anyone can make a phone call.

Where is our physical presence needed most? What support would be best? I don't care if it is bringing a 6 pack of diet coke, a flashlight, or orange slices.

Help us focus, please.

Cause and Effect. Risk and Reward. TLDR: FOX News is run by cowards who know that Trump won't go after them because he plays by the rules, but Biden and Harris will murder them in public while the rest of the MSM applauds their competitor as they are torn apart.

Whenever an action occurs, especially at the highest level of things, you can bet there is more than just sheer emotional or vindictive reasoning behind it.

Comey, Mueller, and the FBI didn't go after Flynn because they hated him or because they hated Trump. They went after him because he is a patriot that gives Trump the ability to stamp his decisions with an immensely respected military hero's support. We have a saying here that everyone probably knows (several, actually) about the reasons for Democrat and Leftist actions...

"You only get flak when over the target' and "If the media is smearing them, they must be doing something right."

FOX had a reason for turning on us, and it is incredibly simple. If Joe Biden wins, the media, academia, and big tech won't lift a finger to protect Fox News when Joe picks up where Obama left off. If Trump wins, the media, academia, and big tech will naturally protect Fox News when Trump picks up where he left off. During a Biden term, reporters that try to expose corruption will be locked out of events, frozen out of jobs, and even arrested. The whole "news reporters should all be speaking truth to power! We will hold the president accountable!" thing is a unique to Republican presidents. The difference between today and 2008, 2012, or even 1990, is that all local news has grown into the same beast as the networks.

It doesnt matter what Fox News does against Trump, since they know he won't arrest them, beat them, send fanatics to burn down their houses, or otherwise use government power against them. Biden and Kamala, though...

Fox is placing the safest, most cowardly bet they can. What they didn't count on, was the popularity of other outlets during the election cycle. OAN and others rose to the challenge of providing actual facts, rather than opinion and bogus propaganda.

Below is the analogy of their traitorous, spineless, gutless, nutless bullshit.

**Fox came to a fork in the road. The road split into two, and both passed directly through a blind intersection. The Left road crossed a high traffic bike path, while the Right crossed busy train tracks. They had to choose between hitting people on bikes or hitting a train. Bikes probably wouldn't do more than dent their car, even if they hit an entire family. The train would crush their car and kill them, even if it wasn't a head on collision. They chose their own safety.

They didn't count on people watching them hit the gas, slam their left blinker on, and turn their wipers to high before gunning it through the bike path. They didn't count on people noticing Fox was laughing and texting, rather than trying to minimize the chance of crushing a biker. They didn't expect to be caught choosing to risk others, rather than themselves. **

Fox News is basically the three Scottish lords that betrayed William Wallace in Braveheart. They got some titles and land for their treachery, but that wasn't why they "tucked tail and ran." It was because they didn't believe they could win. Rewards helped, but ultimately... it was pure cowardice. A complete lack of intestinal fortitude. Bitch made shit.

So now you know. It is easy to betray someone who has limits and follows the rules, especially when the other guy has no limits and won't care about rules. Rather than help us avoid the mad dictator that terrifies them, they chose to suck his dick. Stay classy, Fox.

There are many ways to prove voter fraud, and each new addition of votes should make you look at total turnout. Great they they are majority Trump votes, but that isn't all they are. They also make Democrat votes less likely to be real.

85% turnout is ridiculously high and questionable, so 87% is EVEN MORE questionable. Don't look at stats in a vacuum, basically.

[Edit: CHANCE of being cornered] One axiom of military action is that you want to avoid cornering the enemy. That may sound counterintuitive, but the principle is based on natural reactions to stress. "Fight or flight," basically.

A cornered animal will fight to the death. Very few will fight if running is an option, because most predators are actually cowards.

You can also see a glimpse of this in the form of plea deals. The big charge is made, but the defendant would fight it tooth and nail, so a little pathway is formed for them to scurry into and escape the greater threat. In military action, leaving a path for the enemy to escape is a way of breaking morale. Saruman's dumb ass pinned the people of Rohan in Helm's Deep, which is why Theodin and Aragorn rode out the way they did. Their back was literally to a wall, so they only had one option. (Technically there were caves, but no escape large enough to hold hundreds of people and their stuff.)

Dominion is that escape route for the fraudsters of the Left. It doesn't matter if Dominion systems changed a single vote, because it just became an easy fall guy for the people who did the fraud at the local level. "Oh, it must have been Dominion!" Is what they will say now, rather than "I'm going to fight to the death to stop any audits or recounts!"

The bigwigs will still fight the audits, but you should not underestimate the power of "We are going to do these audits whether you help or not. The only thing you need to figure out, is whether it was Dominion switching votes, you switching votes, or you AND Dominion switching votes. Who could blame you if this program was responsible for all the fraud, right?"

I don't know if this is happening, but I know blaming the rampant fraud on a system that the local Democrat poll workers unknowingly participated in, must be a mighty tempting way out of something so vile as election fraud. Even if it is only preparation for the inevitable accusation, "it wasn't me, it was the one armed machine!" will be on their minds. (But after the fraud is revealed... get ready for some "and ill whisper... NO." Action!)

Maybe it is best in an example:

The Left accuses Trump supporters of intentionally plowing vehicles into their "peaceful" protests. As in, we get in our car, turn the key and think "I can't wait to squish those Lefty protestors beneath my tires," while the engine roars to life.

We deny their accusations. There isn't a single video of Left wing mobs being crushed by a vehicle at full speed, let alone accelerating and swerving into them. There is tons of footage showing stopped or extremely slow vehicles accelerating after being surrounded and attacked by a mob of violent monsters, but that is not what the Left is accusing.

Then a deranged Leftist gets filmed driving a vehicle as they accelerate, swerve, and collide with some Trump supporters. When we use the footage as one of the thousands of examples of Left wing violence against actually peaceful protestors, they defend their psycho by calling US hypocrites. They say "both sides" and call our justified outrage whataboutism. Essentially, it's "You guys didn't have a problem with dozens of right wing vehicle attacks on protestors! I don't see a single post or comment that condemns intentionally running protestors over!"

The entire time, we've said it never happened, but they frame it as if we are actually saying it is acceptable to run people over and we just don't care because a Trump supporter hit a Lefty. We say the Brianna Taylor incident was a bad situation, but the cops didn't do anything wrong(except the one blind firing into the window), and they hear "Cops are allowed to kill black women according to Republicans and Trump supporters."

We are denying their accusations altogether, but they hear it as a defense of their claims of injustice. Kyle Rittenhouse was clearly defending himself, so we want him released from jail and his charges dismissed. The Left ignores the self defense part and says we want him released, even though he shot three Leftist scumbags. When their guy in Portland stalked, ambushed, and murdered a Trump supporter in cold blood, they acted like we were OK with murder.

There needs to be a word or phrase that describes this particular tactic. Additionally, we need a way to avoid or limit this deliberate game they play to muddy the waters. I don't have a single clue what to call it, but we can stop their misleading framing by condemning the action they are accusing us of, then giving our reason why it doesn't apply.

"Shooting protestors in cold blood is murder, but Kyle was clearly defending himself in the videos I saw. Self Defense against people attacking you isn't murder."

"Running peaceful protestors over intentionally is sick and evil, but there aren't any videos of a Trump supporter deliberately ramming a crowd of protestors. In every one, the driver is trying to escape and their path is blocked."

"Police shouldn't be killing people for no reason, but they had plenty of reason in the Breanna Taylor case, since they were fired on first. "

That extra line of condemnation for what they are alleging goes first, then the explanation of how their claim doesn't apply. Its a small change that will make the media even less credible to normies when they try to sell the Right as a bunch of hypocrites, especially when they need to defend their own people who are actually causing the problems.

Predictable Left. Stalinists gonna Stalin.

Ask Democrats, friends, coworkers, or otherwise what they have against a recount to prove Trump lost. Call your democrat congressional reps, federal, state and local and ask why they haven't supported recounts in the public forum.

I'll probably repost this bit as the title to a different post, but here is your question...

"If you really want unity, will you support the recounts that would prove Joe Biden won fairly beyond a shadow of a doubt?"

Thats it. Short and sweet. Let THEM deny or make excuses.

IT ISNT "COMING TOGETHER" TO DENY A REQUEST THEY SHOULDNT BE AFRAID OF... IF THEY BELIEVE THEY WON AND WON FAIRLY.

"It is safe for fraud to occur, it is normal!"

"Illegal ballots aren't fraud! Its legal!"

"Its so rare! Why are we even talking about it!"

Most consistently evil party in America by far.

Preface: This isn't about winning arguments, it is about making people accept facts or admit they dont give a shit about facts.

Frame The Debate(fix the goalposts to one spot): Don't waste time debating any vote fraud deniers(the "lol, no evidence of that!" People) until you've asked them a simple question. "WILL EVIDENCE OF WHAT I JUST CLAIMED CHANGE YOUR MIND?" You can throw evidence at people all day, but they need to commit if they want to be taken seriously. 7/10 times, asking if they will accept evidence of my claims results in a complete ghosting. They can't do it, and it looks bad for them. In the other 3/10, they might say yes, but they NEVER say no. (For clarity: I'm talking about the "oh yeah, show me evidence" people who don't actually want evidence. They just want to tie you up debating nothing. If they don't commit to accepting the evidence, they dont get to ride the debate train. Put THEM on the spot instead of listing all the fraud they will just say you still didn't show proof for.)

Start Small With Assumptions(assume they are just misinformed): Most people who say there is no evidence BELIEVE there isn't any. That isn't the same as those who know there is but don't care.
Assumption: "Lets assume poll watchers were kicked out of polling places. Would that be fraud or can you explain that some other way?""

Assumption: "Lets assume the vote totals changed up for one candidate and down for the other by the exact same number. Would that be fraud, or can you explain that some other way?" If they don't say that is fraud, the next line is "ok. It could happen, but how many times in a single state would look like fraud to you?"

Assumption: "Lets assume 400k people voted for Biden and only Biden. Trump had a 96% approval rate in the Republican party. How many Trump, and only Trump, votes do you think we should have seen? What was Biden's party approval?"

Assumption: "Lets assume poll training discussed ways to keep poll watchers from watching using coronavirus 6ft rules and their backs to a wall. Would that be suspect?"

The goal here isn't to change their mind from NO FRAUD to YES FRAUD. It is to change their mind from NO FRAUD to RECOUNT IS REASONABLE. Here is why...

Democrats HATE questions. When we raise questions in the reasonable ones, they ask the ones that want to win at all cost, at which point the reasonable person gets blasted and called a liar, fraud, Trumpster, the whole bit.

Poof. You've just created another Trump supporter. The Left is SO TOXIC that even QUESTIONING their reality is grounds for an all out assault. Our job is to create those questions, not to wow them with 87 links and 55 data analysts and all the Benford's law stuff. That is great data, but you have to get a horse to take a sip from the water before dunking its head in.

Start small and neutral and raise the questions. Use the things we have specific, verifiable, completely undisputable truth on.

1. poll watchers kicked out.

2. vote switching

3)Biden Solo votes in the millions vs Trump in the 1000s.

4. That poll recording from Detroit (the one with "mr. Stark examples)

We don't need to sell dead voters, because the sources aren't credible(to democrats, and yes it is dumb, but thats how they are.) We just need to make them see a recount makes sense. Everything flows from there. It just takes a single "yeah, that is kind of shady" and their Dem buddies will eat them alive, letting them see who actually cares about free and fair elections.

Hope this helps in your battles online. Find the reasonable person and chip away at the Democrats' truth blindfolds.

"Her turn" is how you describe ALLOWING kids to ride a pony, not Presidential elections.

Make sure everyone knows how unpopular Obama and Hillary must have been if they believe the Biden vote count.

Put their egos to the test.

By doing it AFTER THEY THINK THEY WON.

The ONLY way to get more salt is to make them more sure. They aren't just wondering if they will win now, they actually think they DID WIN.

I'm sort of joking, but I'm serious about one aspect of this, which is the destruction of media credibility on the Left. In 2016, The media lied to them constantly, which made them confident in their victory. When that turned into a loss, cable news took a gigantic hit to viewers and credibility.

The media, after moving mountains to stop Trump, will have to eat their words in a way we've never seen before. The radical Left will blame them and it won't be pretty. They failed, and the Left only cares about winning. Countless heroes of the Left have been pumped up, given the shot, missed, and then destroyed or dropped.

Its coming, and it will be a hell of a ride.

We have a GOLDEN opportunity here. Chat with people in the area. Hear their stories of the fraud they think they just got away with.

The first black president had to ride an old, senile, white, rich guy's coattails into the Whitehouse! Obama would have lost in a 50 state landslide without the seemingly infinite number of Biden supporters that voted Democrat.

It was always Biden, and Obama contributed nothing at all to the campaign. Really, if you think about it, Biden let the little guy pretend to be the president for 8 years. Biden must have felt sorry for such an unpopular guy like Obama is.

Glad we cleared this up.

Hell, check the Democrat primary totals for all candidates vs Biden votes, too.

Thats it. Watch as Biden's people and the media explain why a recount isn't needed, despite the massive fraud allegations. There is no reason why they wouldn't agree, especially if Trump says he will abide by the recount results, assuming all laws are followed without complaint.

Biden cant afford a recount and we all know it. Let Biden show how much of a "uniter" he is.

I'm sure most have seen it, but I'll describe it better. In the video, a black guy is sitting at a desk covered with boxes and papers. He opens a ballot, screams at it, shakes his fist at it and appears to give it the middle finger, then balls it up. He grabs a few more ballots and slaps them onto a stack in front of him. Finally, he grabs a ballot, reads it and crumples it up, too.

Imagine you have been told you need to make Biden win. If you do, you will get a bonus or some sort of prize. You have been told it will be an easy gig. At some point, Sally will tell you how many ballots you need to find for Biden. Sally walks up, sets a ballot box beside you and whispers "start finding Biden votes. I'll update you on the number needed as we find out what the results are at other places."

You get to work. Check the ballot. Stack the Biden ones. Trash the Trump ones. Sally brings up another box and sets it down without saying a word. This goes on for hours. Sally hasn't said anything else, except when you asked how much longer, to which she replied "If Biden loses, you don't get anything. Keep going. I'll tell you when I know."

You check the ballot. Stack the Biden ones. Trash the Trump ones. Your hands are starting to hurt, and you want to quit, but leaving means you get nothing. Another hour and a refrigerator on wheels rolls up to you. You rub your tired, voter fraud stained hands on your tired, voter fraud strained eyes. It isn't a fridge on wheels. Its a dolly stacked 6 feet high with white boxes... boxes of ballots... Sally doesn't say shit. She dumps them and hustles off, screened by a wall of paper. Behind you, someone says "120K! That's impossible!" In a high pitched whisper shout.

You look at the stacks and stacks and REAMS of votes it will take to get your little bonus.

You check the ballot and think... Stack the Biden ones(120k?). Trash the Trump ones(120k?!). You open the ballot... Trump(120 MOTHERFUCKING THOUSAND?!). Trash. Open the ballot. Trump.(OH MY GOD.) Open the ballot. TRUMP.(MOTHERFUCKER) Open the ballot. TRUMP!!!!! Open the ballot. SLAM IT FOR BIDEN(119,999 LEFT!) Open the ballot. TRUMP (RAGSGEGEUEKRNNHARRJAYYYUUNBBBNKKLK!!!!)

It is here that the video ends.

Watch it again, and know that this isn't just a joke. That guy is beyond rage at a ballot. It had to happen somehow, and my theory is as good as any other.

I said "There is no way Trump got less votes than Biden. In the last few elections, common wisdom was that a Republican who could swing 5 or 6% more of the total black vote than the usual 7 or 9% would be a game ender. Trump went well beyond an extra 5 or 6%."

They responded "Turnout was higher for black voters this time, so it didnt matter if he got more. He got more black votes, but so did Biden."

I said "The total vote share isn't based on turnout, so that doesn't really matter. Its the percentage of all black votes, whether there is 10 or 5 million. Each one Trump gets over the average previous amount is a positive for Trump and a negative for Biden, which doubles the impact."

They responded "but it cost Trump OLDER WHITE MALE VOTERS(emphasis added) so it didn't help him."

I said "Convincing black voters to vote for someone that sees them as equals in prosperity, rather than just a vote every 4 years, made old white men support the Democrats? How does that make sense? I guess you think Trump's incredible performance with Latinos also pushed out older white men?"

They responded "Yes! They were sick of Trump trying to win Black and Latino voters, so they voted for Biden."

I said "It sounds like you just admitted racist old white men flocked to Biden and the Democrats... because they wanted a more racist candidate and party... and that is your explanation for the vote totals being accurate? The "Trump Isnt Racist Like The Democrats" vote? Do you want to rethink your theory?

So far no response...

Yes, they are this stupid.

If it is between Obama's legacy and Biden support, I wonder who they will side with? Democrats are petty and evil enough to turn on Biden to protect Obama without a second thought. Let them do the work invalidating Biden votes, too.

Positivity starts with a declaration.

If you are capable of doing something, do it. Here are some things to do...

Camp the polls where the problems are. Record everything. Get video proof anywhere you can. Don't settle for someone telling you something when you can go record the actual thing. - press the red button and put your phone in your breast pocket facing out with the flash off. Start recording in your car or down the road so you don't appear to be recording. -

Check the post history of any naysayers and deport. Look for 1 or 2 posts a month for the last few months, then 10 over the last 2 hours.

Monitor election sites for updates. Report anything fishy that ISNT ALREADY IN THE TOP 50. This is not a time to farm likes and upvotes.

Call your congressional representatives and ask them what they are doing/planning about voter fraud. Be nice. The worst feeling in the world is someone wearing Trump gear acting the fool. Respectfully disagree when you get static. It isn't winning to tell your Republican representatives that they are witless, spineless cucks, and they should fuck off and die. It just makes the ones who should be on our side into enemies.

I want to be perfectly clear here. Public perception matters when the trial is influenced by public opinion. Democrats have mastered the art of the victim, so we need to master the art of the defender. Defenders cant victimize people, so it takes their power away. Please don't give me the "so you're saying we can't speak our mind? 1st amendment bro!" crap. Say whatever you want, just try to avoid pointlessly turning people away from Trump.

Watch election coverage for meme worthy moments and blatant lies. Find lies and fake fact checks to tear apart. We have to keep hammering at fake news and partisan hacks. That is a service that will always be needed.

We gotta stay positive and help where we can. You are all legends.