6
MagaDoc123 6 points ago +6 / -0

Seen lots of reports of deaths following the vaccination, and one source I saw said 20% were from cardiac arrest. So far know 2 people in the real world who did. I believe both were from the pfizer one which basically was not tested on the elderly (if you read the study, they just made the cut off for patients above and below 55 in the reporting, which is one way drug companies hide never testing on vulnerable elderly).

One (elderly) was the close friend of a patient. They had a bad reaction to the first vaccine and had to delay the second one while the issues were being resolved. After the second dose, patient died of cardiac arrest within 48 hours.

Second (also elderly) was a family friend of a close friend. He had a bad reaction to the first vaccine, and then suffered heart failure and cardiac arrest shortly after the second vaccine.

In the case of the first one, a doctor was willing to say it was probably due to the vaccine. In the case of the second family is still in denial that it could have been the vaccine. Neither of these cases was reported to VAERS; the vaccine monitoring system that seems to capture between 1-10% of vaccine reactions depending on who you ask. I haven't really gone out of my way to ask everyone if they know anyone whos died, these were just two stories that were volunteered to me and I suspect patient's typically would not share them. So I think this is probably happening but I have no way to know how common it is. I've also been told by friends in Israel there are a lot of reports of deaths occuring there in normal age people (where everyone is being forced to get the vaccine and terrified of it), including in personal friends but most of the reporting on instagram is in hebrew so I can't really translate/evaluate it.

2
MagaDoc123 2 points ago +2 / -0

Interesting double standard:

You can make news stories up, and cite unconfirmed anonymous sources if it incriminates Trump

but if it makes Trump look good, you can falsify and doctor evidence or documents.

I've lost count of how many times this has happened.

1
MagaDoc123 1 point ago +1 / -0

Technically it should not be possible to require anything that isn't FDA approved (they only have an EUA) but stuff like that is done to the Military all the time with other experimental treatments.

6
MagaDoc123 6 points ago +6 / -0

Everyone I know so far (relatives of patients or friends) who has died from the COVID vaccine has not been reported as a COVID Vaccine death. In Isreal they have a lot of reports of this occuring to healthy young people, and my friend there has had people he know die from the COVID vaccine, but it's difficult to tell most of this because while websites have collected the information, it's all in hebrew and hence not easy to translate. A previous head of the FDA reported that at best 10% of adverse reactions to vaccines and drugs are reported. I feel with the COVID vaccine its less than that and there are probably 20-50x the number of deaths found in official figures.

5
MagaDoc123 5 points ago +5 / -0

The fascinating thing about this was that COVID was concluded to have started circulating in China in late November 2019, which strongly suggests they leaked it deliberately to make a profit/market, as the timing is literally right before the deal was signed :0

5
MagaDoc123 5 points ago +5 / -0

I have to note in fairness here, when Trump did the strikes immediately following the fake chemical attack, give or take everyone was demanding for the US to invade Syria, and I am relatively sure anyone besides Trump would have. Trump instead did a very surgical strike on the base, and specifically warned both the Syrians and the Russians to evacuate it beforehand so it would not turn into a war. This was initially not known and the media paraded Trump around like a hero/said this might be his first presidential moment (I remember that word for word on CNN). Then once it was known people switched to talking shit about it. Watching how Trump handled that (finding a way to prevent the situation from turning into the war with a very targeted persuasive/symbolic act rather than say an act of war) was the thing that made me conclude he was 100% committed to actually being an anti-war president.

Biden's strike was different. It was just done immediately without warning and killed people. The only thing I can sort of give in Biden's defense was that the intended target was on Iranian units in Syria rather than on the Syrian government, but it was still a complete violation of international law.

2
MagaDoc123 2 points ago +2 / -0

I just want to note that they specifically said it was white supremacy to try and stop the protests over and over whenever we tried to save the communities from being burned down...