The more it goes on and the more the media hypes up the risk and especially the concern that the national guard might flip, the more I worry they're laying the groundwork for a big false flag.

Yeah so whatever happened to Twitter CEO saying under oath that they didn't have a bunch of topic suppressing tools that they did turn out to have after all when they got hacked? It's technically arguable that they were only trying to stop the incitement of violence when they purged 70k people. It's objectively provable that they lied about site tools they were using to manipulate discussion.

There are still local ballot issues,

Apparently they're convinced Trump was holding them back from reaching wider support..

Washington reps live in a 100% mail vote state. Anyone trust mail votes after this year?

I mean, that people would flood to sites like theirs when the twitter ban happened was foreseeable. I just don't think anyone foresaw twitter purging that many people at once.

They shut down attempt for Gab was years ago. They already rebuilt with their own infrastructure.

I mean, there's a reason I never used the facebook, twitter, or parler apps.

If I remember, some political hopeful running for British office got banned off twitter and announced she would be on Parler, and a bunch of people followed her there.

Let's be fair here: we know one was shot and one had a history of heart issues and died of a heart attack. The other two's causes of death, at least as far as I've seen, haven't been reported on.

We know they shot one, and that's already one too many. We don't need to politicize the other three before the facts are out.

Or it was something they've wanted to do for a while, and Trump being near the end of his term and thus less likely to drive news-related traffic removed any reservations while the capitol occupation gave them the excuse.

Gonna take this chance to pitch Minds as well. Doesn't require as much personal info to set up an account as parler did and the site owner's personal page is basically nothing but bashing other sites for not being free-speech.

Continued resistance. Shutting down venues for communication impedes organizing.

I feel like this happens every election? Or am I just thinking about online petitions?

Exclusion of illegals stands. As in, the decision to forbid illegals from being used to gain seats won't be overturned.

Well, whatever else happens, at least California won't falsely inflate their house/electoral college numbers. Makes for more states that the dems will have to rig in future elections.

Yyyyyeah good luck getting a court to uphold that.

Facebook went down? I was gonna write this off as a glitch until more info came out, but multiple major companies crashing on short succession is weird.

Meanwhile all the articles on the Olympia fight make sure to highlight it was a Trump supporter that pulled the trigger on a "person" while downplaying that the counter-protestors crashed the event and attacked the people protesting Inslee.

Critical as of the most recent story I could find.

I live in blue territory and voted Trump purely to add to his nationwide popular vote count. But also yeah the cheating in places that can actually swing is disgusting and does make on question what the point of voting is if there's no recompense for blatant election theft.

Main problem is most of his videos are 3x longer than the amount of content justifies. All issues with content itself are secondary.

If they don't do their job and contest all this fraud, Trump needs to either take over the RNC or start a new party and take all the GOP's former voters with him.

230 protects minds, gab, parler, bitchute, and all the other alt tech sites. The problem isn't 230. The problem is a too loose idea of what 230 protects and no enforcement when social media act like publishers.

Nope. If the government were functional, we'd have had this information released sooner.