1
Marble68 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 2A is seriously in deep shit. SCOTUS is likely going to fuck us

2
Marble68 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trying to do what?

1
Marble68 1 point ago +1 / -0

See I’m with you on that - but I think what we are seeing is pretty simple.

What we are seeing is communists reaping what they’ve sewn in education.

They created a leftist tinderbox and COVID was the accelerant.

Critical race theory - all this bulls hit - the reactions are predictable and chaotic.

Mixing socialist ideology with a dose of “independence kills grandma” for decades, throw a crisis in the mix and watch it burn.

Progressives are amoral, BAMN assholes that’ll capitalize on anything to crush independence and undermine a country based on it.

This is just, IMHO, a result of a disconnected hive mind mentality that conglomerates to ideas that are perceived as effective towards those two goals.

2
Marble68 2 points ago +2 / -0

He hasn’t because it’s just BS and if he weighs in he gets tied to it.

It’s like fixing a neighbor’s friend’s PC. You touch it, you own it.

It has nothing to do with him, or he it, and pointing to a lack of statement by Trump is the same logic of me asking you why you haven’t stopped molesting children or beating your wife.

Exactly the same kind of question.

Its an illogical leap to establish credibility with a self fulfilling, prophetic premise IMHO.

Claiming him not attacking it is proof it’s legitimate doesn’t pass any sort of confirmation bias critical thought, for me.

It’s an unverified, unprovable presumption.

You say it’s a dodge, I say ask a reasonable question or make a reasonable, verifiable point.

9
Marble68 9 points ago +12 / -3

Exactly.

And we’re not focused on it at all.

4
Marble68 4 points ago +4 / -0

She’s “scared” because she’s an insane leftists of the vein like Jack at Twitter who says Trump announcing he’s not going to the inauguration is him signaling it’s a soft target.

They’re fucking crazy.

-3
deleted -3 points ago +1 / -4
2
Marble68 2 points ago +3 / -1

Is believing all this crazy bullshit a requirement for believing in Trump? For being MAGA?

If you think it does, then you’re 100% working against Trump and MAGA IMHO.

1
Marble68 1 point ago +1 / -0

Same actor, different script is what I’m starting to believe.

3
Marble68 3 points ago +3 / -0

No - it’s a coordinated attack on we the people; divides the people from having a real conversation about how we’re all getting screwed by corrupt, power hungry elites

3
Marble68 3 points ago +3 / -0

Lol exactly- everything is insane - and that’s the issue

1
Marble68 1 point ago +3 / -2

No.

Tell me, why should he even address it or be required to?

2
Marble68 2 points ago +2 / -0

They’re going to do it so Trump can’t run again in 2024.

Watch - they’ll come out and say that’s why - to “protect America.”

4
Marble68 4 points ago +4 / -0

Seems people have taken the get in their face speech by Maxine Wayers to heart.

1
Marble68 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly.

He’s something for your confirmation bias that you should share, and apply zero critical thought to.

....

Hey, look at the stupid shit they’re spreading, everything they share is like this and it causes violence, they should be shut down.

Think, people, put your information warfare mind in gear.

3
Marble68 3 points ago +3 / -0

Holy F.

Conspiracy theories, wildly hyperbolic interpretations, and random posts on the Internet.

These people are insane

3
Marble68 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yup, figured.

One alternative is to add the IP with thedonald.win to your host file or local DNS - that way the browser will resolve it and inject the header.

That may work.

8
Marble68 8 points ago +8 / -0

The government is now whatever Democrats and their allies say it is, now.

Parler is a threat to twitter.

We already know big tech colludes to ban conservatives, good and bad - so they started getting federal scrutiny. Their solution was, "Hey apple, this is twitter, Parler is surging"

Why act in anti-competative ways that would get you in trouble when you can get your non-competitor cohort to do it for you?

"See Senator? We didn't stifle creative destruction."

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›