Or the people bussed in and paid per diem were those who "rushed the Capitol,"
That's probably what has them so scared. Hundreds of thousands of patriots showing up on their own time, their own dime to make their voices heard. Everything else was just controlled opposition.
Yup. There is a difference between someone posting on patriots.win and another communities.win site. I'm 100% behind giving them a place where they can talk without big tech censorship.
Let them have a place where they can talk without having spez and the rest of the high tech NKVD force them into bowing to the establishment.
Of course, if they come over here, that's what the deport button is for.
Drop them off in DC.
Naa. Just don't show up for work most days. Clocks and schedules are white supremacy. Come in at 1PM and tell your boss "Hey, give me more money Cracker."
He knows there are words on the teleprompter. Occasionally afterwards he says "What the fuck was that bullshit?"
Then his handler says "Look man, your Son fucks kids. You want him to go to jail for the rest of his life? You are President, now shut up and do what you are told."
I'll be honest, if I were Trump right now, I'd be going to bed with a big ol' smile and a chuckle, knowing how Mitch and company treated me back in 2000.
I think most of us knew that it would turn out one of two ways. Either they turn back and try to undo their disasteriffic policies. Or they would end up like Detroit.
I'm still waiting to see what's going to happen in Oakland, Portland, and Seattle.
Hmm, best we can do is a primary challenge.... Oh, right, Ex-Senator. Nevermind. We just can't do business. But, since Flake seems to be the kind of guy who would fuck a guy in the ass an not even have the goddamn common curtesy to give him a reach around, maybe the Democrats are the better party for him?
The electrical energy generation mix in California uses about 47% Natural Gas. So, it's ironic that they are banning use for thermal purposes (which it is about 100% efficient for this job). Instead relying on electrical heating. Of course, this method isn't as efficient. Although Combined Cycle Gas Turbines are among the most efficient power generators, at about 60% thermal efficiency, it's still not 100%. Peaker plants using Natural Gas are far less efficient.
So, the behavior of these policies are that they burn gas in an electrical generator, lose >40% of the energy (and release CO2 into the atmosphere), then transmit that power to electrical appliances.... rather than just burn the gas for thermal purposes at 100% efficiency.1
Apparently 47% natural gas. I guess the SJWs don't believe in science after all.
At first I was thinking that you were shitposting... But, I guess you are right.
At least the ban seems to be only San Francisco, not the entire state, but activists are working on it.
The 100% smooth brained play of this is that 47% of California's electrical generation is from Natural Gas. Even with Combined Cycle, you only get a 60% efficiency with natural gas... along with transmission losses, you'll end up with only ~50% of the energy actually available for thermal purposes at the residence, compared with 100% efficiency, when natural gas is used for thermal purposes.
Now, I'm actually a big fan of electric stoves, microwaves, tankless electrical heaters, etc... But, it's only when it's paired with something like nuclear, hydro, or a renewable behind it. But, banning natural gas for thermal purposes is... just super dumb.
Now do Portland? Or are Guardsmen only to protect the politically powerful, and people just wanting some coffee without getting attacked by rioters not important enough?
There is part of me that really feels bad for many fine talented female athletes who are otherwise locked out of competition, since they now have to compete against people who are essentially taking steroids.
There is another part of me that observes that the ones pushing for this are overwhelmingly women, and they need an object lesson on why this is a bad idea. Hopefully things are returned to normal when "women's sports" are dominated by trans-athletes.
Hopefully we will enter into a glorious age of an "Anything goes" league. Amputate your legs so you can replace them with superior prosthetics? Sure. Bull steroids? Not a problem. Blood replaced with perfluorocarbons? Let's see how far we can push this bad boy.
I'd be happy if the Vulture Capitalists get all banished to the Democratic party.
I'd be over the moon if Antifa gets thrown in, and we can close the doors. No matter who loses, we win.
Yup. It's better to do nothing, than "we have to do something, even if it fucks things up even more then it already is."
It's why we have a federal system. If the Federal government doesn't do it, it goes to the states, counties, cities, and finally to the individual.
China bucks to lobbyists and PR firms to convince everyone who says "Wuhan Virus" branded as a racist?
And the press likes nothing more to dress up in a airtight suit to sniff their own farts while calling people racists.
I think this is probably right. And I suspect that there will be quite a bit of support for more conservative candidates when people see the mass of unemployment and homeless that only seems to be prevalent in progressive cities.
Because he and his fellow travelers are planning on doing something where they need razor wire and thousands of solders to protect them from pissed off citizens?
I'm sure they can do Lincoln Project 2: More child grooming boogaloo.
We'll need to be reminded over the next 1, 3, and 5 years that we need to support their primary challengers.
And which Republicans signed up for primary challenges?
Because the government establishment is in it to enrich themselves and their friends. The only reason the GOPe and DNCe would fight is because they want a bigger piece of the taxpayer pie.
But if someone gets into office, they both try to minimize the elected officials impact until they are firmly nose deep in the tough.
They hated Regan for the same reason they hate Trump. They both had money, and weren't in it to enrich themselves.
Honestly, I kind of suspect that they will do something like forcing blue checkmarks to pay a fee each month, along with a process of getting that checkmark if you are willing to shell out the bucks. And in return their posts go to the top of the list for feeds.
I suspect they are hoping to get newspapers/companies/etc to shell out the subscription fee as a business expense for marketing.
It's because tweets aren't communication between people. It's advertising.
Ads in front of peoples eyes are the product, and they want to monetize this product.
Do it. Come on Jack, do it. Twitter is worth so much, people will line up around the block to pay $20 bucks a month to post. Those Trust and Safety employees won't work for free.
See, Rmoney is playing the long game.