The entire reason people hire lawyers and such is the specialty of the job, and access to unique resources
It appears his speculation was just based off of blog posts online, which was (improperly) boosted thanks to his lawyer credentials, while trusting people assumed he knew something we didn't have access to
It's not really based at all, it's just angry complaining
It's not even productive complaining (talking about making the best of things, directing people to legal efforts on election reform, etc), it's whining about the result
Biden's people do not give a shit if we see him as legitimate, they saw Trump as "cheating" for made up fake Russian bullshit
By calling him a cheater (without even adding useful evidence in context) you're just giving the appearance of a bad sport
Excuses are excuses
He was able to oppose Mitch on $2000 checks, he could have opposed him on Assange
The gop establishment already hates him, and he's considering his own party
Is there a reason he couldn't just accept the impeachment, then become the right wing "soros" equivalent (political ngos) and push Don Jr as president, then pardon Assange ET all?
I'm skeptical if he has any unique (non public) evidence
I heard a reasonably convincing argument scalia could have been killed by a prostitute or something, but the problem is that they weren't even able to replace him due to cocaine Mitch (who is corrupt af, and hypothetically should have been recruited to help)
The entire purpose of killing Scalia should have been to replace him, right?
Furthermore, IF he was assassinated successfully, it would be important for people (even Clinton) to NOT know as much as possible to prevent leaks
Sometimes people to just die out of the blue
Ruth Ginsberg SEEMED healthy out of recovery in August 2020, and dropped dead within a month. She was so close to the finish line, and the timing was incredible
She was way older than scalia, but seemed to have had better health
Folks, Trumps core has been getting harassed and deplatformed and doxxed since 2015, but ramped up post 2016
Trump has done a lot of good stuff, changed the gop quite a bit (the gop senate was ready to give dems a massive immigration win in 2014), but he let himself be surrounded be incompetents (like the Syria withdrawal guy), and took too long to act on issues like section 230
Him rejoining the private sector as a political activist could be extremely useful for everyone, he could be the "George soros" (using ngos, designing policy, etc) of the Maga world
Him rewinning the presidency in 2020 would have been ideal, and again this issue comes down to incompetent legal advisors fucking up election fraud prevention (Feds should have been in poll stations under cover)
Let's make the best of things from here on out
This is an area where I disagree with Trump
The Uyghur issue is something that dates back to the soviet days, when the USSR used propaganda to incite Uyghur revolts against Chinese KMT nationalists
The term "uyghur" didn't even exist until it was created in a Soviet council, it was the Soviets equivalent of our Mujadeen in Afghanistan
They Uyghur revolts only stopped once Mao took power, as per Stalin's order, but started back up again during the Sino-Soviet split
Literally every time it comes up it's a group of CIA fronts inciting Uyghurs to kill random Chinese people, the CCP police then end up being overly harsh on Han-Chinese (because Uyghurs are a minority and perceived as more vulnerable), then the Chinese anger at being suppressed by police is used to promote a Chinese revolt against the state (and CCP by extension)
The single biggest problem with China towards Xinjiang is the migration of millions of Han into that region, yet this issue is also a bit different since Han are still a minority there, and Uyghurs/minorities get preferential access to child support programs, so they aren't going to become a minority
The Uyghur thing is a fake issue
One of the more recent riots had a net total of 2 Uyghurs killed, and a few hundred Chinese killed
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_2009_%C3%9Cr%C3%BCmqi_riots
I realize there are serious problems with the Chinese government, but killing random Chinese people is NOT acceptable, no more than killing random Uyghurs
But the MSM reframes killing random Chinese as "peaceful protests", old Wikipedia article before they removed this quote in 2018:
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Terrorism_in_China&oldid=859758526
The occurrence of violence as a form of political resistance in China has been attributed to government policies restricting the practice of religion and political expression, particularly in the Xinjiang region. Because expression of grievances against government policies are not permitted, "acts of violence have replaced peaceful demonstrations as the expression of the Uyghur malaise," according to Rémi Castets.
During the past decade with various other terror attacks, a few thousand Chinese civilians got bombed to death
There are definitely PROBLEMS with the CCP and Chinese government as a whole, as well as ethnic relations, but the numbers don't add up for a "genocidal regime"
China makes people who demonstrated intent to potentially bomb/kill civilians take anti-terror classes, while still giving them some preferential treatment in other areas
Western countries like Britain make people who have potential to be upset about government inaction at terror take "anti-radicalization" classes, while giving leniency for actual terrorists (mass murderers)
https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/01/london-bridge-hero-deradicalization/
If anything, we should be leaving China alone on this issue, they are the ones actually trying to tone-down violent unrest for all sides
The thing he became infamous for was jacking up the cost on a niche drug to unaffordable levels, a stunt for stock prices or something, that's apparently common
He also had a record of being intentionally offensive on social media
What the MSM didn't tell you was he made sure everyone who needed the drug was able to get it subsidized and/or free, so his primary crime the media crucified him on was a lie
Are we sure it was a homeless fire and not a pipe break?
Martin Shkreli too! Don't forget he releases wutang tracks to celebrate 2016
What about the "republicans for Biden" we heard about? It was clearly a huge thing, so there's no problem
Q is operation "Trust" 2.0
Soviets used that to get Intel on all possible rebels by convincing them to wait for a force to save the day
Hence msm refers to (non violent) Q followers as "terrorists", the same way soviets and other regimes called dissidents terrorists
A second term for Trump is not coming in 2021, it will have to wait
What's important is to make the best of the situation and continue to support him, because he can now convert Maga into a stronger civil society and business force, and recruit international allegiances
He's actually a populist leftist who started out as part of the "omg Trump is Hitler" crowd, even writing a book
But after getting elected he pulled a reverse Bernie Sanders, realizing some of his earlier hysteria was just based on wrong information, and they became friends
Trump also apparently liked that AMLO is an outsider
Plus the Mexican "right" is pretty useless with neocons (like Vincent fox)
Oliver Stone did, yes, but Stone also likes Assange
Snowden also got attacked for rt'ing Veritas footage about Assange
https://www.rt.com/usa/509889-project-veritas-assange-pardon/
He got "denied extradition", but two days later the judge made sure he got denied bail as well, while the US "appeals" that decision
So the judge clearly expects to reinstate charges with Biden
Not if the charges are hidden/classified, which they literally were until 2019
https://apnews.com/article/dfd74baf6b2f46c28d7b22138f59c034
Judge refuses to unseal criminal charges against Assange By MATTHEW BARAKAT
January 30, 2019
He only has charges in the US, which is why the UK was going to hold him until extraditing him
And the UK judge only denied extradition to discourage a Trump pardon, you can tell the denial was disingenuous because he got denied bail
This is a step forward for equality
He can still pardon him now, which is important since Julian formally requested a pardon in December 2020
I interpreted that statement as blaming fedposters/subversives for being responsible for creating and weaponizing "hate"
This is one of the very few incidents I agree with being classified as terrorism
That's not true, his extradition has only been stopped for now
He's still in jail, he's not free, and the basis of that imprisonment is the US charges
Tucker also refused to vote for Bush in 2004 due to feeling betrayed over wmd claims
The MI secretary of state said something similar
What they MEAN is one of two things
1- that Joe Biden owns all black people, and everyone else by extension, therefore challengers ain't actually black
2- that they have a largely black election fraud apparatus, the same way the film American Gangster shows a black gang operation moving heroin from Vietnam to america
The reason the Black gang moving heroin was so successful was that they had a tight knit culture that effectively prevented leaks from getting out to Feds
It was this black nationalist success in preventing infiltrators that led the Feds to start funding absolutely retarded antisocial "black activists" like the Kwanzaa creator to overtake and collapse the productive elements of those movements
I got some links on fake ufo shit
"Project Palladium" radarr spoofing
Videos of UFOs are generally army test devices (small fast moving disc's) explicitly designed to be as hard as possible to track with radarr
Hence we only see them from (our) navy ships,