Not everyone has the right to vote. For example, illegal aliens and minors don't. Further, nobody has the right to vote more than once, or for another person.
Proving that you are who you claim to be and that you actually have the right to vote isn't a barrier. It's common sense.
Let's not forget global mega-corporations!
I would ask all these corporations to give examples of people who could vote under the previous laws, but not the new ones.
So it was a literal black supremacist? Somehow I don't think we're going to hear about how we have a black supremacy problem.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. 🤷♂️
"Ordinary folks that I grew up with" 🤣
I wouldn't brag about knowing an insurrection agent in 2021.
"Dominion supports all audits by people accredited by government agencies that we lobby with."
I'll be out of town next week so I won't be able to make it.
Pickens, so close but a county nobody actually cares about.
I still haven't done anything yet. But the county convention is coming up and I'm now able to vote in that.
It was the easiest thing. I literally just showed up. I was the only person there from my precinct, so I got it by default.
I like to think it's because I went to my county precinct reorganization meeting and became the precinct chairman. I know it's not, but I like to think it.
But you don't understand! The Russians hacked the insecure voting machines and made them switch votes because our election security is a joke! Also, they used social media/propaganda to force people to vote for Drumpf!
They 👏 have 👏 insurance👏
A perfectly legitimate action of people who have done no wrong and have nothing to hide.
But seriously, there has to be a threshold at which point this nonsense is considered an admission of guilt.
Ban knive pls.
Tell me again why we shouldn't confront Democrats where they eat, where they sleep, and where they work until they stop being complicit in the destruction of our democracy.
If posted that on twitter I would be labeled a far-right fascist domestic terrorist.
The excuse for weighted votes would be that they designed it to work for a broad range of usages. I think example you would see is in an election where you can choose multiple candidates.
For example, you might be able to pick your top 4 candidates out of a list of 20. Then mayne your vote is weighted as: 1 for your 1st choice .75 for your 2nd choice .5 for your 3rd choice .25 for your 4th choice
Does that mean that how the software works makes sense? I couldn't say. The point is that they can explain why it's like that. That's why we need to ask the questions I mentioned. Because even if they can explain why the option exists, they need to explain why it was used at all.
As for adjudication, one of the officials from Georgia (I forget who) said that 90% of the mail in ballots had gone to adjudication. He didn't say that explicitly. He gave the number of mail in ballots (around 100k) and the amount that had gone to adjudication (around 90k).
I personally think adjudication is one of the main vectors of fraud. It seems like the system is basically designed to be able to choose the "correct" candidate via forcing ballots into adjudication, and then batch adjudicating.
Don't just ask why there are weighted counts. They have an explanation for that. It's supposedly for elections where you can vote for multiple candidates for the same office. So you can vote for candidate A as your first choice, B as your second choice, etc.
What needs to be asked is: Was that option in use (fractional votes suggests yes)?
Who set the system up to use that option in an election where it's not used?
Where the election officials aware of the option and it's use? If not, why weren't they aware? If yes, why did they allow it?
I think the most important aspect of the machines to ask about and draw people's attention to is adjudication and how the recounts are done.
Why is the system able to adjudicate in batches?
Why does it store the adjudicated version as the image for that ballot (pretty sure that's how it works, if not let me know)? This is a serious thing since many (all?) of the recounts that were done used the printed ballot images from the machines.
What oversight is there for the adjudication process? The election worker can completely change your vote, and there's no way to know without a hand count of the original ballots. So what process is in place to make sure that doesn't happen.
Why where the had recounts of the original ballots in New Hampshire stopped when they found a 6% discrepancy between from the machine count? Why isn't that enough evidence to warrant hand recounts of the original ballots everywhere tabulation machines were used?
Globalism literally causes pandemics.
But how responsible for others am I? My coworkers are bad with their finances. Is it my duty to protect them from creditors? How can I do that? Should I steal their credit cards? Should I take charge of their finances entirely? It's not just debt they need to be protected from. None of them are preparing for retirement. Am I responsible for making sure that they have money to retire?
Honestly, they're all idiots. It would be best for them if I dictated their entire lives. That way I could make sure nobody takes advantage of them.
It would be even more diverse if the 50% of men also declared themselves to be transwomen.
Marxism is Islam for bourgeoisie white people. That's why leftists act the way they do. They're religious zealots convinced they're bringing heaven to earth.
The guys whose ideas haven't worked a single time they've been implemented and have led to mass poverty, starvation, and murder? Those guys?
Marxism, and all its children ideologies, are Islam for the white bourgeoisie.
"So we need to remain locked down forever since the vaccine may not work."