The Democrats hated that Americans loved Reagan. President Trump is a smarter, more streetwise President than Reagan, but both share a love for America and an inner conviction that cannot be shaken by outside criticism.
Public education has become a curse for America under the Democrats. All the money allocated for public education should be divided out so that parents can choose schools they trust, and take the power away from these communists.
Pulmonologist, cardiologist, nephrologist etc - you can bet there is an entire team of doctors who specialize in various aspects of care, all of them consulting with each other. Not because something is wrong, but to make sure everything stays headed in the right direction.
With a typical patient, the hospitalist on duty would consult with specialists as needed. In the case of President Trump, I am certain they are frequently collaborating to make sure they catch any signs of potential downturn and try and prevent them.
My book is older, and read around the world, and it has never changed. Your books change every 15-20 years.
God there is just something so special about idiocy applied to logic.
Don't confuse a disagreement with an idea, with a fault in logic. Consistency is the what the person you are replying to is referencing. I don't agree with young Earth theory, and do not doubt the scientific version of how old the Earth is. However, I also know that the advance in modern science was made possible by the Christian belief that there is one truth and that the truth is unchanging.
Consider this - does the speed of light vary by season? Do the laws of physics change from time to time? Do we expect those laws to remain the same? We do. We expect that our understanding of them may change. Science has a reliable process for testing ideas. Logic isn't one of them. Experimentation and data supplant logic. Does quantum physics make any sense? Absolutely not. Is the vast majority (95-96%) of the universe composed of something that we don't understand at all? The likelihood of dark matter and dark energy is a perfect example that every time we think we understand how it all works, there is another layer of complexity we haven't even scratched.
People trusting the Bible more than they trust science is perfectly logical. Do you trust President Trump more than you trust Fauci on Coronavirus? While, I and a lot of people do not see the Bible as God's complete explanation of everything, some people do. Some don't trust some scientific claims because they don't really have a way that they can personally verify them. Science itself thinks the same way - a theory must be falsifiable and anyone is free to doubt it and test it out.
Some people are legal experts. Some have expertise in engineering, mathematics, construction, agriculture or any of the numerous other fields of knowledge. Because we are inundated with scientific articles, and because science is popular and held in wide regard - we all presume to be near experts in science when we talk with one another.
While you and I might not doubt that the speed of light is a constant, when Einstein proposed his theory of relativity, it was not so widely accepted. If God had wanted to tell us how He made the giraffe and why 1/137* would make everything possible, He would have done so. Instead, God told Job that humans are not remotely ready to understand and do the kinds of things that God can do, and therefore should not try to judge God's motives or actions.
Science is not the truth. It is not intended to be the truth. It is the best set of explanations we have so far that we can test. Doubting science isn't bad. Doubting and testing science is, in fact, how science has made its advances. The far east should have discovered science long before the west did. The ancient philosophers should have discovered science long ago. They didn't because they had no reason to think that the universe was fixed. Christianity did. People firmly believed God made the world one certain way, and it was their job to discover that way. The concept you mocked was the concept that made science possible.
Learn to take religion/science discussions in terms of people with differing backgrounds discussing something no one is really an expert on. Existential conversations are merely that. The discussion may get passionate, but either side thinking the other person is wrong is just wrong, and both sides have a historical and logical right to disagree. If you just read that last sentence as two wrongs make a right, then you understand how tortuous this subject is.
Hope you have a good day, and when you get into these kinds of discussions keep this in mind: https://i.imgur.com/F4Iz3yE.jpg
President Trump tweets out: "These vaccines are great, the best, really. We are going to be giving them to Democrats only the first two years - you can trust the vacccine."
Then watch everyone flip out and propose laws to let people opt out.
The Amish American in the photo is wearing the mask Schumer Style
https://www.pacificpundit.com/2020/04/09/stupid-cryin-chuck-schumer-doesnt-know-how-to-properly-wear-mask-either/
At work, we are required to wear fit tested n95s or CAPRs (powered air purifying system) with any hi risk Covid patients. Despite this, and wearing protective gowns, gloves, hand washing and hand sanitizer, we still have the occasional staff that get sick with Covid.
Masks are not a cure all. The typical cloth masks offer limited protection for a brief period of time. The Democrats have a mask fetish because they like to control others. President Trump didn't suddenly start wearing masks less in the past week. The only real change for Trump was the debate. It is more likely that the people handling the debate exposed the president to Covid than anything else.
He doesn't realize that, hence his comment.