Sadly in the United Kingdom there is no constitution. The "Supreme Court" is merely the highest level appeals court and has no power to strike down legislation.
He's clearly referring to "reproductive services" i.e. contraception and abortion reducing the population.
He's clearly referring to "reproductive services" i.e. contraception and abortion reducing the population.
I personally have a lot of concerts about these new vaccines. However this article is anti-vax nonsense and has not relation to the current situation. The idea that Bill Gates "accidentally" revealed his plan to commit mass genocide with a vaccine in a speech and hoped no one would notice is just laughable.
Initially Trump was happy to have any help he could get. They needed to get election fraud in the press and Sidney Powell was perfect for that. However they started to realise that she was more interested in fame than critical examination of the evidence and many of her claims were overblown and counterproductive so they started distancing her. They are doing it softly because having a big feud with her would damage their own credibility.
OK. Once you have evidence of a legally defined "war crime" this will be relevant.
In a democratic society police officers don't get to make up the law as they go along. It's all fun and games for you until you get shot by an antifa sympathising cop acting on their own interpretation of what they think should happen.
The Wehrmacht comparison is ridiculous. Obviously you might expect them to refuse clearly unlawful orders, but the whole system would collapse if individual cops got to choose whether or not they thought every order they were given. "seemed fair".
What's Twitter?
"Official sources" was always a lie. No official source has called the election.
I think you misunderstand Socialism. They don't steal from you because it is "fair".
Fundamentally we need police officers who do what they're told otherwise the whole system breaks down. It's the politicians who need to change.
Police officers HAVE to follow the orders of their superiors. They may not like it, but they don't get to choose.
When did I say I'm a centrist or neutral? I strongly support Trump. But in any situation I will never "pick a side" for the sake of it. I will only support what I think is right. That could be "a side" or I could be the only person who holds that view.
What a bizarre thing to say. Of course having sympathy for one individual doesn't negate the suffering and murder of millions of people.
I'm not ambivalent. I support Trump because he agrees with what I agree with. If he didn't I wouldn't have a side at all. Corrupt RINOs have been coasting on "pick a side" for too long.
I agree about the simping, but "demanding arrests" is pointless. Either Trump has 4D chessed enough to defeat the Deep State and win the election or he hasn't. Join protests, submit evidence if you have it personally, but most of what we have to do is just "wait and see".
Yes, stand for something. But if that something means you stand alone, so be it. It doesn't have to be one of the preordained "sides".
As much as I have sympathy towards the man, no, surviving great hardship like that does not give him automatic moral or intellectual authority.
Support Trump for Trump's sake. Not for choosing a side. There was a time when Trump wasn't "a side". The sides were establishment GOP and establishment Dems, supporting Trump then meant standing alone.
To be fair, he is notorious for playing around.
Well, that's some Marxist bullshit right there. In some situations both sides are nuts.
Fair point about labelling. But a lot of people on this site are getting frustrated with the posting of poorly vetted information. 10% accuracy is not acceptable to them.
I didn't even consider this. Wearing a mask... in a posed photograph.