I blamed that on glare from the flash. Between the harsh light on his forehead and the oversaturated white on his left shoulder and knee, all of which are directly facing the camera, I suspect a flash was used. The watch faces the camera too (or very close), so it’s easy to imagine it would glare.
Huh... he’s wearing the Buddhist red string on his wrist.
Woah... Trump really retweeted Styx? What next, the edgy kid that posts similar content? Anyone remember her name? I kind of forgot about her.
I get what you’re saying, but she didn’t say kiddie porn. The IT guy actually explicitly said there wasn’t kid porn on there. Not that it didn’t happen, and it doesn’t mean he isn’t into it, but there’s a difference between content that suggests an “underage obsession” and underage porn.
Even a rumor of this kind of thing would cost someone their security clearance in a review because of their susceptibility to blackmail and manipulation. Imagine that person being the POTUS
Maybe Wikileaks is his trusted friend.
That’s not enough uptrumps. Should I be concerned?
He was Probably happy to get out of the line light before things got spicier for him.
They can’t be both delicate flowers and hardy warriors. You can be good at one, the other, or bad at both.
Of course they did.
Pretty weak reason when there is even a potential of this swinging some voters. I think it will some, though admittedly not most. Clearly you don’t. That’s okay. I‘d challenge though you to look up viewership for this nomination vs most. I’ll bet it’s way higher than is typical, which means messages they convey will be reached by more than you think. It’s actually important to counter the leftist narrative. That’s one of the biggest wins of this Presidency, is causing a rupture in the Leftist domination of the narrative. We’re actually making ground... this isn’t the time to give it up because “the MSM will slice and dice“ it all anyway.
You asked if I thought they would, not if I thought they were technically capable. Just my opinion. I think it would be terrible optics for them if they went that far, and Democrats VERY much care about what narrative is out there.
You’re making a case that it doesn’t help for them to use the full time they are allotted, but I have yet to hear any case that it helps anything for them to give up their time. The Democrats will have as much time to sound stupid, whether or not Republicans yield their time. Why is it such an issue to you they they are doing what is standard procedure? It doesn’t move the vote forward. What are you hoping will happen if they break SOP?
It’s her personal account. They may lock Trump’s personal account, but not his POTUS account.
I realize it can be boring watching the plodding Senatorial pace, but there are some great points being made, and if you think the Republican questions didn’t give ACB a chance to shine and get a great many people hyped about her (and more importantly to Nov 3, Trump’s choice of her), then you weren’t listening. Senate is by design even slower moving than the House, if you dig into the original purposes of these two units.
Dan Bongino
To what effect? If they give up their voices, surrender their time since “the msm will slice and dice anyway” (which btw is the opposite of what Trump does), and shorten their time, what will have been accomplished?
You say almost nothing but complain about Republicans yielding their time, yet you’re here through the entire process. Is someone paying you to make these comments?
Yield your keyboard.
He might have agreed with peers to use his segment to let her recover and relax a bit.
Hahaha, he just called out Harris for being a racist.
Chicken Fried Steak with Mashed potatoes and sweet tea.
She didn’t. Not even remotely. Why are you pulling a Democrat tactic and putting words in her mouth? Rewind and listen to her exact words again.
Lol, well done! Beautiful answer untwisting the conflation in Harris’ questions. That tactic trips up so many generally smart people.
Thank you! That’s the one. She’s really smart, has an interesting perspective, but definitely has issues. Good for an occasional watch, but to focus entirely on her content would be a path to your own emotional issues.