No matter how many times the state courts “cuck” us, we can still end up at a scotus hearing after following all the procedure (climbing the ladder of courts).
Just because scotus said Texas doesn’t have standing to sue PA etc doesn’t mean they’ll say the same about Trump’s personal election contest. He does have standing because he is the specific candidate that was defrauded by this.
Back to scotus, precedent matters above all in case law, sometimes even constitutionality sadly.
If scotus rules in the MI or PA (or any state from the TX lawsuit) hearing that only the state legislature can/could have/should have changed election law and procedure (as laid out in the constitution) then the same ruling would affect every state that used a non-legislative route to change their election laws.
The real question is what type of relief, if any, they would provide. And that’s where I’m currently dooming at the moment.
There’s nothing stopping them from going “the state legislature is the only body with the power to change election laws. Keep that in mind next time. Court adjourned”
Which is a violation of law.
All records associated with a federal election must be kept for a period of 22 months.
He makes a strong argument.
When some counties allow “ballot curing” and others don’t, that can easily be interpreted as discrimination between voters. All voters must be treated equally. If some voters have their ballots invalidated because of a missing envelope, but other voters with the same issue are alerted and allowed to come fix their votes to have them validated, that is blatant discrimination.
And that doesn’t even mention the denial of meaningful poll watchers and the like. In direct defiance of court order.
Holy shit, there are probably a hundred + affidavits here, detailing complete breakdowns in procedure and incessant hostility and intimidation towards GOP poll watchers and vote challengers.
It’s way worse than I expected.
I’m just fuckin with you. You asked a question and I answered it.
Chill out bud.
Idk about “nobody is going to get in trouble for anything”. Maybe they won’t, I don’t know.
But didn’t trump just do this a few weeks ago?
My brother’s baby mama went to jail for DUI in July.
Be more specific with your requests homie
I watched it earlier before YouTube crashed
The investigators definitely say some shady shit (“I am here to scare you” and “I’m here to harness the storm” which I interpret as “get control of the narrative” and the investigators imply veritas is more concerned about story exclusivity than helping the whistleblower) but all that really happens is they convince him to update his affidavit to be more factual.
For example, whistleblower says he only overheard part of a conversation that led him to believe the discussion was about backdating ballots.
In his Veritas affidavit (that veritas lawyers wrote up and he signed), it reads as if he explicitly heard them discussing backdating ballots.
So the investigators and the whistleblower make an updated statement that specified that he didn’t explicitly hear about backdating ballots, but he reached that “logical assumption” based on what he DID hear and the directions of his superiors to collect ballots for days after the election and separate them from the regular mail-stream and turn them over directly to the supervisor.
So instead of an affidavit saying “I heard them discussing criminal activity” there is now a statement that says “I heard them discussing something that led me to believe there was criminal activity”.
Idk how the mainstream media claims that he completely recanted his claims, because nowhere in the recording does he backtrack on what he ever said: “I heard some suspicious shit and assumed it was nefarious in nature” (my paraphrase)
I actually joined TD back in 2018 before we were kicked from reddit. Was pretty involved with comments and stuff (my highest upvoted post on reddit was my TD post about my walk away moment).
When we were purged from there, I got very blackpilled over the control big tech has and just lurked here every now and then.
The election bullshit finally pushed me over the edge and I came here and created an account to start participating again.
It’s good to be back to the never-ending Trump rally!
Nothing really goes to SCOTUS before passing through lesser (local) courts first.
I expect even if Trump wins in local court, dems will appeal to the next level. If Trump loses in local court, he will appeal to the next level.
This will continue until it reaches SCOTUS
Just downloaded it after a suggestion from another pede, seems to work and it’s free. Will keep it around
Just downloaded it, seems to work pretty well. Thanks for the info
Seems to be that Pluto only has OAN Encore, which shows past broadcasts and doesn’t show their live footage/shows.
Definitely a caveat worth mentioning, but will keep it around for commentary
I have considered a chromecast for phone casting but it’s such a niche use that I haven’t bit the bullet on it yet. I do feel it’s inevitably gonna happen though just for the convenience in situations like this. But at the same time, fuck google, ya know?
Is Pluto free?
Unfortunately I cannot. Streaming iPhone to LG Smart TVs wasn’t implemented until the 2019 model of LG and I have a 2018 model.
Idk, Newsmax wins out for me because I can actually watch it. They have an app for LG Smart TVs. I don’t have nor do I want a cable subscription, and OANN doesn’t have an app that I can download straight to my TV.
Hand recount, using the paper ballots. Audit them too.
Every dominion county needs to do what GA is doing
You sue the voting software creators for access to the software. You then check to see if algorithms can be applied (via internet download possibly, like we’ve seen people claim that machines were connected to the internet for an update the night before the election).
If it’s possible that algorithms can be added, or if you find proof that algorithms were in fact added, then you’ve got your case right there that fraud was more likely than not perpetrated.
Then a judge can decide recourse. Redo election, throw out results, they can figure something out
No “widespread” voter fraud, but just enough voter fraud in concentrated areas to undo the results of the election. A handful of glitches here, a few denied poll watchers there, a few hundred thousand late mail-in ballots there, and you’ve got a new “winner”.
But it’s not widespread because we only had to do it in like 10% of the states to change the result on a national level.
Is it up to the SCOTUS to charge them with anything?
I think that’s completely up to DOJ. SCOTUS could rule that the officials did break the law, but I still don’t think current DOJ would ever charge them with it.
“They didn’t intend to break the law”