3
MisterGuapo 3 points ago +3 / -0

There is no microchip, but there is a proposal to have an injectable microchip that will detect and eliminate the virus before you show any symptoms.

Was in the news earlier this week, I believe. Or last week at the latest.

1
MisterGuapo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Russian invades Ukraine and prosecutes Biden for quid pro quo. Media now has a reason to deny that Biden even did quid pro quo when he was VP, despite video evidence to the contrary.

1
MisterGuapo 1 point ago +1 / -0

The nice thing though is, at least where I shop, I'm not forced to wait for a specific terminal to open up - I get to use the first one available. So, it somebody is taking their time on Terminal 6, I still have a good chance of getting to one of Terminals 1-5 if I'm next in line.

7
MisterGuapo 7 points ago +7 / -0

That's a pretty attractive woman who knows what's going on.

And the accent...that just makes her more attractive.

2
MisterGuapo 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, they can't. If they're vaccinated or developed natural immunity, the body reacts and gets rid of the virus before it can build any appreciable quantity inside the person. This minimizes the chance of "asymptomatic spread".

4
MisterGuapo 4 points ago +4 / -0

I love self-checkout. I can process and bag my items more efficiently than a store employee.

With regular checkout, you can get stuck behind stupid customers who take forever or argue with the cashier or whatever. My ex used to stand there while the cashier scanned items, then waited to hear the cost BEFORE opening her purse and getting out her money. Did you think they were going to say, "Hey, take this! You don't need to pay today!"

8
MisterGuapo 8 points ago +8 / -0

Agreed. I was in my mid-20s at the time. If that would have happened, it would have been HUGE news.

11
MisterGuapo 11 points ago +12 / -1

I'm sure "fact checkers" would say the same thing!

"Don't be silly! What you're saying is false! It's not female sterilization, it just causes inferfility!"

3
MisterGuapo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Excellent work - it's statistically significant!

I have a bit of a math and science background, so I don't concern myself with the zeroes - I look at the ratio!

Thank you for doing that!

2
MisterGuapo 2 points ago +2 / -0

I agree. To blindly say "Humans aren't contributing" is more rhetoric than anything.

I posted higher up in the thread. I don't think it's close to what people think. There are other more substantive causes (like solar fluctuations).

People are being fooled into accepting the premise that global warming is bad. How do we know it's bad? We've had warm periods in the past where they grew grapes in England and we know areas were warmer up North because the permafrost contains the remains of plants from a warmer time.

1
MisterGuapo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely humans are contributing. So are cows. And fish. And birds. And trees. And everything else on the planet as well as that big ball in the sky called The Sun. Not to mention cosmic rays, which can affect cloud formation (and thus allow heat to enter or escape). Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, but it's not the dominant greenhouse gas - that would be water vapor.

The real question is to WHAT DEGREE are humans contributing? 100%? 50%? 10%? 1%? 0.00001%?

Now, have humans contributed negatively or positively? There are more trees on Earth now that there were 120 years ago because forest fires don't run as rampant as they used to (unless you live in California). We grow efficient crops that gobble up carbon dioxide more efficiently than would wild plants. Plenty of effects everywhere.

That's where science comes in and is failing us. Because some scientists play with the numbers and thus give inaccurate perceptions of what's happening.

Chances are our effects aren't as much as many would like to believe (and probably by a long shot), but blindly saying humans aren't contributing is not a proper statement.

2
MisterGuapo 2 points ago +2 / -0

How about a simple percentage? X% of vaccinations have resulted in deaths and compare that to previous years' percentages.

3
MisterGuapo 3 points ago +3 / -0

Typical size for a canal. Canals aren't much bigger than the ships that pass through it.

4
MisterGuapo 4 points ago +4 / -0

Exactly. Reporters used to look for evidence for the stuff about which they were reporting. Now this guy was just parroting what he heard elsewhere to O'Keefe.

6
MisterGuapo 6 points ago +6 / -0

I don't know if they teach it, but it's a way to get somebody to continue talking. You let them talk and keep talking with the hopes that you will get them to say something you can use against them.

2
MisterGuapo 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looked up the video online and it's amazing how all the adults at the front of the classroom clapped after the kid rewrote it with the "e".

Quayle got burned because of their incompetence.

5
MisterGuapo 5 points ago +5 / -0

My understanding is that the funds being used for this are coming from a private foundation.

2
MisterGuapo 2 points ago +2 / -0

This guy came to the US in 2002, when he was a child.

Regardless, he was indoctrinated to hate whites.

view more: Next ›