People don’t realize, CO2 is a trace atmospheric gas. For all the dire hysteria, it only constitutes between 250-400 parts per MILLION. There is presently more Argon in our atmosphere than CO2. It is that insignificant.
And CO2 is necessary for all plant life ... and all food and oxygen ... on this planet. It is a naturally arising atmospheric component, not a “pollutant”.
CO2 is a complete red herring. Ask a climate zealot to tell you the actual concentration, and they run for cover.
If people ever knew the actual science and data, they would be stringing up every ‘climate scientist’. They are hucksters, and the private laughingstock of real scientists.
If real scientists had a public voice, solar physicists, people would be terrified at what’s coming. And they’ve been quietly projecting what’s coming for over two decades now. Sunspots are the clue. Magnetic flux events trending below thresholds. Penn and Livingston. Cycle 25 will be non existent. They were right.
All natural periodic oscillations of our star, but they dramatically affect this planet.
Solar magnetic field weakening, resulting cosmic ray influences on Earth’s atmosphere increasing. Cosmic ray intensity affects Earth’s upper atmosphere, blocking normal wavelength radiation from reaching the surface. Why are the poles so much colder? Because Earth’s defecting magnetic field is weakest there. And the sun’s magnetic field extends far past Pluto. And it is now weakening, as it does every few centuries, if sunspot records are a guide.
We’re standing on the threshold of another Maunder Minimum. It has just started. The last one caused a 75 year mini ice age throughout the 17th Century.
The 21st Century is going to be a cold one.
But instead, politicized charlatans masquerading as climate ‘scientists’ have humanity as ill prepared as possible. Based on gigantic lies. They and their political handlers should all be tried and hanged for crimes against humanity, for the millions of deaths their giant lies are going to cost in the coming decades.
Over 80 million? Probably closer to 100 million. Hard to purge the majority.
Let's not lose sight of the electoral reality. Trump won.
The reality is they are a political minority, and terrified of a unified MAGA Bloc.
Cut the damn cables, including OTA, with an axe. It’s pure brain cancer. Minimal Internet where you control what comes in, and what goes out.
Stock up on the healthy media you like: old TV shows, movies, audio, whatever. Buy it, own it, in durable format. And stream it off a hdd locally, to the player(s) of your choice. Be independent and self-contained.
And get outside more, and read more books. Including the Bible. Fresh air, fresh healthy thoughts.
Commercial mass media in 2020 is designed to keep you hysterical and brainwashed to your own demise.
We were at a larger hospital in a ground-zero lockdown major metro region this past month.
The ICU was nearly empty.
The ER had two people in it, one complaining of a bellyache. Lots of empty beds. Staff were mainly standing around, and making phone calls.
Meanwhile, all the fake news waiting room TVs were hysterically wailing on about the 'covid surge'.
It is all fake.
Not enough to justify the relative temperature differences from lower latitudes. And the relative solar distance differential from lower latitudes does not support the temperature differences, either. At a mean distance of 1au, a 4-5,000 mile difference presents virtually no difference in surface irradiation levels. The angular approach differences of direct solar emissions measured at the poles is similarly insufficient for the resulting temperature differences.
Right now, the emerging hypothesis for the very strong statistical correlation between historical sunspot counts and global temperature changes is a degraded solar heliospheric magnetic field, and the resulting increase in cosmic ray intrusion into Earth’s atmosphere. And that those increased particle impacts increases high altitude atmospheric filtering effects of the sun’s otherwise fairly stable irradiated output. This hypothesis is still being tested, but appears to so far explain what is happening.
In laymen’s’ terms, increased cosmic ray activity is increasing the filtering of the Sun’s radiant emission in the upper atmosphere. Less composite solar emissions are reaching the surface. And unlike Venus, Earth does not possess a 96% CO2 blanket. Our predominantly Nitrogen atmosphere has a poor relative thermal retention factor. There is no meaningful greenhouse effect here.
Most cosmic ray particles do not reach Earth’s surface. What we detect at sea level are the secondary particle emissions after cosmic particles have already exploded into upper atmosphere elements. The relative nuclear force possessed by incoming cosmic particles is fantastic. They are ‘naked’ atoms (stripped of electrons) traveling nearly at the speed of light.
Cosmic ray research as early as the 1950s has indicated deleterious secondary atmospheric effects, and that planetary magnetic fields provide the greatest local particle defection, and the least secondary atmospheric consequences, at the equator. It is obvious that the Sun provides a broader magnetic deflection effect at heliosphere ranges, further protecting the planets from cosmic particle activity.
More importantly, the magnetic heliosphere cosmic ray hypothesis demonstrates two other things. Firstly, that human activity is completely irrelevant to these causes; stellar activities across our galaxy and involving our own star determine planetary temperatures. Man has nothing to do with it.
And secondly, that the common debunking claim made by AGW proponents that the Sun’s irradiated emissions do not appreciably change is also a red herring argument; it is not irradiated direct emissions that are involved, it is the less-considered extended magnetic field strength of the Sun that is at issue. And the latter does oscillate considerably over extended time frames. And right now, it is entering into a degraded minimum phase. Cosmic ray activity into our solar system is increasing.
All of this is probably too much for what is a political discussion board. But the scientific complexities involved (in solar and advanced particle physics, electromagnetic systems, chemistry, biology and atmospheric sciences) underscore the fact that climate ‘science’ is more political dogma bordering on a religion than the application of multidisciplinary hard sciences or the scientific method.
Sadly, today’s generations are taught what to think, rather than how to think, in these areas.