The vaccine is not the problem. And cutting off people who get it is not the answer. The problem is that we have a potentially man made virus literally killing hundreds of thousands of us and our government doesn't care about the source or facts.
The Biden administration has purposefully undermined faith in the vaccine because it keeps us confused and feeling powerless.
Also, my best friends husband is literally on ECMO fighting for his 38 year old life because of Covid. She had the sniffles, he got pneumonia. It's real. Responsible people with kids can decide that getting vaccinated is the best way for them to keep their family safe. The vaccine was made under a Trump program for goodness sake. The problem is only that the new administration and some companies want to use the vaccine as a tool of control. But don't let that determine whether you get it or not. Let facts about the virus and the vaccine guide you.
This week I've watched my best friend's 38 year old husband fight for his life with this virus. They are conservatives who live in a rural town. They have no agenda. He was on a ventilator for three days and remains on ECMO.
President Trump made the vaccine happen and has promoted it.
It does not rewrite your DNA. It provides information that allows your immune system to respond to a virus it doesn't even have to come into contact with directly. I also don't trust that big pharma has my best interests in mind. I do believe they have their own in mind, and nothing this vaccine would endanger any of their legacies - they can't afford that.
And fear mongering is not helpful, no matter which side is doing it.
Please stop with this. mRNA vaccines are literally bringing the code for recognizing the virus, not rewriting DNA. Regular vaccines have normally required a live or dead virus itself to help our immune system recognize it. (Like a hound sniffing out a person it knows.) The mRNA vaccines are basically the equivalent of a hound sniffing the missing person's sweater and then going on to follow their scent and find them.
The "rewriting" is the same in both types of vaccines, if you can call it that. Our white blood cells learn how to identify the virus and are therefore prepped and ready to attack it upon future exposure.
The one real problem I see is that some people have a very strong immune response. I myself had about 24 hours of fever and chills, muscle aches, and malaise.
I don't doubt there are many more reactions than with a normal vaccine. And I also believe that it could cause severe issues in the elderly and infirm. I don't want my 78 year old grandmother having to go through what I did.
I don't buy this. I'm in healthcare and most of us in my company got the vaccine. I want going to at first, but weighed everything out and took the plunge. Obviously everyone had to choose for themselves what they do. The first shot was asking to the flu shot... Sore arm for a day. The second, though, did cause me to have symptoms: chills, hour flashes, low grade fever, and general malaise that lasted for about 18 hours. Some folks had no symptoms at all. No one died or even became severely ill. I was one of the last to get it because I was pretty skeptical and didn't think there were enough studies. So I was watching everyone else like a hawk.
I'm not sold that the vaccine is a save all, or that it's as necessary as they would have you believe, but I also don't think it's the enemy itself. The vaccine is just a tool. It can still be used for political goals and as part of information warfare, but it was not made to kill. Mainly because the makers of these vaccines have nothing to gain from killing people. But they have a lot to gain from being the first and best on the market to successfully eradicate this virus.
That's quite a leap away from evidence. If blunt force trauma was a contributing factor to his death, the ME would note it. If they can't connect the actions of the people accused with his death, then they can't convict them.
Criminalizing speech. This is bad. Does any single private citizen owe a legal duty of honesty to other private citizens passively receiving a communication? Apparently so. Our politicians can lie to us but we will be prosecuted for lying to reach other in jest. That is scary.
I cannot wait to wear my double mask to work (have to wear one anyway) and then explain to everyone who asks that Supreme Being Fauci recommends it. I think it will click then for some folks just how image this has gotten.
So... Can't hear the issue before the election because it's not ripe. Can't hear it right after the election because standing? And can't hear after the election because it's a moot issue. When exactly should they be hearing these cases?