1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

"It prevents the egg from... implanting." Thus killing a living human being. Human life begins at conception. That is when you have the unique new genetic code and all signs of life are present. Preventing implantation is killing a fertilized egg.

1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +2 / -1

You are pregnant the moment the egg is fertilized, which is one of the ways Plan B works. If you haven't ovulated yet it delays ovulation. If you have ovulated, it thins the lining of the uterus, preventing implantation of the fertilized egg, which is abortion. There is no way, as of now, to tell which is happening when you take it. It's a game of chance whether or not a living human being is destroyed.

1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +2 / -1

It works in two ways. It delays ovulation (if ovulation has not already happened), which is a contraceptive measure. It also thins the lining of the uterus, which allows conception if ovulation has already happened, but prevents implantation of the fertilized egg, which is an abortifacient measure. So it is an abortion pill.

1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Particularly if you're using some system to block the ads.

2
ModernKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

Constitutionally DACA shouldn't have been allowed in the first place. Trump should have been able to remove an executive order with another executive order, which is completely constitutional, but Roberts fucked us over and prevented it. Now the Supreme Court decided to start following the Constitution and say Biden can use an executive order to remove an executive order. It's more "rules for thee, but not for me" BS.

1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah, I started making flatbreads for myself due to the cost increase, I need to start up some yeast cultures so I can do regular bread too.

6
ModernKnight 6 points ago +6 / -0

I believe I can fly...

Getting kids straight from the FBI!

I think about it every night and day

Because pedos hold so much sway.

They won't kick in my door.

No-knocks only go after the poor.

I believe I can fly...

16
ModernKnight 16 points ago +16 / -0

Those are excuses they use. The true reasons are much older and more brutal. Child sacrifice. Consequence free actions. The search for immortality (and don't try to tell me fetal stem cell research isn't just that).

9
ModernKnight 9 points ago +9 / -0

I haven't read the opinion yet, but going on what I've been hearing I believe this is the case. It stops the EPA from implementing the Green New Deal without a bill from Congress, but if they pass a bill it will be enforced.

7
ModernKnight 7 points ago +7 / -0

It's where they were sent by the feds when they came here. The feds wanted to "diversify" and "culturally enrich" that otherwise very white area.

5
ModernKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's what I thought. I enjoy being surrounded by guns. Got 2 in arm's reach right now.

12
ModernKnight 12 points ago +12 / -0

Such a bigoted take, when one of them could be working using your stolen SS number, allowing the IRS to demand you pay taxes on his income in addition to yours.

3
ModernKnight 3 points ago +3 / -0

My freedom boner would be so big it would make Big Mike jealous if that happened.

5
ModernKnight 5 points ago +5 / -0

It really doesn't make sense, and it infuriates me. The ATF, EPA, and FDA are particularly aggressive with this (most recently the ATF claiming that forced reset triggers are "machine guns," despite literally not meeting the definition of "machine gun" in the NFA [itself unconstitutional]).

2
ModernKnight 2 points ago +2 / -0

So it's another wealth transfer from taxpayers to certain government-chosen winners. Huzzah. I feel so happy that the money isn't leaving the country.

3
ModernKnight 3 points ago +4 / -1

Finland is part of the EU. They joined in 1995. You're probably thinking of Norway, which has refused to join so far.

41
ModernKnight 41 points ago +41 / -0

The Finnish government welcomed the Mohammedans, but the Mohammedans decided they would rather return home than deal with Finnish winters. So Finland cucked, but the weather did what the natives should have.

52
ModernKnight 52 points ago +56 / -4

Some faggots are downvoting you, but it's true. The Court could have ruled that agencies can only enforce the specifics of law, and that the federal government does not have the authority to cede power to unelected agencies. They chose the less good option. Similar to the Roe v Wade decision, it's a win for us, but it isn't the total victory it could have been. So celebrate, but we have to keep fighting.

21
ModernKnight 21 points ago +21 / -0

I haven't read the ruling itself yet, but it sounds like we should start the Great Fuckening of the ATF.

1
ModernKnight 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the courts follow the constitution with their ruling it will be a ruling on agencies essentially making new laws with their rules and regulations, so it won't specifically remove any agencies, but would neuter a large number (ATF, EPA, FDA, etc.) but the agencies themselves would still be around and able to enforce laws still on the books. The FBI would be unaffected.

4
ModernKnight 4 points ago +4 / -0

Those plants are held captive in extremely cramped conditions, left open to the elements, and covered in all kinds of chemicals. Upon harvest, the plants are hacked apart without even any sedatives while their children are taken away to be consumed. Future generations are grown in the remains of the previous generation. They are only given dirt and water to eat. Plants grown for food are treated so much worse than animals grown for food. No more eating plants!

view more: Next ›