Not Possible???
There is a whole portable operating system dedicated to doing this and it lives on a USB stick.
Just stick it in any computer and its all yours. Kind of like having a whole computer on your keychain.
They can't keep up.
You can see they don't have a book with millions of voter signature images on their desk.
They would need a computer screen connected to a powerful computer serving up images to many people at the same time. They would also be typing the name or scanning a barcode also to get the image. Or scanning the signature which is a lot slower.
I don't see any of that happening.
I just wish there was a reporter who would say the hell with it I am not supposed to ask this kind of question but I will anyway.
And get them to show the proper procedure and how long it takes and compare it with what actually happened.
It would not be difficult to identify all those people there and get a sworn statement of what exactly happened.
Instead of people who were not there telling you all this has been debunked.
All these supposedly debunking stories I see are very short on details.
I know for sure that someone there told the news organizations that all counting stopped at 10:00 PM because of a burst water pipe and would be started again in the morning.
That was widely reported in the news.
second that notion
I have written a lot of SQL code queries over the years and have never crashed a server.
In the old days with simpler operating systems you could slow the system down and make it seem like it was hanging with crazy queries but that was not the way to crash a system.
And with the more modern multitasking operating systems of today it is more difficult to crash a system on purpose nevermind accidentally.
Director Richard L Barron has trouble remembering what he has said from moment to moment. First he says that the server crash was caused by a Windows SQL Error then he says he does not know what caused the server crash then a few minutes he says that the server crash was caused by a Windows SQL error.
He discusses the suitcase incident (normal procedure) in detail then later in the video claims that this is the first time he has heard about the video.
18:52 I have not seen the video (hidden suitcases pulled from under a table) but my staff says that is normal, thats where they get their ballot assignments.
These are the people who certify the election and they have only a fraction of the knowledge of the people here.
Envelope Opener is now a very important job with specialized training and specialized people to do it.
There are a lot of things that were perfected in places like philadelphia and new york years ago and evidently have now been imported into Georgia.
For instance if there is already a specialized crease in the folding of the paper you do not need to check if the signature or even if the voter name matches the voter rolls. This applies also for certain candidates.
"Their claim basically hinges upon the assertion that these were previously, legally opened ballots"
That in itself is a red flag.
Just common sense basic security. They need to be recorded immediately.
Otherwise this could happen ...
Hey take this box of Trump ballots over there to be scanned and be careful you do not accidentally throw them in the trash.
Nobody told them to leave ???
I heard the news story that night.
A water pipe has broken and the counting for the night has stopped.
Who released that story?
A 23,000 vote dump 98 percent for Biden was released at 2:00 AM
"Did Not find anything unusual"
No need for those ballots to be put in carefully selected piles.
They could have processed the Biden votes first then after they did 2% of the Trump votes decide to go home and throw the rest away.
And you mr secretary of state would have no way of knowing that happened.
Either you are incredible incompetent or you are in on the deal.
Of course no problem there.
Just someone working by themselves in a back room processing absentee ballots. Separating them from envelopes and making decisions on whether this is a valid ballot without anyone there to oversee and check her work.
And it all happens in the middle of the night from midnight to 7:00 AM
We need a song to go along with this. I would call it ...
The ballad of the midnight rigger
Someday Someone is going to put all this together in a step by step movie exposition and that is going to be hilarious - Twitter popping up over and over saying the fraud you are seeing with your own eyes has been disputed.
Its going to create a new word like giving a lewinsky.
When you catch someone lying to you it wiil be...
Don't Twitterize Me.
This is too good
These people definitely have room temperature IQs
Participating in a crime and recording it.
I want to hear GA Secretary of State Brad raffa muffin berger explain how this is standard procedure. Using personal recording devices in an election room.
I thought that was illegal.
I found a story in the Los Angeles Times about how its done
There are machines with software being used but in many places they rely on doing it by hand.
Los Angeles Times signature checking https://www-latimes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-10-28/2020-election-voter-signature-verification?_amp=true&usqp=mq331AQSKAFQApgBidGLybXLlZ0ssAEg&_js_v=a6&_gsa=1#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&csi=0&share=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Fcalifornia%2Fstory%2F2020-10-28%2F2020-election-voter-signature-verification
‘Ripe for error’: Ballot signature verification is flawed — and a big factor in the election
Here’s how signature verification works in many states: An election employee scans the barcode on the ballot envelope, which pulls up the voter’s file on a computer screen. That may include a single signature from a driver’s license or voter registration card, or several signatures that the state has collected over time.
The election worker compares the signatures and makes a decision in as little as five seconds.
If the worker determines the signatures match, the ballot moves on to be counted. If not, the ballot is set aside for further review.
In some populous areas, like Los Angeles County and Clark County, Nev., a computer program takes the first pass at ballots, scanning for possible handwriting mismatches. If a discrepancy is found, the signature is given a second, and sometimes third, look by humans.
But in smaller counties with fewer resources, and in states where mail-in voting wasn’t widespread until this year, election workers rely on their own eyes