19
Moose0528 19 points ago +20 / -1

And my grandfather could not have gotten on a boat to France in the 40s, but he did anyway because he wasn't a pussy.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

If this was a Democrat instead of Trump the media would laud this as a badge of honor and he would instantly be given a Nobel prize.

by JDesbal
24
Moose0528 24 points ago +24 / -0

The Left has succeeded in turning nearly every city in this nation into a third world shithole. There is no going back from this. These people can never be trusted to live in a civilized society. We can never forgive this, we must never forget this. They are literally bringing war to our streets, and when the time comes to fight we must eradicate this cancer from our country.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would all these whites supremacist Trump supporters start shooting at the police? Clearly this was done by Trump supporters to make the protestors look bad.

Imagine being so retarded that you go out and riot while thousands of your retarded comrades all livestream the evidence of your crimes.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know you think you have come across some kind of gotcha here that you refuse to let go of. For the conversation at hand it does not matter at all if he had a gun in his hand. All that matters for this conversation is that the officer could clearly see his target. Whether the guy should have been a target or not is immaterial here.

In the case at hand there is no doubt that there was a threat, what is being debated is whether the ENGAGEMENT of that threat was sound. In this case it absolutely wasn’t. The officer that has been charged disregarded every piece of training he had ever received and acted completely recklessly.

Just because your brain is not capable of following the conversation and making any kind of coherent argument doesn’t mean you are right.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well yeah, the actual law is what he is being charged with, wanton endangerment, let’s see what the definition of that is.

First-Degree Wanton Endangerment: “A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the first degree when, under circumstances manifesting extreme indifference to the value of human life, he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of death or serious physical injury to another person” (KRS 508.060). First-degree wanton endangerment is a Class D felony, punishable with fines of up to $10,000 and up to five years in prison. Second-Degree Wanton Endangerment: “A person is guilty of wanton endangerment in the second degree when he wantonly engages in conduct which creates a substantial danger of physical injury to another person” (KRS 508.070). Second-degree wanton endangerment is a Class A misdemeanor, punishable with fines of up to $500 and up to 12 months in county jail.

That is straight from the Kentucky State Code. His actions were idiotic, tactically unsound, and put numerous peoples’ lives in danger including his fellow officers and innocent neighbors. He has been rightfully charged and will probably be convicted.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yeah ok. You post two random videos that have absolutely nothing to do with the situation at hand, and you can’t form a coherent argument, but I can’t keep my story straight because I can’t tell if a guy has a gun in his hand from a video shot with a potato.

Get lost loser.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hold on, are you really trying to make the argument that this cop shot him because he was trying to climb out of his car to run away, and not because the cop thought he had a weapon in his hand? Are you then trying to use that to justify some Paul Blart motherfucker emptying his magazine into an apartment blindly? Jesus dude, you are even more retarded than I thought.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nobody is arguing that there was no threat. Nobody is arguing that the people shooting at the police should not have been killed. People are trying to explain to you that you don’t just randomly shoot into a building where you have no clear target.

It is literally one of the 4 rules of basic gun safety. “Be sure of your target and what is behind it.”

There is no way he was sure of his target, because he couldn’t see his target. There is no way he could be sure of what was behind his target because he couldn’t even see his target. That is why he fired 10 rounds and didn’t hit a fucking thing, and it’s also why he will never be able to own a firearm again.

GTFO with your mall ninja bullshit.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

What am I wrong about? The guys entire upper body is out of the car when he gets shot, is it not?

Please explain to me how this scenario is even remotely related to a cop shooting blindly into an apartment.

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +2 / -0

And right on cue the riots start to take the coverage off of the cesspool that is the Biden family.

If Trump Jr had an unpaid parking ticket it would be front page news for a week. Hunter Biden is knee deep in human trafficking and money laundering? Meh who cares?

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +2 / -0

We need every image of this truck possible. License plates, Uhaul truck #, anything we can get. Shouldn’t be hard to find out who rented the truck. My guess is they would start talking before their flight to Guantanamo even left the tarmac.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m not sure what you think your videos prove. In the first one a guy GETS OUT of car with a weapon and the cop shoots him. The cop can clearly see his target, he can identify a threat, and he can make a shot. In the second video a cop SEES a woman running down the street, in broad daylight, and the woman points a gun at him, so he runs her over. Both of these officers were able to identify the threat and eliminate it.

Nobody is even attempting to make the argument that police cannot use lethal force to eliminate a threat. What they are trying to say is that it is not acceptable to blindly shoot your gun into an apartment building. The officer in question here fired 10 rounds and HIT ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. That is why you don’t shoot if you can’t see your target.

This is really elementary stuff when it comes to training. I hope to God that you are some 12 year old kid talking shit on the internet and have zero access to firearms. If not then please go and sign up for some professional training IMMEDIATELY because your grasp on how to handle violent confrontations appears to only be shaped by your television.

1
Moose0528 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are fucking retarded and you have had exactly zero training.

What are you 12? You think police just shoot out the window at a drunk driver? They don’t put out spike strips, attempt pit maneuvers, or road blocks? Just start shooting as soon as he drives off? GTFO.

I will say it again, there is no training material ANYWHERE that will teach you to shoot blindly into an occupied dwelling.

Your argument is literally like saying “oh my god a sniper just shot at us, but we can’t see him and we don’t know where he is, so just shoot blindly into the night and hope you hit him.” It is flat out idiotic.

What if the people in the apartment next door got shot? What if a 3 year old kid is in the room that the cop is blindly shooting into? I mean hell, by your logic why not just throw a fucking grenade through the window? Or just do like they did in Waco and drive a tank through the wall?

When you say idiotic things I have no choice but to assume you are an idiot.

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +2 / -0

Dude this isn’t fucking Afghanistan. If you are a police officer, and someone is shooting at you from BEHIND COVER you fall back and change strategies, you don’t just blindly fire into a dwelling when you have no idea who or what is inside.

There is no training whatsoever that would teach you to do this. Period. The reason there is no training that would teach you to do this is because it is stupid and endangers potential innocents that you are unaware of. That’s why this officer was charged, and I’m perfectly fine with that.

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +2 / -0

They know they can’t stop Trump from nominating a Justice. They can’t stop the Senate from confirming without Republican defectors.

At this point they don’t have to “stop” Trumps pick. All they have to do is try and run out the clock. I would not put it past Sen Delecto to pretend he was willing to play ball only to defect at the last minute and force a scramble to get another nominee.

11
Moose0528 11 points ago +11 / -0

Time to hurry up and finish that wall on the Southern border so we can start building one around Seattle. Block them in, let them starve.

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +3 / -1

I hate to break it to you Cindy, but your husband wasn't just a loser, he was a terrorist supporting traitor that sent thousands of soldiers to their death so that his handlers could prosper. That being said go ahead and vote for Joe Biden, I'm sure Joe never said anything bad about your husband when John was running for President.

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +2 / -0

Looks like old Pierre is afraid someone might catch him with his hand in the cookie jar.

When they start to squirm over investigations, you should probably start looking into their dealings in Ukraine.

5
Moose0528 5 points ago +5 / -0

Let him bitch out and vote no. If he thinks the Dems riots are bad, let this election get decided for Biden by the SCOTUS and see what happens.

If he votes no he will be responsible for civil war.

3
Moose0528 3 points ago +3 / -0

I have said it on here before and I’ll say it again. You can’t possibly understand their actions if you haven’t read Rules For Radicals by Saul Alinsky.

Rule #4: Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.

This is why you hear them screeching about what happened with Garland in 2015. It is why you hear them screeching about invoking the nuclear option on Gorsuch. They are attempting to force Republicans to live up to “its own book of rules”.

Flip it on them. Make them live up to their own book of rules. Harry Reid invoked the nuclear option, and he was warned by none other than McConnell that he would regret it. Every single one of them railed about not voting on Obama’s nominee, even though Republicans had just flipped the Senate significantly in the midterm election.

They have no power to control this. Trump is the POTUS, they can’t stop him from nominating a Justice. Republicans have 52 votes in the Senate, they can’t stop them from voting to confirm. The only thing that can stop this is traitors and cowards in our own party.

Fuck their “book of rules”. The only book of rules that matters is the US Constitution. If Republicans don’t have the balls to wield power, just as we all know Dems would in this case, then it’s time to raze the Republican Party to the ground and start anew.

This fight could very well decide the election. They know this, all the Republicans in the Senate know this. Deferring their duty to vote on a nomination is throwing in the towel and asking for a 4-4 tie in the SCOTUS regarding mail in ballots. Refusal to ram this appointment right up the Dems asses is going to cause a Constitutional crisis when different appeals courts rule in different ways and the SCOTUS refuses to settle the score. John Roberts cannot be trusted, we must put a 5th vote on the SCOTUS by Election Day. Period. Full stop.

2
Moose0528 2 points ago +4 / -2

Yeah, GWB thought it was an “accident” all right.

5
Moose0528 5 points ago +5 / -0

We all know (R) Pierre Delecto from Utah will vote against whoever Trump nominated. Murkowski votes against Kavanaugh, so her vote is not guaranteed. If memory serves me correctly Collins from Maine was almost strong armed into voting against Kavanaugh. Those 3 alone would be enough to stop a confirmation, no?

It’s time to make our voices heard. Every Republican Senator needs to know that if they bitch out on this fight then they will never hold public office again. We especially need to target Senators who are up for election this November.

At this point if we don’t get a confirmation before the election, it could very well end up costing the election, or at least a majority in the Senate. I will never trust John Roberts to uphold the law, so we must have that 5th vote on our side.

If losing this fight costs us the Senate anyway, what’s the issue with threatening to vote out Republican Senators who refuse to confirm?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›