2
MothershipV 2 points ago +2 / -0

It was filed by the Missouri AG. Missouri+16 BRIEF OF STATE OF MISSOURI AND 16 OTHER STATES AS AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BILL OF COMPLAINT

1
MothershipV 1 point ago +2 / -1

Why cant we see the numbers here? We always complained that reddits numbers weren't accurate, so our solution here was to display no numbers?

1
MothershipV 1 point ago +1 / -0

I wonder if this is about the ballot shredding that happened yesterday?

3
MothershipV 3 points ago +3 / -0

He made a follow up video that addresses this.

4
MothershipV 4 points ago +4 / -0

You know it would be a great time to announce some big shit, while DC is having a huge Trump rally.

1
MothershipV 1 point ago +1 / -0

well either way its not negative votes

5
MothershipV 5 points ago +5 / -0

P and C ARE correlated in real life though, that's the point of his analysis.

1
MothershipV 1 point ago +1 / -0

The data point we are refering to indicates that 5% (X) of republican straight party voters voted for Trump, while 25% of single candidate voters voted for trump. 5-25 =-20 giving (X=5,Y=-20)

2
MothershipV 2 points ago +2 / -0

If 5% of the people that voted straight party ticket voted republican (a positive number of people), and 20% of the people that voted single candidate voted for Trump (a positive number of people), you would get 5%-20% = -15% difference. The -15% is not how many people voted, as that number is still positive, its just the difference in % of the 2 catagories.

1
MothershipV 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why though? Column C should be Trumps share of people that voted for him but didn't vote straight party. That's what Dr. Shiva used, and its not what you're using. You're letting your conclusion drive your data.

3
MothershipV 3 points ago +3 / -0

Guy is also claiming Trump got negative votes around 4 minutes, he clearly doesn't understand the graph he's looking at.

1
MothershipV 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why does your data in column C start with a higher % than column A, but end with a lower percent than column A? If they were the same value, or a constant ratio you would get a straight line. Edit, should say a constant difference, not ratio, since the % is already a ratio.

0
MothershipV 0 points ago +1 / -1

That's not true, the X axis is (# of people that voted straight party republican ticket option / total number of republicans and dems that voted straight party ticket option). The Y axis is (# of people that voted Trump but didnt vote straight party ticket option/ total # of people that didnt vote straight party ticket option) - X axis data. The Y and X axis are independent data sets (excluding the subtraction of the Xaxis data) , one does not include the other, one doesnt have to go down if the other goes up and vice versa.

0
MothershipV 0 points ago +1 / -1

The real world correlation says that as the X axis % increases, so will the Trump vote on the Y axis, thus negating it.

0
MothershipV 0 points ago +1 / -1

In the analysis Trumps share of total votes doesn't include the votes from republican only ballots, its just the % of people that didnt vote straight party but did vote Trump. the % that voted dem wont effect either column.

2
MothershipV 2 points ago +3 / -1

A negative slope is expected with random values, the point is the correlation between Republican straight party vote and Trump single vote is not random, you would expect it to be a fairly constant ratio, aka a straight line.

0
MothershipV 0 points ago +1 / -1

Your plot has 0-100% on the X axis, but only 0-10% on the Y axis. Also if you assume an equal % of Republican share and Trump share % then it would be a straight line at y = 0. Your data itself has a downward trend in that you start with 10% more Trump share on x = 0, and end with 5% less Trump share linearly at X = 1

view more: Next ›