0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

Ah yes - so now we’re back to your “argument” that publicly available mandatory reporting data is knowingly and deliberately wrong, and only “experts” like you who pay to get the numbers will have the correct data. Yep, that TOTALLY sounds like a real thing that happens. Totally.

As for learning - I’ve learnt so much from your expertise and insight, thank you 🤡

3
MsAnthropic 3 points ago +3 / -0

You’re welcome. You’re 100% right, when they pull this nonsense you need to lean all the way in. Sadly, most of them will be totally ok with it and not see your point.

1
MsAnthropic 1 point ago +1 / -0

They’ve done this many times already, it’s not “accidental”. They leave comments open increase engagement with the video which helps their stats, and of course delete the comments because everyone knows he cheated. It’s a deliberate strategy.

6
MsAnthropic 6 points ago +6 / -0

Yes, I think it’s a bot too - but there’s no way to tell, an NPC would respond the same way.

8
MsAnthropic 8 points ago +8 / -0

Perfect, I love it. The only thing I’d add is that you could have accused them of racism by only singling out black-owned businesses, tell them that they’re infantilising black people and that it smacks of colonialism. Tell them only doing it for black people is digital ghettoisation.

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

But you JUST SAID it’s “only reported twice a month”, so there can’t be different numbers two days apart! Plus if your numbers are right then it went UP not down in those two days.... and no, I didn’t post a “fake website”.... 🤦🏻‍♀️

2
MsAnthropic 2 points ago +2 / -0

I couldn’t care less what she looks like, I judge her solely on her dictatorial delusions.

3
MsAnthropic 3 points ago +3 / -0

“ethically non-monogamous open relationship”.... in other words then he’s literally a cuck. Imagine my shock.

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

Lol - it’s not 39%, you loser! I have it on EXPERT AUTHORITY that the correct number is 53%! Here’s the link to prove it: https://archive.is/vpnwV

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

There you go, that wasn’t so hard was it! You had the link all along, I don’t know why I had to ask you ten times to post it! 🤷🏻‍♀️

However, we still like the stonk. I didn’t buy it to make a profit.

1
MsAnthropic 1 point ago +1 / -0

By the way I love how you simultaneously claim a) the up-to-date statistic in question doesn’t exist because it’s only reported twice a month, and b) I can only see the up-to-date statistic if I’m an “expert” like you 🤡

NB: Just a tip for you, GME is listed on the NYSE not Nasdaq. Again, nice try though.

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never claimed to be an expert, only you did that.

Any time you have evidence to prove I’m wrong, go ahead and post your link. Just saying “I have the proof but I won’t show it to you” makes you look a bit pathetic.

1
MsAnthropic 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lol - you can make claims about what I supposedly know or don’t know all you like, you don’t know me. I actually do know about the reporting schedules, which is why I didn’t post links to the bimonthly reporting. Nice try though.

If you have EVIDENCE that proves I’m wrong, go ahead and post a link. Any time you’re ready.

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

I’ve posted multiple “real life sources” and linked to live data; you’ve posted zero sources. This is getting super boring - if you have evidence that proves I’m wrong please post a link. It’s pretty simple.

Plus you keep talking about the short interest, not sure why. I never made any claim about the interest rate and it’s not why most people bought the stonk.

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

I never made any claim about “short interest” so that’s irrelevant. Plus in any case you just repeatedly posted your opinion rather than linking to any source data like I did so it’s a fail on that count as well. If you have sources that prove me wrong then GO AHEAD AND POST A LINK.

I’ve posted multiple live links to sources that prove I’m not a “liar”, what I said was true - the stock is over 120% shorted. I’m sorry this fact upsets you.

0
MsAnthropic 0 points ago +1 / -1

Nope, you posted your opinion multiple times plus a claim that “professional investors” have access to secret true numbers that are different to the publicly posted numbers.....Just restating your opinion isn’t proof of anything. I forgot that you’re a dumbass and I needed to spell it out for you - if you’ve got EVIDENCE that proves me wrong, go ahead and post A LINK TO YOUR SOURCE.

1
MsAnthropic 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you’ve got evidence that proves me wrong, go ahead and post it.

3
MsAnthropic 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yes this is funny, but it’s also something we should PAY ATTENTION to - these people are organised.

4
MsAnthropic 4 points ago +4 / -0

Why are you equating people’s concerns over experimental vaccines with “anti-vaxxers”? Pretty big jump there, comrade

11
MsAnthropic 11 points ago +11 / -0

I would literally rather die of the Kung flu than get the vaccination, or even get tested. I’m not playing this stupid fucking game.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›