Fuck these guys.
Section 230 has been inconspicuously absent in recent months.
GOP threatens to repeal 230. Zuckerberg folds and says he won't censor. Everyone stops talking about it. A month later, Zuckerberg is like "jk I'm actually gonna censor"- but the rapid news cycle has DC focused on other things.
This is the perfect chance to bring 230 back into the discussion. Moderates have already started to wise up to the fact that big tech isn't just censoring conservatives, they're censoring anyone who criticizes the DNC/CCP.
What's ridiculous is that his backstory is the exact same as Elizabeth Warren's. He insists that his mother told him he was black, and that his birth certificate is a lie, and therefore it's true.
Maybe Trump should challenge him to do a DNA test and see if he's at least 1/1000 truthful.
My god, this is gold...
"Fauci also spoke at the festival in 2017, during which he criticized how fearful Americans were about pandemics.
“The American public, I guess understandably, has an issue with the concept of a new risk,” he said at the time. “You live with risks every day. [But] when a new risk comes in that’s far less risky than the risks that you’re living with, you get panicked about the new risk.”"
How the tables have turned.
Probably random European countries tbh. Looks like the ranks only show the top 3. Tim Pool did say that it’s ridiculous how big tech pretends to be against foreign election interference, yet half the users on /r/politics are just America-bashing Europeans or Australians.
"WTF I love Big Pharma now" -- The Left
It's just TDS on full display. As soon as Trump takes action to lower drug prices, the Left suddenly wants HIGHER drug prices. Why did they even bother voting for Bernie then?
I honestly think that DOJ holdovers are destroying evidence by the day- no, I know that for a fact. We all do. If Durham were to succeed, a lot of people would have to go to jail.
Recall that the original transcript of Flynn's interview with Comey's team is completely gone. Vanished. All that's left is Peter Stzrok's doctored version which even the original interviewers would say is misleading.
The mere fact that Barr was able to uncover the Flynn stuff was nothing short of a miracle. We basically learned from that one instance alone how much important evidence could have been destroyed.
Given all the holdovers in the DOJ, I wouldn't be surprised if Durham is being intentionally obstructed. Evidence is probably going into the shredder as we speak.
If you were part of the FBI that violated a hundred laws to get Hillary elected, why would you want Durham finding ANY relevant evidence at all? For all we know, he's being led to follow fake bread crumbs, and is frequently being told the documents he's looking for don't exist. They're probably making him jump through additional bureaucratic hurdles for every single document being requested.
Remember that the DOJ completely lost the original 302 transcript of Flynn's interview with Comey's team. They basically tried to throw Flynn in jail for a conversation in which the record was lost. All that is left is a heavily doctored version that Peter Stzrok worked on for 5 whole weeks, which the original interviewers don't even vouch for.
It's not even by county. Sometimes by city. And often, just parts of certain cities.
I live in Cupertino where Apple is headquartered. No blackouts. PG&E sent us notices but also exempted our neighborhoods. San Jose however, which borders our town, some of the poorer neighborhoods got 3-day blackouts.
I live in the rich town of Cupertino where Apple is headquartered. No blackouts at all.
However parts of San Jose the next-door city, where a lot of low income people live, there's been folks with 3-day blackouts. Their mayor, however, keeps insisting on TV that this has absolutely nothing to do with California's regressive energy policies...
Link to article in case anyone wants to poison their eyes with NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/congresswoman-blocked-touring-mail-facility-postal-service-police-n1239359
Even if it were the full quote they'd say it was "taken out of context". The media is just that dishonest.
When Project Veritas released their findings from Google trying to rig the election, the media said it was "taken out of context". But it was the full unedited conversation. The only possible way I can think of is if they said "just kidding" at the end, and that was spliced out.
Anytime someone on the left makes a blunder- "take out of context"
Anytime someone gets a soundbite from Trump- purposefully take it out of context.
Just another example of leftist projection.
This is where I'd downvote if I could...
-
Blacks are 13% of the population, not 2%.
-
The Democrats rely on having 90% of the black vote to ensure any possibility of winning the presidency. Trump's African American approval rating has been record-high for any modern Republican. 52% as of a couple days ago. If even just half that 52% vote for Trump, it's a guaranteed landslide.
Obama's legacy to the DNC... bringing African values into US elections.