1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Protest has always been ineffective. The whole concept was conceived and promoted by the Deep State to get dissidents to out themselves and waste their time/energy.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every time we link to Twitter, we shove more money down their throats.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Cue the “Well, of course I know him: he’s me,” Obi-wan meme.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

While this does sound like fun, claiming territory like this makes it easy for them to bomb you.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why the Hell would that help if they’re committing voter fraud? This treason goes beyond any party lines.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

. . . unless you consider those traitors to in fact be American-born CCP members.

5
MumblePeg 5 points ago +6 / -1

FBI would be better off without a leader, then . . . Or disbanded entirely.

3
MumblePeg 3 points ago +3 / -0

As far as I'm concerned, the power to mandate lockdowns never had any justifiable medical basis.

2
MumblePeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Nothing warms the heart like knowing that some of our kin in Europe are based and fighting the Good Fight.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Thanks for the explanation. If Trump headed the charge, I think it would succeed. Every other third party has been an ineffective laughing stock, though, so the next best option would be completely owning/controlling then thoroughly changing the Republican Party to not be full of traitorous cuckolds.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. It seems like broadband jamming over a wide geographic area is practically impossible, especially if the HAMs started to disregard their legal band allocations in a breakdown scenario.

Of course, when not in a complete national or statewide breakdown of law and order, any one or small group of operators would quickly be triangulated and jammed into oblivion between the FCC and the US military, if not summarily apprehended.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

So, let’s geek out a little bit for fun.

Honest question (because I don’t know): if I want to connect to the Internet—the World Wide Web—without having to rely on an ISP or commit a property crime, is there a way to do it? In other words, become an ISP myself? Then, are there further chokepoints (beyond the inconvenient but definitely surmountable DNS issue), and would the backhaul installation costs be at all feasible?

Satellites can have really bad connections when they don’t have good line of sight, and not only are they still ISPs (albeit potentially diversifying nations) but they are ISPs who have the (usually government) connections to launch satellites into orbit.

I don’t know enough about this subject (WWW topology), but it seems like there are serious chokepoints in its practical implementation that can easily be controlled, compared to HAM radio, where broadband jamming over a wide area is borderline impossible to do, especially in a serious breakdown scenario where HAMs stop limiting themselves to their allocated bands.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sure, everything you’re saying about the technology is true, but what about the ISPs? There are precious few of them; if they were to become compromised (like the media), how would the average person be able to connect?

10
MumblePeg 10 points ago +10 / -0

In all seriousness, though: it’s a lot easier for them to take away Internet access than for them to take HAM radio when things go sour.

7
MumblePeg 7 points ago +7 / -0

Serious question: what would it take to change the name, logo, and ‘animal’ of the GOP, converting it into the Lion Party?

2
MumblePeg 2 points ago +2 / -0

Agree 100%.

Doctors enjoy a position of respect in society not because of their educational achievements or high salaries, but because they are supposed to be servants to a higher calling. To that end, they take the ironically-named Hippocratic Oath.

Medical professionals (particularly doctors) have a DUTY to at least be in malicious compliance, red-pilling their patients one by one, if not in open revolt.

Their passive silence is doing great harm.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Maybe this Diedra, the one Trump supporter, would be willing to talk.

10
MumblePeg 10 points ago +10 / -0

Is this the one that simultaneously looks like both a prostitute and the trucker who killed her?

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

The quickest way to being just as irrelevant as the Libertarian, Green, and every other ‘third’ Party.

Let’s take a hint from the President, the Pauls: change the GOP from elephants into lions.

by NeOmega
1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

Doc, do you have any links for further straight/honest reading on vaccines? I want to make educated decisions for our little ‘pede, but the info from mainstream sources is so obviously couched in careful wording for the sake of public health that it seems unreliable.

I hear about Gates’ vaccines hurting people around the world (India, in particular); I know that one infant vaccine caused my little brother to have his first and only seizure; and many vaccines make me feel like junk for a few days afterward; so it seems obvious that they aren’t necessarily “safe”. But I also know that many of them are for viruses that are truly terrifying, so they also represent humanity’s triumph.

1
MumblePeg 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know: why don’t we make murder illegal??

14
MumblePeg 14 points ago +15 / -1

Even if that were the case, it in no way absolves the hordes of useful idiots who enable them.

view more: Next ›