Libertarianism doesn’t mean no laws/regulations, it means non-aggression. Libertarianism is compatible with private cities with borders, pro-worker ideas, anti-commie laws. The main thing is that the laws are voluntarily imposed. By joining the private city you sign a contract consenting to the laws.
It’s a statist meme. It presumes that libertarians think “free markets” are fine, by “free markets” the meme means crony capitalism. It assumes that the only way to reign in big tech is using government force, because “free markets” aren’t enough. It’s a government bootlicking meme. Anyway, carry on laughing at libertarians, most of them aren’t real libertarians anyway.
Newsflash. They aren’t libertarians. They are statist shills.
Nice Strawman you cuck.
(1) government literally created big tech monopoly. If you think we these companies would flourish with unfettered capitalism, you need to go learn some economics.
(2) if you don’t like monopolies, why do think the only solution to monopolies is to literally create the biggest monopoly of all...like government monopolies over law and enforcement?
(3) libertarianism isn’t no laws/regulations, it’s non-aggression. If you want to create your private city that has border walls / tech regulations / other shit, libertarianism is compatible with people freely organizing anti-commie/pro-worker cities. It even allows you to have people sign contracts to join your private city, including free helicopter rides for commies.
If you still think this somehow debooonks libertarianism, have at it statist cuck.
Nice strawman statist cuck.
It’s compatible with libertarianism to deny that private ownership rights are so strong that you could freely acquire a monopoly. Read Lockes Proviso.
if you don’t like monopolies, why do think the only solution to monopolies is to literally create the biggest monopoly of all...like government monopolies over law and enforcement?