29
MushBrains2020 29 points ago +31 / -2

Just finished watching, here are the key points (this whole interrogation should've been 10 minutes instead of 2 hours):

  • He does recant his statement that he heard them talking about backdating ballots
  • He says he only overheard them talking about dates and he assumed they were backdating them
  • He still stands by the fact that they were told to collect ballots on the 5th and 6th and separate them. Late ballots are supposed to be separated by law so this isn't a big deal, but we don't know if it's the USPS who is supposed to enforce that law. It could be an indication that they wanted to manipulate those ballots, it could also just be standard policy.
  • He wrote 11/05/2020 on the only ballot he picked up that day because he was afraid they might try to backdate and count it. This lends some credibility to his "assumption" I mentioned earlier, memory gets foggy over time (and foggier while being interrogated) but something made him afraid of backdating on that day. An opposing lawyer would probably say he came into the situation paranoid and was simply projecting his own fears onto their conversation.

The ONLY noteworthy thing he still stands by is the fact that his supervisor (Stephanie) told them on Nov. 5th to keep collecting ballots because "Every vote counts". In PA, votes must be received by the board of elections by 8 p.m. on election day, they are not valid simply because they're postmarked before 8pm on that day. Any ballot collected on (or after) the 4th would automatically be invalid. Here is the law if you want to check that: https://www.legis.state.pa.us/cfdocs/Legis/LI/uconsCheck.cfm?txtType=HTM&yr=2019&sessInd=0&smthLwInd=0&act=77

In the end I think his testimony is pretty worthless now, at best it just raises the same questions we were already asking. We don't need a witness to know that the USPS was still collecting ballots after Nov. 3rd. What we need to know is exactly what happened to those ballots after they collected them.

12
MushBrains2020 12 points ago +13 / -1

Looks legit, her affidavit is shown around the 18 minute mark in the Twitch video. That's also where she talks about witnessing poll workers forge voter signatures "all day and all night" without anyone monitoring. "Not one time in a 24 hour shift did I see a single ballot for Trump", she estimates they forged thousands of signatures.

-5
MushBrains2020 -5 points ago +5 / -10

Rudy doesn't blow smoke.

That was literally all he did with the laptop.

3
MushBrains2020 3 points ago +8 / -5

not only will Biden NOT be elected as the AP claimed, but chances are GREAT @realDonaldTrump will be confirmed as President again.

Um... isn't that saying the same thing twice since one implies the other?

Who the fuck is writing these tweets, a 5th-grader?

0
MushBrains2020 0 points ago +4 / -4

Really undermining the whole effort with this clickbait bullshit.

5
MushBrains2020 5 points ago +8 / -3

1.) Unconfirmed and seems to be based on a TV news ticker, which is pretty sketchy evidence.

2.) Headline is pretty clickbaity, they admit Biden would still be in the lead if this is confirmed:

When this adjustment is confirmed Biden will only hold a 1,508 vote lead

-2
MushBrains2020 -2 points ago +1 / -3

WE NEED THIS WITH LINKS TO REDPILL THE MASSES.

Edit: No mention of sworn affidavits in PA and NV

6
MushBrains2020 6 points ago +8 / -2

Why do people always ruin the credibility of these videos by adding a bunch of cheesy Halloween music and shit?

The words alone should be enough, don't fuck it up.

2
MushBrains2020 2 points ago +5 / -3

No one is trying to undue

Sounds legit.

2
MushBrains2020 2 points ago +3 / -1

The weed vote probably brought out a bunch of morons who blindly voted for Biden because their friends said orange man bad

6
MushBrains2020 6 points ago +7 / -1

330 million US population - 200 million dead from COVID - 150 million dead from gun violence = -20 million.

Yup, the math checks out. All that's left are 20 million undead roaming the US.

44
MushBrains2020 44 points ago +45 / -1

Nah man it was 210 million just a little while ago: https://nypost.com/2020/10/05/biden-stumbles-by-claiming-210-million-died-from-coronavirus/

If you add that to the 150 million who died from gun violence the whole country is dead!

GUYS WE'RE FUCKING DEAD AND WE DON'T EVEN KNOW IT

0
MushBrains2020 0 points ago +1 / -1

> Claims he's running on Hope, not Fear

> Drives around the country trying to scare people with death statistics

Once a liar, always a liar.

1
MushBrains2020 1 point ago +2 / -1

It's designed to mislead readers into conflating the two Hunter Biden stories. [Hunter Typhoon Doc] = [Hunter laptop] is what they want readers to conclude. They even nudge people in that direction:

One month before a purported leak of files from Hunter Biden's laptop, a fake "intelligence" document about him went viral on the right-wing internet

it helped lay the groundwork among right-wing media for what would become a failed October surprise: a viral pile-on of conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden.

fake persona laid the groundwork for a Hunter Biden conspiracy deluge

Uhhh... no, nobody gave a shit about this fake persona or their fake document.

Also ironic that they call it a "failed October surprise" since the same authors released an alarmist article on Oct. 22 saying Hunter Biden conspiracies were sweeping the internet and getting millions of shares.

Their fake persona, on the other hand, went nowhere:

The report itself was shared across Facebook and Twitter around 5,000 times, according to BuzzSumo, and more than 80 sites linked back to the blog, which was shared more than 25,000 times on Facebook and Twitter.

Wow, 30k shares? That's almost .001% of the population!

23
MushBrains2020 23 points ago +24 / -1

I'm sure it's pure coincidence that NBC "debunked" a completely unrelated Hunter Biden story 3 hours after Glenn Greenwald dropped his bombshell Biden article (and resignation).

7
MushBrains2020 7 points ago +8 / -1

THEY DON'T EVEN DEBUNK THE FUCKING DOCUMENT! They wrote an entire story about a "fake" document that nobody has ever heard of and instead of focusing on the authenticity of the document itself they analyze the avatar of the blogger who posted it.

Liberals are eating this garbage up.

18
MushBrains2020 18 points ago +19 / -1

I just saw a Twitter thread where someone replied with a link to James O'keefe's newest video but instead of displaying the tweet it said "This tweet is currently unavailable."

If you go directly to O'keefe's twitter feed you can see it's still there, same exact link that was posted in the reply but censored for no reason.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›