I bet you're finding lots of interesting information in your research.
"MSNBC host Al Sharpton last month threatened to accuse Manchin and Sinema of "supporting racism" over their support of the filibuster.
The pressure that we are going to put on Sinema and Manchin is calling [the filibuster] racist and saying that they are, in effect, supporting racism," Sharpton told Politico. "Why would they be wedded to something that has those results? Their voters need to know that."
Didn't some of the original outrage occur because people were being in the institutions were being mistreated?
In 1967, the California legislature passed the Lanterman-Petris-Short Act (LPS), which allowed local, private (i.e., non-state) mental facilities to accept more patients—particularly those with more treatable or milder forms of mental illness.
Governor Reagan signed the bill into law; in his view, this was a win-win: mental health patients would receive treatments, and in turn the funding to state mental facilities could be reduced. Of course, the state facilities cried foul at the cut in funding, even though in theory they were not being under-funded. Of course, with a lower case load, treatments improved; however, some facilities reduced headcount.
Despite the bipartisan plan, unforeseen consequences developed. Without a requirement that all mental health patients go to public facilities, many borderline individuals simply refused private treatment as was their right. The upshot was that many individuals who could have benefited from treatment simply did not get any at all; they wound up as functioning members of the public. And sometimes, problems occurred.
Later, the Carter administration signed into law the Mental Health Systems Act of 1980, which largely promoted the same idea for national facilities. In 1981, when both parties in Congress agreed to the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, President Reagan signed that into law. One of it many provisions was to eliminate federal funding for community services and thereby transfer funding back to individual funding or state-funded efforts. Had Reagan even been aware of that part of the Act, he would have immediately realized the Act was negating the disastrous effects of the LPS he experienced as governor of California.
In other words, the State needs more funding control over mental health facilities, whether local, community, or state. Serious cases could still be funded through Medicaid, creating a virtual federal funding pool of money. This was formalized in the Mental Health Planning Act of 1986.
In effect, bipartisan policies recommended that the Federal government transfer government funding of community mental health facilities back to the states. State-funded facilities as well as privately-funded facilities were not affected by that policy. Reagan signed the bill into law as part of an overall spending cut package. As he would have known, complete state funding of facilities resulted in terrible mental healthcare, but state governments had an obligation to provide for this. However, in 1986, he also signed into a law another bipartisan solution to have Medicaid assist with funding. The laws closed not a single facility.
"Although Rothschild was a major fund raiser for Hillary Clinton's 2008 presidential bid, she transferred her support to Republican candidate John McCain when Barack Obama beat Clinton, becoming a minor celebrity on cable television at the time for attacking Obama in a series of interviews."
Of course she supported McCain the snake.
"Seeks funding from the US to expand the program to Honduras and Guatemala"
As if they don't already receive enough money from us. Another money laundering scheme.
Yes, tress are racist because of lynching.
Here are bible names for girls. I like the name Anna.
She has to go back.
It's for 2022.
This is true. A real main-in ballot could have many different sets of prints, whereas fake ones would probably have less.
Yep, it's Jovan Pulitzer and his team.
That's exactly what he says in the video!
The whole process is going to take six weeks.
They're checking for creases, the type of paper used, whether it was filled out with ink or by machine...
Yes, yes he is.
Even if they put in creases, they would still have to have an envelope with a matching signature.
The guy leading it is legit.
It's going to take six weeks.
This whole process is going to take six weeks. We don't know anything before then.
They're not counting anything. They're doing a forensic audit of the ballots to see which ones are fraudulent.
Livestream of all cameras
Almonds activated.
Jovan Pulitzer is leading the whole thing, so yes, we can trust them.
The Kochs are big donors to The Federalist Society.