10
NadlersPants 10 points ago +10 / -0

The FBI is a large organization. Its leadership is mostly the same kind of people as Democrat leadership. Extremely power-minded, career minded yes-men. These guys won’t do the right thing, they’ll just do what the guy ahead of them says to do, at all costs even if he’s corrupt. Because fundamentally, they are too.

The rank and file is mostly lazy and apathetic people feeding the egos of the leadership. Like other government employees. They don’t really care about doing a good job, mostly just care about doing the minimum necessary to fulfil their job duties and get retirement benefits.

But you can find based people at the FBI too. It is not just homogeneous blue side faggots. Usually these are the people actually doing the work at the FBI. Seriously, almost all the real work is done by a few guys.

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol.

“Bubba here ain’t gay. But he’s got a hard on and you’re the only pussy around.”

4
NadlersPants 4 points ago +4 / -0

FBI actually has overseas branches. A lot of the data they deal with is actually considered more secret than the data the military uses.

No idea why, but FBI data is locked down harder than military intelligence. You’d think it would be the opposite.

11
NadlersPants 11 points ago +11 / -0

Correct. Utah data center has exabytes of data, mostly audio.

I’m a software engineer, one of the architects I used to work with was one of the architects there too. He talked about it from time to time.

6
NadlersPants 6 points ago +6 / -0

Hello there fellow caterpillar! I am Jerry Nadler... err maymay peruser NadlersPants! Say, did you see the one about the democrats? That was a good one.

Anyway, I too partake of Fox News every day, the number one source for news. Tune in this weekend to see the scoop!

2
NadlersPants 2 points ago +2 / -0

Hundreds of thousands.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

You have my Corsair K95 RGB Platinum XT, Mr. President.

43
NadlersPants 43 points ago +43 / -0

It is not sufficient, but very supportive. If you get a statistician to testify, it would hold as expert testimony.

3
NadlersPants 3 points ago +3 / -0

If it’s the video I think, it’s a former presidential advisor talking about DHS and using blockchain technology and radioactive tracers to tag original ballot paper. The paper was then sent to the states where they printed their ballots.

If it’s true, DHS should be able to examine the papers, easily determine which ones were legit, and via the blockchain figure out who was printing forged ballots.

My first instinct was it’s far fetched, but there’s been a lot of stuff proven lately that was more far fetched, so who knows right now?

13
NadlersPants 13 points ago +13 / -0

They did it in 2018 and nobody did a thing. A dozen+ house seats flipped red to blue at the last minute, with a number of districts reporting 100+ percent participation. It was obvious then and obvious now.

5
NadlersPants 5 points ago +5 / -0

We saw this in the 2018 election too. I remember sitting there and watching 20 some house seats turn from red to blue after final ballots come in. Some of those were similar, with 100% blue batches coming in at the last second.

I think only a couple republicans even contested.

1
NadlersPants 1 point ago +1 / -0

Lies always catch up to you.

The truth on the other hand, is always best in the long term.

This is a hard lesson for the dems to swallow, seeing as how everything they’ve done this cycle is based on lies and they keep digging in deeper.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›