2
Nancys_drooping_eye 2 points ago +2 / -0

'Does this have to do with the way the vax response is mounting a broader inflammatory response, possibly moreso because of the lipid nanoparticle or mRNA mechanism? Either way I am fascinated! Inflammation + tissue remodeling = extra bleedypants!'

Holy shit lady! This thing is fucking with your biology and you're being cute about it.

3
Nancys_drooping_eye 3 points ago +3 / -0

"You have many slaves, Xerxes, but few warriors. It won't be long before they fear my spears more than your whips."

16
Nancys_drooping_eye 16 points ago +16 / -0

Anytime I refer to him I just call him "the senile pedophile". I refuse to call him anything but what he is.

4
Nancys_drooping_eye 4 points ago +4 / -0

I wish I could take credit but I just stole it.

4
Nancys_drooping_eye 4 points ago +4 / -0

"The Happiest Days of Our Lives" most commonly followed up with "Another Brick in the Wall Pt. 2"

1
Nancys_drooping_eye 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting diet of Venus flytraps and pitcher plants.

9
Nancys_drooping_eye 9 points ago +9 / -0

I heard he was a child rapist and the more he denies it the more it proves that he rapes children.

1
Nancys_drooping_eye 1 point ago +1 / -0

These people can't see past the worthless processes and procedures that has led us to this. We need a great reset, just not the kind that those globalist faggots want.

1
Nancys_drooping_eye 1 point ago +1 / -0

A rotten gonorrhea infected cunt.

3
Nancys_drooping_eye 3 points ago +4 / -1

Nobody wants to be the "psychopath" lone wolf.

8
Nancys_drooping_eye 8 points ago +8 / -0

It’s been like this since the invention of television.

My dude

The New York Journal and New York World, owned respectively by William Randolph Hearst and Joseph Pulitzer, gave Maine intense press coverage, employing tactics that would later be labeled "yellow journalism." Both papers exaggerated and distorted any information they could obtain, sometimes even fabricating news when none that fitted their agenda was available. For a week following the sinking, the Journal devoted a daily average of eight and a half pages of news, editorials and pictures to the event. Its editors sent a full team of reporters and artists to Havana, including Frederic Remington,[57] and Hearst announced a reward of $50,000 "for the conviction of the criminals who sent 258 American sailors to their deaths."[58] The World, while overall not as lurid or shrill in tone as the Journal, nevertheless indulged in similar theatrics, insisting continually that Maine had been bombed or mined. Privately, Pulitzer believed that "nobody outside a lunatic asylum" really believed that Spain sanctioned Maine's destruction. Nevertheless, this did not stop the World from insisting that the only "atonement" Spain could offer the U.S. for the loss of ship and life, was the granting of complete Cuban independence. Nor did it stop the paper from accusing Spain of "treachery, willingness, or laxness" for failing to ensure the safety of Havana Harbor.[59] The American public, already agitated over reported Spanish atrocities in Cuba, was driven to increased hysteria.[60] William Randolph Hearst's reporting on Maine whipped up support for military action against the Spanish in Cuba regardless of their actual involvement in the sinking. He frequently cited various naval officers saying that the explosion could not have been an on-board accident. He quoted an "officer high in authority" as saying "The idea that the catastrophe resulted from an internal accident is preposterous. In the first place, such a thing has never occurred before that I have ever heard of either in the British navy or ours."[61] Hearst's sources never had to be specifically named because he just needed them to support the narrative that the explosion was caused by an attack by the Spanish.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Maine_(1889)

2
Nancys_drooping_eye 2 points ago +2 / -0

Critical thinking is a dangerous trait to have these days.

view more: Next ›