Who did this? I’d love to have their contact information to forward it to the team.
But yes, just to be clear, I am solely focused on 2 ballot machine companies (well they’re basically one) software, but I can say some of the findings are wrong, as far as focusing on urban strongholds.
We have found the same source code implemented on EVERY machine. Other than that, his math is statistically flawless. He is correct on the urban stronghold idea in a different way which I will get to.
To make this extremely simple so that it doesn’t take 20 paragraphs to dictate, these machines themselves are benign, however, the servers are where the data manipulation resides, and I can confirm we have a mirror of the domestic server.
What basically occurred was, without getting into fractional voting, is for every batch, which commonly are 50 votes, Biden would receive 2.6% more than Trump, if you were to run 25 ballots for Trump and 25 for Biden, thus for every batch Biden would receive 26.3, Trump would get 23.7. If you change these states votes by 2.6% overall, most states Trump would win.
Now, when this did not work in these states to out perform Trump, and this is outside my scope of what I’m doing but I am in the loop, there were “dumps” of ballots put on top.
These dumps are being forensically analyzed of origin (thus far I have heard the Middle East to actually be the source of most, Kazakhstan and Iran being the big two, that does not mean the operators actually were in the Middle East also) but as this author described, absolutely impossible statistically to occur.
This is why for instance, if you look back at the “glitches,” for instance the 6000 in Michigan, the server simply dropped these ballots into the wrong county. We may have proof of this. I’m not saying that to be “wink wink,” we have a company working on retrieving these servers data as they were scrubbed, but we can already prove statistically and also comparing votes to voter turn out it’s completely bogus.
It’s not even just patience, but people need to stop going all in on every step or happening and when it fails it’s civil war, and Trump’s out of options. I’m not saying it won’t and shouldn’t result in that if things go sideways, but the case had a number of flaws that Trump’s own case doesn’t, and Trump has a very well outlined plan that needs everyone to be all in on versus fireworks in between.
I don’t think he ever said the Texas suing was the planned “big one,” but it had promise, certainly. If you have half the country on paper suing on your behalf, that’s pretty big. It never meant that was his only play and if it failed were done for.
When did anyone say up until a few days ago that Texas was going to sue 4 states? Never. You need to stop listening to people who go “THIS IS IT” and get your hopes up. The plan always was:
A. Sue at local county levels, investigate fraud and gather witnesses
B. Cases get thrown out at local levels, but make a media show out of it, and gather evidence and affidavits from witnesses
C. Cases go to top state courts, IE circuit and state Supreme Court
D. If cases fail at the top state level, add to federal Supreme Court case
E. If Supreme Court fails, execute executive order 13848.
Texas was never in the plan. It helps, a lot. But it wasn’t planned.
And Trump’s significant, personal case has merit. There is one other that is looked at as being a possible option as well (regarding mail in ballots in of itself being unconstitutional). But when Trump hits SCOTUS personally, especially if he has the Dominion/Smartmatic evidence, it’s could really change history forever.
We cannot let the toppings sour the dessert. The TX case was a topping to what’s in store. We really must hope the appearance of impropriety doesn’t override basic morals, as both justices are aware they will be with 60 other justices, I’d like to believe they will rightfully deliver the correct result.
I think right now the problem is there’s a lot of misinformation, pedes hope entirely placed into singular things. A war is not won from one battle, even 60. The problem is these are highly technical things either legal or actual tech, and this stuff is easily manipulated to make you believe to then be crushed when it doesn’t work.
When the SCOTUS and EO bullets have been expended from the chamber, the “fourth box” should be opened.
This outcome has been the one everyone in top ranks has thought would happen way before Nov. 3rd (well, fourth and on), and has been planned out accordingly.
I would, the only thing is we are not done completely on the most pivotal part, which is when the judge stepped in. We are still working because we have the data. When it’s completed I absolutely will even under any legal issue.
Hypothetically I can say though, and I have to be purposefully base here, say you had a voting machine that you were able to reverse engineer to get its source code, and were able to replicate the machine on a local network and internet connected network, I cannot say the methodology exactly, but say you put 50 Trump marked ballots in, and 50 Biden marked ballots in, and a server churns out a Biden win with a statistical significance to several other states (say maybe in the range of 2%?).
Take great note on the “glitches” (the 6000 vote “oopsie”).
I can say this because it’s vague enough to also shed some light, there’s a reason recounts, auditing, etc, really find nothing.
Literally, if you’ve seen the office the movie, and remember the “penny scheme”? Our friends maybe took the movie too literally. And flash drives I guess were on sale on Nov. 2nd.
If what I heard is true, wait till you hear who wrote it haha. Also, it is basically impossible for Biden to rescind. That is why he’s said he wants to get rid of all Trump’s EO’s. EO 13848 is the last bullet in the chamber of freedom.
Haha well yeah, but just was so odd they used that explanation to say why she didn’t remember it for 40(? We still don’t know lol!) years. Because I know from family members being psychiatrists you can implant memories just as easily as “remember” them.
I was just thinking too, I’d love to know right now how many people still believe her. Probably at a high because SCOTUS is being activated, but I doubt even it hits 50% demonrats.
Yeah, I mean she just 100% came off like some psycho who needed a payday. The whole thing about her psychologist though was very off, how she didn’t have this memory until the psychologist “recovered it”. You can implant thoughts into peoples minds very easily.
Looking at insignificant samples will result in insignificant fraud.
Also, the source of the sampling is an issue. I guarantee you these ballots were from rural areas that have not seen much of any fraud. You get to urban areas I guarantee the fraud would be pretty high.
Also, 1% fraud historically is like, shocking, 0.55% on such a small sample is still quite bad.
What was trump down by in Arizona? Because at even 0.55% that would be 17,600 ballots.
But 1000 out of 3.2m votes, you’re talking 0.003%. That’s worthless, it’s not a large enough sample to garner any useful data either way. At least 30,000 ballots would need to be looked at for a meaningful audit.
He did not lose in PA, they didn’t grant an emergency injunction which is a hard thing to get. Last time at that level it was granted was a family with a family member on life support, on opposing sides of pulling the plug.
Thank you. I’m just trying to help ground everyone who put WAY too many eggs in the Texas lawsuit basket. It was an amazing thing to see almost half the country back Trump, and it seems to a legal layman (like me) that all is lost if THAT doesn’t work, but it did HELP. The plan thats in place is still in place, and the two things to look at are the Trump lawsuits and the EO. The EO does not work exactly how most think and if we have to go there it will not, not, not, be good.