2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, I am no lawyer, but I do know a bit about SCOTUS cases, I do know if LA and TX filed similar lawsuits the SC will almost certainly combine the cases, basically effectively making the two “joined”. If other states have filed, they also will most likely all be joined as well together.

4
Nekroziz 4 points ago +4 / -0

If you’re in Florida, Ohio, Alabama, Mississippi, Idaho, Kansas, N/S Dakota, any red states, ASK TO JOIN TEXAS AND LOUISIANA IN SUIT!

2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

That’s great I will get those organized on my post, WE MUST FIGHT FOR TRUMP.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’m going to write up a post here on who we need to write to and things we can do. We can’t sit on our thumbs and hope and pray.

by timer
3
Nekroziz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Stop even WATCHING Tim Pool. He’s a Joe Rogan impersonator who grifts whichever side he can make the most money off. He’s irrelevant.

5
Nekroziz 5 points ago +5 / -0

Mail in voting in of its self violates the federal constitution

17
Nekroziz 17 points ago +17 / -0

Just so you guys know, SCOTUS most likely will combine multiple cases into one. This will be monumental. Look into Bush v. Gore, and we also have a solid majority with or without Cuck Roberts. It was also 6-3 for Bush, on paper we should be 6-3 but I see 5-4.

Also, Bush lost every case before SCOTUS

2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would respond, “So you are telling me, the same people who participated in the corruption will rule for the Trump campaign? And in an election with millions of unsolicited ballots being sent everywhere, recognized out of state, voted multiple times, or even dead, that there is not more than 10,000 votes per state to overturn the election, even putting aside the obvious fraud that has been documented by video and proven by witness affidavits, testimony, Dominion’s machines being tested to skew Biden if fed an even number of votes, and mathematician’s testimony. If you truly answer yes to that, you will not receive my vote ever again.

2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

When you don’t want to be hung for treason

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, maybe a reenactment of what happened to Dan Cuckshaw? Skull fucking till your eye pops out from isis?

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or if you voted 300 times, are dead, don’t even exist, or are code like the Office’s penny scheme but for Sleepy Creepy Joe Pedophile.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Or just military tribunal hang them but that’s my fever dream, haha.

2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well that’s the key I think is Trump really campaigning for key senators and representatives for 2022, and McCain’ing the RINO’s. It just seems a little insurmountable atm from how many RINO’s have popped their ugly heads up from thinking “Trump is weak right now, it’s our shot!”

I know for a fact Van Drew remaining in NJ being like 1 of 2 republicans in the entire states political system is from his huge Trump endorsement, every single person I know whose in NJ who voted Trump made it a point to mention Van Drew.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I highly highly doubt he does anymore when he’s going around attacking his lawyers, the 2A, destroying Trump’s isolationist/nationalistic immigration reforms, and prostituting himself as the Republican who says there’s no election fraud.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well I would take your opinion over mine as I was really on the sidelines and would never call myself a veteran or dealt with the “actual” military. I will say superiors- especially subcontractors were about as evil as it gets. One made a statement to the effect after we were talking about elections and I believe it was Obama/Romney, “it doesn’t matter who you pick, the U.N. will always be our superiors, one just will get us to our intended destination quicker”. And that rattled enough of us that I transferred into the FAA shortly after.

And I did hear something similar regarding Russia and China, “we need boots on the ground in every country with mil-tech cyber units,” funnily enough I never did anything regarding Islamic terrorists, although it was always front facing to be about Islamic terrorists. And with two sub contractors specifically, it was very apparent “we make a ‘stronger’ bond with the U.N we can become a united superpower”.

Immigration to me has never been brought up, but I do think really it comes down to democrats know more immigration equals more votes and also money in their pockets probably from deals made with countries to allow mass immigration. And really boils down to more immigration the less America is different from Europe or or whomever that globalization can make a stronger footing from its optics.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the media did a good job suppressing Trump, he wouldn't have won in 2016 and surely not in 2020. You have half the US listening to Trump directly. I just don't see with the level of corruption and cowards the RNC houses "another Trump" ever happening again, without such significant change to Trump's ideals and morals.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not saying I disagree with you, but I've been around since 2015 on the Trump train, 2020 wasn't even close, but 2016 during republican primaries had a VERY sizeable "never trumper" Cuck Shapiro-esque conservative movement. I think most went "HRC or Trump? I'm going Trump." But they were not happy about it.

And of course conservatives were what got him the win in 2020, I would never even come close to saying otherwise, but as far as his GAINS, they were outside republicans when it came from 2016 to 2020.

And I think at this point it really boils down to, Trump has formed his own base. He doesn't need the RNC. If Trump ran in 2016 without the RNC, he may have got 3% of the vote. But now? People's distrust into the RNC is at an all time high, democrats have been split for 4 years, and Trump could easily have his own party that could be viable going further. I don't see republicans ever winning again in the next 50 years from how bad they've dropped the ball, and people see that.

2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

I am college educated and was in the "military" (computer systems programming for the air force), and I wouldn't say even close to 50%. Programming side it was easily 70/30 nationalist/globalist, and the globalists weren't like, very intelligent nor stuck to their beliefs as much as we did on our side.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, I'd wager a guess mid December however. Most OFFICIAL TRUMP lawsuits are going to be known of which way they're going. And Dec. 8th is a very pivotal hearing on an independent lawsuit regarding mail-in voting even being permissible in PA.

There is the chance Trump goes the army redo the election through presidential powers however as a plan B.

1
Nekroziz 1 point ago +1 / -0

In favor of endless war

In favor of restricting the 2A (red flag laws)

A part of a Soros organization

In favor of mass immigration

Says there’s no election fraud

Basically look up his promises to Texan’s and how many of them he kept, and his voter record.

2
Nekroziz 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe he’ll take a spoon to his other eye so he can ensure he can’t see any election fraud

3
Nekroziz 3 points ago +3 / -0

Dave switched sides when our side was at its hottest viewership wise. Look at the #’s right wing media was doing when he switched. Then as soon as a crack shows he’s back to centrist fence sitting to wait for which side wins to jump onto.

Shapiro is a total cuck, not so much a grifter, his views are very apparent, just he will sugar coat them about Trump when it’s good for him and down play his views about Trump when it’s not. He’s a Never Trumper that obfuscates that fact when it’s good financially for him.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›