The purpose of Reality News would be to cover the actual news, but as if Trump were still in office. 100% willful negative bias/twist toward the administration.

I'm seeing people doing this already with stuff posted to Twatter like "6000 deaths from COVID-19 mismanagement since taking office" but we need to go further.

Take every fawning news article and twist it negative just like they did to Trump.

To begin with maybe just headlines but move into full-on brief articles.

To peacefully do the most you can through the next week anyway, I humbly suggest pressuring the State legislatures in AZ, GA, PA, MI, and WI (also NV if you have the time). Call them if you can; it's 1000x more effective than email. These State legislators have a lot of egg on their faces and they know it. Tell them you're a resident even if you aren't. Tell them you are embarrassed and feel the legislatures failed their Constitutional duty and it is their utmost priority and responsibility to restore faith in the electoral process. Demand a full forensic audit, and also complete review of the systems used.

Say you are especially gravely concerned with the electronic voting systems. All of the above States use Dominion at least in part, but do not say Dominion at all. Instead of using Dominion itself as the bogeyman (which undermines your case), demand their audits include the following specific points and use the language suggested below because it's based in Federal law. These questions are crucial and specifically designed to be leading questions:

• What is the error rate? Must be <1:125000
• What was the rate of adjudicated ballots? Same threshold as above. Use Antrim and NV audit results (68 and 70% respectively) as basis for your grave concerns here.
• Does the system allow "ranked choice voting" (weighting candidates) and was it enabled? (Dominion allows this, it was enabled in Antrim, MI, but again don't mention Dominion specifically).
• Can ballots be adjudicated only individually, or in batches? If the latter, how can this system be trusted for ANY election? (Dominion allows batch adjudication)
• Is there an audit trail for EVERY adjudicated ballot, that specifically shows who adjudicated it AND retains the original ballot image for comparison? (Dominion does not have an audit trail. Random admin user can do whatever the fuck they want, in huge batches, and their name is not recorded - just that an admin was there. Reportedly after adjudication the original ballot images are discarded in Dominion).

State that these questions simply must be answered and guaranteed to be true for whatever system is in place moving forward. Emphasize their Constitutional responsibility and thank them for their time.

Make your own script based on the above, and start calling. You should be able to get it down to a few minutes once practiced.

Dominion fails all of these counts, hard, but if you lay out the leading questions as above you make a far more compelling argument than complaining about Dominion in particular - and Dominion is NOT ALONE among similar electronic voting systems in having serious flaws!

BLM acknowledges publicly they have no staff, no infrastructure, they don't create programs to better anyone. And yet they are accepting literally millions in donations from all sorts of organizations.

Some of these organizations are publicly funded or receive public funds, for example universities, colleges, public radio, or PBS. Others donating to BLM are 501(c)3 nonprofit organizations, including traditional nonprofits and some healthcare organizations. A lot of these have wanted to be public in their support of BLM, and have announced their donations via press release or to the media.

Key point for all 501(c)3 organizations is that they shall not participate in politics. No use of resources, no donations, no time spent can benefit any particular candidate at any level of government. The same regulations apply to organizations with public funding or grants. If these organizations violate these rules, they lose their tax exempt status or all of their public funding. It's a very black and white rule.

So, with that established, we know now that all donations "to BLM" are actually to ActBlue which is absolutely, no question, a political arm of the DNC.

It seems to me that a form letter could be sent to every college/university in the country inquiring if they have donated to "BLM" via ActBlue, and if they fail to respond or produce an affirmative NO answer threaten suit. This would quickly result in these donations being refunded, or the liberal organizations losing their tax shields/federal funding.

Really seems like a win-win. Am I missing anything?