24
NewsGuard 24 points ago +25 / -1

Yep. And set low expectations, so when SCOTUS hears the case (they will), it's already a win (and BIGLY) in the public consciousness

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +3 / -1

Set low expectations and then when the case gets heard by SCOTUS (which normies won't expect), Trump will be back in play BIGLY.

9
NewsGuard 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)

We are all Team Trump, and not all of us are aware of it. The only reason these cucks have power is because they operate in darkness. It’s important to let them know they won’t be re-elected if they betray The People.

10
NewsGuard 10 points ago +12 / -2

This is a proactive not reactive post. It’d be better to have this reach the top than a post in 2 weeks about how we all hate him

5
NewsGuard 5 points ago +5 / -0 (edited)

Glenn Greenwald has shown us that an allegiance to truth rather than party is actually possible with the left. There are surely a sizeable portion of Obama appointees who wouldn’t even stand for this crap.

6
NewsGuard 6 points ago +6 / -0 (edited)

Which is why I think it’s more likely that, instead of backstabbing the dude who appointed him, they recognize that a SCOTUS ruling would be much more beneficial. The media is trying to gaslight us into believing that SCOTUS won’t even take up the case as it’s ‘baseless’.

9
NewsGuard 9 points ago +9 / -0 (edited)
  1. they only counted a portion of the ballots. normally this type of statistical analysis would be adequate, however, the big tech oligarchs designed the technology that tells them which 'random' ballots to check
  2. they could've rigged the recount
  3. the machine can print & mark ballots
2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0 (edited)

I am fairly sure they said they wouldn’t vote for Trump if certification was for Biden. They never said they would send anybody ;)

11
NewsGuard 11 points ago +11 / -0

It seems increasingly more likely that MI won’t send electors

17
NewsGuard 17 points ago +17 / -0

I don’t even wanna think about how indistinguishable these are going to be in 2 years

0
NewsGuard 0 points ago +1 / -1

The real problem is the climate change information center which they want to make everyone visit. This is how they want to enact their one-world government plan -- with censorship and (mis)education.

0
NewsGuard 0 points ago +1 / -1 (edited)

Romney's a globalist. I listened to a Great Reset podcast and they're confident in him siding with the Dems if Republicans hold the Senate.

1
NewsGuard 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s safe to say they would be overseeing the end of the Republic if they approve of last minute, unconstitutional election changes. Might’ve been the case pre-ACB.

1
NewsGuard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fauci funded coronavirus bat research in the Wuhan lab that’s near the wet market they’re obsessed with.

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’m not the most religious person out there but I’ve had the same thoughts — the timing is just too perfect

3
NewsGuard 3 points ago +3 / -0

The body of scientists that inform their government during emergencies

20
NewsGuard 20 points ago +20 / -0

https://www.wisn.com/article/statewide-recount-would-cost-trump-campaign-nearly-dollar8-million/34693787

“The legal team continues to examine the issues with irregularities in Wisconsin and are leaving all legal options open, including a recount and an audit,” Jenna Ellis said in a statement to WISN 12 News, a Trump campaign legal advisor.

The only action the campaign can request is a recount.

I think this means that if the recount finds anything dodgy, it could create cause for an audit

20
NewsGuard 20 points ago +20 / -0

If Trump is paying $8m for it and they try to pull their Georgia shenanigans on us, we will raise hell on them

10
NewsGuard 10 points ago +10 / -0

inb4 David makes another tweet saying it was a typo

1
NewsGuard 1 point ago +1 / -0

Agreed. Just highlighting a possibility to counter the doomer narrative

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›