2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

He already accepted the runoff and all the articles I've read about GA really emphasise that the recount is for the presidential election, so I've inferred that the runoff will occur no matter what. Can you cite anything definitively to the contrary? I think it's better to be safe than sorry

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

From articles I've read, they made a point of saying that the recount is for the presidential race.

3
NewsGuard 3 points ago +3 / -0

At this rate of egregious fraud, the Trump Team will secure Big T's reelection. We have to get Perdue reelected though. My ideas:

  1. Donate, despite the fact that they will probably squander that money

  2. Join his team if you're nearby and counter-harvest

  3. The DNC hires people to shill on Facebook. Follow all the local news sources in Georgia and comment/shill on related posts.

  4. if you live in Georgia, you need to get eveeeeryone you know on board.

12
NewsGuard 12 points ago +13 / -1

That's the thing though, I don't think there was any fraud in the Senate race. Now that they know how many people voted for him, they will try to make up the deficit using Stacey Abrams' ballot harvesting loophole.

38
NewsGuard 38 points ago +38 / -0

I know, politicians are retarded, but we CANNOT let them take the Senate.

At this rate of egregious fraud, the Trump Team will secure Big T's reelection. We have to get Perdue reelected though. My ideas:

  1. Donate, despite the fact that they will probably squander that money

  2. Join his team if you're nearby and counter-harvest

  3. The DNC hires people to shill on Facebook. Follow all the local news sources in Georgia and comment/shill on related posts.

  4. if you live in Georgia, you need to get eveeeeryone you know on board.

6
NewsGuard 6 points ago +6 / -0

The fraud is glaringly obvious and they know it won't hold. Trump will win but they will takeover the senate if their plan is successful. My thread outlines it here: https://thedonald.win/p/11PpPMEetl/biden-will-not-win-by-way-of-the/

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Ok, so I was wrong about the impeachment part, that requires 2/3rds, but we can't trust the establishment GOP in that regard anyway. They will make life incredibly difficult though.

How? We can't trust them not to cheat like they are right now. Big tech won't run political ads for anyone now, and MSM will be relentlessly in attack mode. Harvesting is allowed in GA under some loophole which the Dems are currently using, we'll need to use it too

47
NewsGuard 47 points ago +47 / -0

Based. Maybe they can help us establish some Democrat smuggling routes to Cuba for those who want to experience socialism.

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

That sort of thing tends to happen when you ban half your userbase LOL

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Gotta love how they’re frantically changing their outlooks because they’re going to be out of business in a few weeks

1
NewsGuard 1 point ago +2 / -1

I have 10k karma on this account. You can rest assured I’m not a DNC shill lmao

You have a point, but usually with these things the vast majority of money floods in from those in-the-know. You can’t tell me there are people placing $100,000 bets based on the RCP average. There’s so much data you’d have to ignore to arrive at Trump only having a 1 in 3 chance when he is completely dominating the states he needs to.

However, if I’ve learnt anything this year, there are a lot of ‘uncritical’ thinkers out there. I also thought people would know the truth about COVID by now, but here we are.

2
NewsGuard 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thanks! That's exactly the type of analysis I was looking for.

1
NewsGuard 1 point ago +1 / -0

i'm not sure what's happening because all (real) indicators point to a Trump victory.

Is there a really elaborate voter fraud scheme going on, as Joe said? Or are billionaires like Soros willing to lose a few million by swaying the odds, just to make Biden look stronger?

1
NewsGuard 1 point ago +1 / -0

I thought Q last posted in 2018. Is that them?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›