I would argue it doesn't matter until you put pen on paper. Everything is fluid. Verbal agreements, handshake deals mean nothing.
What i was saying is that thr left pushes their extreme left views so that they can repeat the same "slightly left of center" arguments, even though those agreements are moot because we've conceded on those issues.
Ex: We are a pro-abortion country due to roe v wade. Abortion legal until 3rd trimester. Why do dems keep pushing the issue for 3rd trimester abortion? Because they want to push "women's rights" even though those rights have already been established.
How do we use this same tactic against them to redpill? Would it even work without a daily propoganda machine like the NYT/CNN/NBC/CBS/ABC/Twitter/Facebook?
You've opened my eyes, man.
All this "Yeah but Trump is an [insert slur here]" has been countermessaging from the start.
Actually, it makes sense why they keep going with the weak virtue signals now.
At this point, gay people have all the same rights in the US. So why keep going with the "bake us a cake" levels of craziness? It's because they can just keep saying "yeah but gay people deserve the same rights" and know that people will generally agree, despite the fact that it's already been done.
It makes sense why they're pushing illegals' rights, because most people would agree that immigrants shouldn't be subject to prejudice. They conflate an innocuous, mass held opinion with a radical idea, not because they want to make progress on the radical idea, but so they can keep pushing the conflated but generally agreed on opinion.
Deepstate runs deep.
You can't take out one corrupt politician without pulling a bunch of other ones with them, because they all have dirt on each other.
What I'm saying is he would have no GOP support to clear house, because they're re equally corrupt. If you don't believe me, remember that only 7/53 GOP senators objected to the EC results on the 6th.
This is some burning of the Reichstag false flag shit.
If you believe that the "false flag" theory about the capitol trespassing is a conspiracy, remember that it was done in Nazi Germany.
What we're seeing now is the Kristallnacht.
I read the article as well.
Their claim basically hinges upon the assertion that these were previously, legally opened ballots.
That assertion would be a lot more believable if they would show us the video of how the containers ended up underneath the table.
My thinking is that the table had a connected platform underneath with the containers on it, so that when it was brought onto the floor, the, boxes were brought in as well. It's a "magic trick", which explains why nobody saw the ballots being placed underneath the table.
At this point, the burden of evidence to show video evidence of when the containers were placed is on the "debunkers", as it's clear that this video should exist if their claims are true.
I love it. You have a suspect in a crime. You have means, motive, and opportunity. You ask a judge for a warrant to gather evidence, and they reject it since you don't currently have any evidence.
Thats the insanity of what's going on here. It's pure circular logic.
Yes! Focus on the election. Proving Biden is corrupt doesn't do shit at this point. Secure presidency, prosecute after. Thats the only order it can be done in.
Prosecute Biden now, Kamala still steals election, China wins.
Secure presidency now, voter ID now, nobody cares about Biden and he'll go to prison with Clinton, China loses.
Theyre afraid of the term "election fraud" because yes, it is real, and the term represents fraudulent counting or reporting.
"Voter Fraud" is much more uncommon, and the term represents when someone votes fraudulently, ie someone ineligible to vote does, or casts multiple ballots or ballots in other peoples names.
They play word games to be able to effectively lie. They say "Voter Fraud is so uncommon and almost never changes election results"... Which is technically true. "Election Fraud" on the other hand, is what we saw in this 2020 election, counting ballots multiple times, misreporting results, etc.
TLDR: Stop talking about "Voter Fraud" and start talking about "Election Fraud" so the news media can't play word games.
Bad news, looks like activist judge denied it.
Unfortunately the constitution has a very narrow definition of Treason:
Section 3 Treason Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.
Maybe call Edison research (1.908.707.4707) per their website claiming to be a reporter and ask them if they can clarify the irregularities.(If you call, record the hell out of it and fwd to Fitton)
They'll be looking to throw anyone else under the bus, if it comes out that the Edison data is bad on such a huge scale, nobody will ever trust that company again. If Edison throws Dominion under the bus, then we'll have evidence on tape.
The proof is in the ass-covering.
The news just broke that a whole bunch of GOV code was hacked.
Wanna bet it's for plausible deniability when they get caught?
"It wasn't us, it was the <Insert country here> hackers meddling in our elections!"
Yeah, I was just trying to say that they don't strictly speaking need it.
You really need to be an expert technician or engineer to achieve privacy, considering all the crap Spyware loaded on consumer devices from the factory.
I wholly recommend a PiHole or other dns sinkhole for your home networks
Hate to say it, doc, but they don't need a GPS chip in the phone to get your location. It's possible to triangulate you off of cell towers.
And as far as a land-line goes, they have your address.
If you want privacy on the internet, get a VPN you trust.
Pretty sure that's a felony... Right?