Yes. It's been mischaracterized to the point where people here didn't even balk when the title had "trump defends rioters" in it.
Trump did no such thing because there wasn't any rioting; there was a peaceful protest, and then a splinter group broke off and walked inside the capitol, encountering no real resistance and without weapons.
If that's true, Trump fucked them big time with operation warpspeed and getting multiple vaccines out before biden could fraudulently steal power.
Now, even though dem govs are rolling them out at a snail's pace, the optics don't look good for keeping up the lock downs
Exactly what I was explaining to anyone who will listen. When government corruption runs rampant, whoever has the most chips makes the rules.
Edit: if you don't believe me, look at ehat happened with the gamestop trading freeze, or literally any big tech lawsuit.
Hey man, if yoi know differently, enlighten me! To the best of my knowledge, the whole point of a PUD was to regulate public utility revenues.
Why wouldn't the power company be able to argue to the PUD that the cost of power distribution is higher due to not using Chinese parts, and then argue that it needs to be allowed to have more revenue?
Not true at all. Public utilities are granted a monopoly, on the stipulation that profits are capped to a certain percentage.
The power companies will simply charge more for electricity if maintenance becomes more expensive. (which is why they don't mind at all being forced to buy renewable energy credits... They just pass the extra cost on to you!)
I mean, the redpill here is "what would you expect to happen to you if you tried to circumvent the border checkpoints of a sovereign nation?" "what would happen to you if you tried to break into literally any other country on the planet?"
This is 100% bullshit.
No matter where you find yourself on the battlefield, you will find asymmetry. The time has come for a political form of asymmetric warfare.
We have lost certain opportunities and gained new ones. Where we go from here depends on how we recognize and capitalize the opportunities that we have right now.
One of the best opportunities is that of "the noble opposition". There are bad things that the government has done for 50 years, things that 90% of the people can agree are bad. Make the illegal administration take the blame for continuing these things!
Ask "Why are we still at war?" paint that message everywhere you can! Ask why Biden won't acknowledge the Armenian Genocide! Declare to the people the atrocities of the Fed & SEC!
Additionally, we can play dem special interests against each other better now. As bad as the GOP looked infighting during the first 2 Trump years, we can make dems look worse. The 50/50 senate split is the greatest opportunity ever to stymie a legislative agenda.
We need every dem senator to hang their votes on special interests that screw over other dem senators. If you're not sure how this works, look at how New Jersey, with a solid dem majority and a dem mayor still havent managed to legalize weed, making them all look like fools.
Basically theyre saying that we're having the opposite of a Nuclear Winter. Not too crazy. What IS crazy is that they have little imperial evidence to assert any of their assumptions.
I would argue it doesn't matter until you put pen on paper. Everything is fluid. Verbal agreements, handshake deals mean nothing.
What i was saying is that thr left pushes their extreme left views so that they can repeat the same "slightly left of center" arguments, even though those agreements are moot because we've conceded on those issues.
Ex: We are a pro-abortion country due to roe v wade. Abortion legal until 3rd trimester. Why do dems keep pushing the issue for 3rd trimester abortion? Because they want to push "women's rights" even though those rights have already been established.
How do we use this same tactic against them to redpill? Would it even work without a daily propoganda machine like the NYT/CNN/NBC/CBS/ABC/Twitter/Facebook?
You've opened my eyes, man.
All this "Yeah but Trump is an [insert slur here]" has been countermessaging from the start.
Actually, it makes sense why they keep going with the weak virtue signals now.
At this point, gay people have all the same rights in the US. So why keep going with the "bake us a cake" levels of craziness? It's because they can just keep saying "yeah but gay people deserve the same rights" and know that people will generally agree, despite the fact that it's already been done.
It makes sense why they're pushing illegals' rights, because most people would agree that immigrants shouldn't be subject to prejudice. They conflate an innocuous, mass held opinion with a radical idea, not because they want to make progress on the radical idea, but so they can keep pushing the conflated but generally agreed on opinion.
Deepstate runs deep.
You can't take out one corrupt politician without pulling a bunch of other ones with them, because they all have dirt on each other.
What I'm saying is he would have no GOP support to clear house, because they're re equally corrupt. If you don't believe me, remember that only 7/53 GOP senators objected to the EC results on the 6th.
This is some burning of the Reichstag false flag shit.
If you believe that the "false flag" theory about the capitol trespassing is a conspiracy, remember that it was done in Nazi Germany.
What we're seeing now is the Kristallnacht.
I read the article as well.
Their claim basically hinges upon the assertion that these were previously, legally opened ballots.
That assertion would be a lot more believable if they would show us the video of how the containers ended up underneath the table.
My thinking is that the table had a connected platform underneath with the containers on it, so that when it was brought onto the floor, the, boxes were brought in as well. It's a "magic trick", which explains why nobody saw the ballots being placed underneath the table.
At this point, the burden of evidence to show video evidence of when the containers were placed is on the "debunkers", as it's clear that this video should exist if their claims are true.
I love it. You have a suspect in a crime. You have means, motive, and opportunity. You ask a judge for a warrant to gather evidence, and they reject it since you don't currently have any evidence.
Thats the insanity of what's going on here. It's pure circular logic.
PSA: Epoch Times is run by "The good chinese" aka Falun Gong (traditionalist chinese abroad at odds with the ccp).
They're also the group behind Shen Yun!