1
NoInfo 1 point ago +1 / -0

Where did I say it was an audit? Listen you want to swallow everything everyone posts fine but I prefer to think for myself. Someone made a claim, I followed the backup and it doesn't jive.

If your case gets thrown out for whatever reason, corrupt or not you lost that case. We were told that they were holding on to the evidence until they got to the Supreme Court but with all their cases being dismissed, lost or withdrawn they aren't going to make it there. Even OANN, NewsMax and FOX won't discuss fraud because of liability suits suggesting they have no evidence.

If "they" have "the receipts" they need to bring them out for Trump's defense or it doesn't exist.

0
NoInfo 0 points ago +1 / -1

You can call me misinformed all you want. There are links on every single case and you can click on them are read.

Like this one labeled TBD Ward v. Jackson, No. CV2020-015285

But if you follow the link... 12/04/2020: Order/Ruling, The court held that the evidence did not demonstrate fraud or misconduct, since the court's ordered audit and the forensic examiners found a small number of duplicate ballots and a low error rate, without any impact on the outcome. The court denied relief and confirmed the election certification.

1
NoInfo 1 point ago +1 / -0

My point is simple. When you add all election lawsuits filed from Jan 2020 -11/3/2020 Trump has won more than 1/3rd of those cases but ZERO of them asserted fraud. They were all about when and how votes would be cast and counted.

When you look at all the cases filed 11/4/2020 on the Trump campaign has won a single case and again it wasn't alleging fraud. It shortened the time voters had to correct their ballots.

Of those few cases that assert fraud they are either dismissed for lack of evidence or voluntarily withdrawn. I clicked on a few of the TBD cases and everyone I clicked on has been dismissed.

I want this evidence more than anyone but despite everyone claiming to "have the receipts" no one ever shows it.

1
NoInfo 1 point ago +1 / -0

If you look at that list you will notice that the vast majority of the wins took place before the election and were based on process not fraud. In fact of the two wins following the election, both were filed on November 4th, both were process complaints and in reality one of them was dismissed due to errors in the filing.

1
NoInfo 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is what I am saying.

LA county, CA has 10,150,558 people in it. Loving County, Texas has 169 people.

That is why that map that floats around every election listing results by county is stupid. More than half the states in the US have a smaller population than LA County.

-4
NoInfo -4 points ago +2 / -6

Not sure what a "handshake" is but this is BS! Who cares how old my account is? Enrique rolled and you don't care fine... me personally I like my rebel leaders to not work with the Feds.

-2
NoInfo -2 points ago +1 / -3

This really is GREAT news! Rudy doesn't even have to be right to win this case! All Rudy has to do is show evidence that would lead an average person to believe what he said about Dominion to be true. Finally he will release the evidence and it will be public!