1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Been a portfolio manager for over 25 years you faggot bitch.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nopa 1 point 6 hours ago +1 / -0 Thats not really an argument

Fuck you faggot. Get some reading comprehension.

4
NoMoreMao 4 points ago +4 / -0

Reminder that in war comms go first. The focus isn't on government buildings and sites.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nopa the fucktard says:

Its the same entity: The government. How would you get them back? Those arent yours. Those are the soc sec admin's

You don't have any reading comprehension. Fuck off faggot.

2
NoMoreMao 2 points ago +2 / -0

The capitol is a whorehouse.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Nopa “Soc sec only holds treasuries

"I'll get back in increments what I paid in SS taxes for as long as I'm alive as long as SS is solvent."

Who argued otherwise?”

That’s not what I said you fucking idiot.

I specifically said the Treasury and it was in reference to IOUs it issued.

Reading compression asswipe.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck you asshole. You're just arguing semantics.

So you don't think the Treasury holds notes, bills and repo agreements. You are a stupid fuck.

Just because you can win arguments with your fucking inbred family doesn't mean you can puke your stupid semantical bullshit here and have people think you're profound.

I'll bet you every fucking welfare check you get for the rest of your life that when it comes time for me to retire I'll get back in increments what I paid in SS taxes for as long as I'm alive as long as SS is solvent.

PUOSTFU.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

It is and it had to be initially funded and now it has to be adjusted from time to time due to actuarial changes.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

You said it could be used in Texas. Why would you suggest such a thing if you didn't think it was viable?

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

You insinuated it by using 80 year old data when the SS trust was initially being funded.

Before you said it wasn't a trust. Now you say it is.

All the Treasury holds are IOUs in the form of dollar bills, treasury bonds, notes, bills and repo agreements that it gets to decide are valuable. You don't have a fucking problem with that though do you?

I never said any of it was fiscally sound. I said as long as SS was solvent then I get back what I paid minus inflation. If that weren't the case then millions of people over decades wouldn't have have been able to retire.

You're the one advocated a socialist ponzi scheme be used to fund Texas retirement in the case of secession. Fucking stupid;

Just STFU asswipe.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re a stupid fucking asswipe for wanting to adopt a socialist system you want Texas to escape from.

Fuck you you stupid fuck.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Fuck you. You just flap your stupid fucking gums about semantic bullshit.

Show me where today people get back more SS than they paid. You can’t because you’re a fucking moron using 80 year old data that only shows where the SS trust had to be funded so naturally people who were early payers and then retired soon after we’re given more benefits than they paid.

SS is a tax that funds a fucking trust that you claimed isn’t a trust. Trusts have to be initially funded.

Show me an example today of where somebody gets more SS than they paid in.

PUOSTFU asswipe.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

Why would I want to move to Texas when it will turn blue once all the illegals are amnestied and the borders are open?

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

You pay interest to yourself because your money is locked up by a contract.

It pretty simple if you’re sophisticated enough to know how it works.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

You are borrowing from yourself because you pay interest on the loan.

A Ponzi scheme uses the investments of later investors to pay earlier investors. That is the definition and that’s what SS does. You’re putting arbitrary definitions on the term because you just want to be argumentative.

0
NoMoreMao 0 points ago +1 / -1

So you’re going to use an anecdotal story of the first person to receive a SS check as an argument? What a clown.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s not. It’s borrowing from the insurance policy that is.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

People borrow from their insurance all the time.

You just want to be semantical and argumentative.

1
NoMoreMao 1 point ago +1 / -0

You’re borrowing from yourself. It’s the money you put in the insurance policy. Any retard can see that.

SS is a Ponzi scheme. Just like all Ponzi schemes the last one in gets left holding the bag if it goes insolvent.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›