Before I begin: "Q" was a fake propaganda campaign and psychological warfare tactic, probably run by the FBI / CIA, to drain the energy of Trump supporters and convince them to do nothing and sit on their asses (because some magical savior was going to do everything for them). If you fell for it, please increase your IQ before participating in the conservative / nationalist movement again.

Do you know what else has a similar dampening effect on right wing activism? Guns. You own them, you may have fantasized about using them, the federal agents on this website would LOVE for you to use them, but you probably shouldn't (except for home defense or all out war, but neither of those is currently happening).

(repost)

Right wingers may be holding themselves back in terms of how we can operate in public by focusing too much on bearing arms. Especially when it comes to events where leftists have threatened to cancel something or attack a monument.

There is a deeply ingrained conservative belief that you MUST have your guns to defend yourself, and attending an event with the possibility of leftist violence while unarmed is suicide. But there is also a keen awareness that the courts are extremely corrupt and the right to self defense is being destroyed, with law abiding 2A supporters being victims of lawfare for defending themselves from the mob. Not only with guns but drivers being crucified for fleeing a mob. Unlike the left, conservatives have lives and jobs they don't want to lose - and understandably so.

But what happens when you combine this conservative belief about armed self-defense with wise skepticism of the corrupt legal system? Unfortunately in many cases you get inaction and people staying home after a painful risk-reward analysis. And the left goes unchecked and continues to dominate the public square, destroy monuments, erase history and groom kids at "drag queen story hour". I don't care about leftists looting and destroying their own shithole neighborhoods but allowing them to destroy important symbols of the nation is not good. It's demoralizing and humiliating and to undecided people we appear weak which is not attractive.

So how do we solve this? One way is to show up in large enough numbers without guns. You are trading away legal risk for physical risk but in many cases it has worked. A perfect example would be the Italians defending the Columbus statue in Philadelphia. Yes the legal system is corrupt but the risks you run by shoving away violent aggressors are way lower than discharging your firearm in public. When you rally sufficient numbers and stick together and watch each other's backs you can do well. It's not like the scrawny soy losers facing you are very tough or brave. And it's easier to rally the numbers needed when people aren't so freaked out about going to prison for life on corrupt charges related to firearms.

What will most likely happen? You'll successfully achieve your objective and go home with minimal injury and legal risk. It's even worked on Berkeley's campus before in 2017, we cleared antifa out of their home territory without guns.

What happens if you accidentally kill someone with a punch? It's possible but not likely. What happens if a leftist decides to pull out a gun and shoot you while you're unarmed? Again it's not likely but if the left starts shooting unarmed targets, you can bet that a hot civil war won't be far behind. The left actually realizes this and it's one of the reasons why antifa doesn't use guns.

And the final question: do you have a better idea besides watching the left dominate the public square and the culture?

That doesn't mean we shouldn't raid mainstream platforms though. Once your main accounts are safely located elsewhere, you can violate the terms of service of mainstream platforms and spam them with redpills and memes and avoid all the bans you want. Fuck their rules!

Right wingers may be holding themselves back in terms of how we can operate in public by focusing too much on bearing arms. Especially when it comes to events where leftists have threatened to cancel something or attack a monument.

There is a deeply ingrained conservative belief that you MUST have your guns to defend yourself, and attending an event with the possibility of leftist violence while unarmed is suicide. But there is also a keen awareness that the courts are extremely corrupt and the right to self defense is being destroyed, with law abiding 2A supporters being victims of lawfare for defending themselves from the mob. Not only with guns but drivers being crucified for fleeing a mob. Unlike the left, conservatives have lives and jobs they don't want to lose - and understandably so.

But what happens when you combine this conservative belief about armed self-defense with wise skepticism of the corrupt legal system? Unfortunately in many cases you get inaction and people staying home after a painful risk-reward analysis. And the left goes unchecked and continues to dominate the public square, destroy monuments, erase history and groom kids at "drag queen story hour". I don't care about leftists looting and destroying their own shithole neighborhoods but allowing them to destroy important symbols of the nation is not good. It's demoralizing and humiliating and to undecided people we appear weak which is not attractive.

So how do we solve this? One way is to show up in large enough numbers without guns. You are trading away legal risk for physical risk but in many cases it has worked. A perfect example would be the Italians defending the Columbus statue in Philadelphia. Yes the legal system is corrupt but the risks you run by shoving away violent aggressors are way lower than discharging your firearm in public. When you rally sufficient numbers and stick together and watch each other's backs you can do well. It's not like the scrawny soy losers facing you are very tough or brave. And it's easier to rally the numbers needed when people aren't so freaked out about going to prison for life on corrupt charges related to firearms.

What will most likely happen? You'll successfully achieve your objective and go home with minimal injury and legal risk. It's even worked on Berkeley's campus before in 2017, we cleared antifa out of their home territory without guns.

What happens if you accidentally kill someone with a punch? It's possible but not likely. What happens if a leftist decides to pull out a gun and shoot you while you're unarmed? Again it's not likely but if the left starts shooting unarmed targets, you can bet that a hot civil war won't be far behind. The left actually realizes this and it's one of the reasons why antifa doesn't use guns.

And the final question: do you have a better idea besides watching the left dominate the public square and the culture?

oh I was talking about South Africa not the US

Okay it's a clickbait title but now that I have your attention I have a good point:

Guns are weird. They're so powerful that most people are understandably terrified to use them, so they rarely get used. If you do use them you are virtually guaranteed to have your life turned upside down by a MSM harassment campaign and you face a real risk of going to prison for a long time or being bankrupted through lawfare (even if you did nothing wrong because the courts are corrupt).

The marxist enemy is keenly aware of this and that's why, as strange as this sounds, they aren't particularly scared of your guns. It's why they're so bold in the face of armed political opponents. In fact they want you to shoot a couple of them (or run them over) to give them super valuable propaganda ammo. They want to demonize your movement, justify further removal of your rights and try to sway undecided people towards the left by portraying you as monsters and murderers, while they are "heroic protesters".

Don't get me wrong, guns and the 2A are extremely important and you should own guns and be well trained with them. But they're a nuclear option.

I see a lot of fantasizing and delusional comments on here about how you would use your 2A and gun down violent threats "in the right situation". Even though that situation almost never happens. It becomes this sad joke where boomers continue to age and talk about how one day they will use their guns. Meanwhile the left continues to destroy society and poison culture in ways that cannot be strategically countered using guns. By the time the scenario comes where you actually get to use your guns, there might be nothing left worth defending.

The worst cope of all is conservatives who think they don't have to do anything more because they own guns, they can even be out of shape blobs who just sit at home with muh guns ready for the civil war (which may never happen, who knows). And if it does happen, allowing the marxists to control every bit of society beyond your front door will guarantee them huge amounts of reinforcements that you could have denied them by getting involved before that point and preventing your culture from being taken over.

We need an unarmed force response. A perfect example would be the Italians defending the Columbus statue in Philadelphia. They didn't bring guns. Just a bunch of big tough guys who aren't afraid of a brawl. Now they have a bunch of advantages:

1. They run much lower legal risks. If some leftist gets in their face and they push them back or start throwing punches, their legal risks and risks of losing their job etc. are trivial compared to firing live rounds.

2. Due to the lower risks, it's easier to convince people to show up - therefore they can muster larger numbers on the ground.

3. It's quicker and more convenient than organizing some sort of armed presence. You just show up. You don't need a bunch of equipment with you.

4. The media cannot portray them as some kind of armed militia terrorist group, and feds can't classify and harass them along those lines either. It denies the enemy propaganda ammo.

5. They have more than enough unarmed force to counter scrawny pathetic soy boys.

TLDR: Be a law abiding gun owner ready for the worst case scenario but be fit and use unarmed force where legally appropriate to defend statues and deny the marxist enemy physical control of the public square (while minimizing your own personal risks, legal and otherwise).

• Marxist-infiltrated academia is brainwashing and creating the marxist terrorists

• Marxist-infiltrated media is propagandizing for them

• Marxist-infiltrated municipalities are paralyzing the police to keep them out of the marxist terrorists' way

• Marxist-infiltrated feds are ignoring their duty to investigate the marxist terrorists while being hyper vigilant against their political opponents

• Marxist-infiltrated courts are acquitting the marxist terrorists while crucifying their political opponents.

The entire corrupt marxist establishment and deep state are conspiring together to radicalize their political opponents. It's one big psy-op.

When their psy-op fails to radicalize enough patsies to give them the terrorist attacks and hate crimes they crave, the left simply lies and fabricates false evidence (Jussie Smollett, Bubba Wallace, every leftist who reports spraypainted swastikas only to have them investigated and it turns out the leftists themselves spraypainted them, etc).

#Blexit probably won't change black voting habits much (+90% democrat). Dumping too much energy into trying to secure a fraction of votes from 13% of the population is strategically retarded. Put energy into securing black votes as much as is proportional to the possible reward but no more.

We've neglected white voters FAR TOO MUCH. We need to start explicitly appealing to them and their interests.