11
No_name_iii 11 points ago +12 / -1

Pretty fucking cool if he was in there ordering you guys food.

1
No_name_iii 1 point ago +1 / -0

Only a matter of time before the tweets start flying. Hopefully tomorrow.

2
No_name_iii 2 points ago +2 / -0

A deal could indicate he gave information. I'm not holding my breath though.

18
No_name_iii 18 points ago +18 / -0

The democrats have been saying that all options are on the table...

2
No_name_iii 2 points ago +2 / -0

I got my stimulus check chambered in .45. What about you?

1
No_name_iii 1 point ago +1 / -0

If I had the time, I would try variations of this on leftist sites as an infiltrator. Also, something along the lines of "4 more years of Trump will advance the revolutionary cause...vote Trump for the communist revolution!"

3
No_name_iii 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ah, misread that. Still doesn't change much though. Surely there is someone who can be trusted with the money and doesn't care about being publicly associated with the site.

2
No_name_iii 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe we should make a trade with China. The art of the deal.

12
No_name_iii 12 points ago +12 / -0

Not everyone on here cares if their identity is known. I couldn't give 2 shits if it came out that I donated a few dollars to the site. If you donate to Trump, your identity is public. Whats the difference?

2
No_name_iii 2 points ago +2 / -0

Lol, just watched this a couple nights ago

2
No_name_iii 2 points ago +3 / -1

its not Trumps responsibility to run cover for a group that cant hold off on stirring up shit until after the election.

1
No_name_iii 1 point ago +1 / -0

Sometimes when going through my regular list of sites looking for new news, muscle memory causes me to type in drudge. I hate myself for giving him a page view when it loads and I realize my mistake.

2
No_name_iii 2 points ago +2 / -0

Trends are meaningful, provided the pollster used the same methodology for each poll.

0
No_name_iii 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm just saying I looked at his comments and they seemed like a person who supports Trump, but is prone to negativity. Maybe I didn't look closely enough and they are a convincing shill. Doesnt really matter though. They made a comment that essentially said they had hoped for more from the debate. I hoped for a knockout as well, though I feel like Biden is the one who is weakened based on their performances. Biden looked old and frail and acted completely contrary to his marketed image. Ill count that as a win.

-1
No_name_iii -1 points ago +1 / -2

Lol, you are a paranoid person. I really don't care if he is a downer. Half those comments you posted above represent pretty popular positions on this site. I can tolerate some negativity, but to think someone would make so many comments that can't be interpreted as shilling just to sprinkle the occasional shill comment means this is an incredibly subtle shill. On top of that, since he and I are the same person, we are doubly dedicated, as im sure this is the only comment you can describe as shilling from my history (which is actually just a defense of a fellow Trump supporter disappointed that Trump didn't knock Joe out in one debate).

-2
No_name_iii -2 points ago +1 / -3

Their comment history doesn't seem suspicious. Not every Trump supporter is convinced of a victory. His concern that Trump isn't getting his message out is rational, even if you don't agree that it's the truth.

Personally I feel last night was a wash and may be more damaging to Biden (destroys his image of civility his ads harp on and on about), but people hoping for a knockout have reason to be disappointed. It wasn't one.

8
No_name_iii 8 points ago +8 / -0

ALL GUNS MATTER! Honestly, finishing an 80% lower looks like a pain in the ass. It would be a fun project, but not something I would want to do several times. I'd rather buy finished lowers and lose them in a boating accident.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›