3
Norman_F_Dixon 3 points ago +3 / -0

AFTEREARTH / 2013

"Fear is not real.
The only place that fear can exist is in one's thoughts of the future.
It is a product of our imagination causing us to fear things
that do not at present, and may not in the future, ever exist.
That is near insanity.
Do not misunderstand, danger is very real.
But fear is a choice.
We are telling ourselves a story."

2
Norman_F_Dixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Or this:

ENEMY OF THE STATE (1998) DVD / Chapter 22 - 1:39:32 -> 1:41:03

Gene Hackman's character, Brill, gives this speech...

"If they are big and you are small,
You are mobile and they are not.
You only fight the battles you can win.
That's the way the Viet Cong did it.
You capture their weapons and then
Use them against them the next time.
That way they are supplying you.
You grow strong as they grow weak."

And the camera pans from left to right
In neon lights in the background...
"Dark -> Light / Dark -> Light"

What a coincidence.

3
Norman_F_Dixon 3 points ago +3 / -0

When I drive my car my seat belt crosses over my left shoulder.

Hmmmmmm.....

3
Norman_F_Dixon 3 points ago +3 / -0

Out of an estimated U.S. population of 331,404,570 that's between 13,256,182 and 19,884,274 lost forever.

We are going to see a whole lot of this (clip above) and probably a whole lot worse. They are going to be jumping off rooftops before it is all over.

Don't let them grab on to you as they go literally over the edge.

2
Norman_F_Dixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

................BOOM
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
..................RBG

https://youtu.be/42xzsq7St88 (46 SECONDS)

2
deleted 2 points ago +2 / -0
1
Norman_F_Dixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

The recommendation to read back through my history on this subject, in particular comments which mention Jonathan Winer and the Magnitsky Act, will go a long way to answering your question as to why you should care now.

I see your 2 years of no indictments and raise you 8 more years of no indictments.

If after you have read those comments in my history that are relative to the above post, and still have a question as to why you should care now, I will be happy to engage further.

My intent in tracking this particular subject (The Magnitsky Act Hoax of 2010-12... which is the most recent prelude to the Russia Hoax of 2016... and which also had/has the same goal of smearing Putin/Russia with a false scandal, (perpetrated by a majority of the same people who are behind the Russia Hoax), in order to poison any possibility of something resembling normal international relations not only with Russia but a number of other nations)... that intent is to maintain continuity on this subject and the conspirators behind it... so that when that hand grenade mentioned above is finally thrown into the deep state swamp... there will be a record for this community to quickly access for historical context.

2
Norman_F_Dixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here is a link to the Senate Homeland and Governmental Affairs Committee business meeting held yesterday on 9/16/20. This is the one the linked Fox News article above totally mis-characterizes in its reporting.

Start the clip and then go to time 20:46 for the start of the meeting. The full meeting is 22 minutes long... but you only need to listen to the first 6 minutes when Chairman Johnson (R) and Ranking Member Peters give their opening remarks to understand exactly what this meeting and vote were about.

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/09/09/2020/business-meeting-

Or - read Chairman Johnson full opening remarks below if playing the video clip is a problem for you:

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Opening%20Statement-Johnson-2020-09-16.pdf

The committee met and voted on most of the subpoenas for all the big names (Brennan, Comey, Powers, Strzok, etc) a few weeks back.

Yesterday's meeting was to vote on adding 7 new names to the earlier approved list and authorizing a request for additional documentation... and in the "Are You Not Entertained" category... for Chairman Johnson to publicly ream Ranking Member Peters.

What Chairman Johnson lays bare is the blatant effort of the Democrats (and their Lawfare allies) to block the deposition of Jonathan Winer (one of the subpoenas voted on weeks ago). As you will hear, or read in Johnson's opening remarks, Jonathan Winer was one of two witnesses (read "co-conspirators") who refused to be interviewed by DOJ I.G. Horowitz during his investigation of Crossfire Hurricane.

For most readers... particularly our foreign readers, the name, Jonathan Winer, will be unfamiliar and obscure. Winer will turn out to be a key witness as well as a key conspirator with a very long track record with Christopher Steel, (back to the days when Steel was the Chief of the Russia Desk for MI6). That is one of the main reasons why the Democrats and Lawfare have been fighting so long and so hard to keep investigators away from Winer and to keep him out of sight of the public. There are others just as damning.

High chance of Arkancide with this guy. He is holding a very very big can of worms.

The Russia Hoax / Steele dossier is just the latest hoax Winer has been a central player in. One hoax and smear campaign eventually resulted in the Magnitsky Act, which is the legislation sponsored by Sen McCain (R) and Sen Cardin (D) that brought sanctions against Russia beginning in 2012.

If you like rabbit holes that actually lead somewhere, start reading back through my history... lots of info and links to other video clips and documents. They are not hard to find. Simply too much to shoehorn in here.

I have been watching scenes, like the one that occurred between Johnson and Peters about Jonathan Winer, in past House and Senate committee meetings for over two years now. Republicans have been shutting down a lot of Democrat bullshit just by mentioning WIner's name (sometimes almost just a seemingly casual mention) in the course of proceedings, and the result is like pulling the pin on a hand grenade and holding it your hand not releasing the actuator.

17
Norman_F_Dixon 17 points ago +17 / -0

From President Trump's Labor Day Speech today, 7 Sep 2020...

This was something different:

"No. China's been very bad. On top of which we had the China Plague sent to us... and other viruses, nothing near this serious, but the swine... . We had other viruses sent in over the years. So... came from China. I wonder why?"

Watch the clip. These are not scripted remarks / he is not reading from the prepared remarks (on paper in front of him - no teleprompter).

https://youtu.be/2zCEP4tkDWQ?t=1189 (time stamp / 17 seconds for remarks)

These are very strong words, implying as near to a statement of fact that you can get, without outright stating it, that not only was the Wuhan flu purposefully spread to the United States by China... but China has done this multiple times in the past. Note the President's query, "I wonder why?"

In normal times a statement like this made publicly by a head of state about the actions of another country would result in an immediate diplomatic demarche by the country maligned.

But... we are obviously not living in normal times...
More like we are living in "interesting times".

17
Norman_F_Dixon 17 points ago +21 / -4

Moderator only read the first paragraph of the question to Binney... and so missed just about every salient point that was being raised for consideration and comment.

Granted the question is complex... too bad we won't be getting the benefit of Binney's take on this issue.

Time will have to suffice until we get some light into this particular deep state act.

Keep it on your radar for now.

57
Norman_F_Dixon 57 points ago +60 / -3

Given the Russians did not hack the DNC, and given that the level of 2016 Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies Internet-based election influence was less then negligible, why, on 29 December 2016, were 35 Russians declared Persona Non Grata, given two days to leave the country and two diplomatic facilities closed?

An analysis based on Occam's Razor (of two competing theories, the simplest is preferred) and on Nguyen van Phred's Maxim ("The secret bombings in Cambodia were no secret to the Cambodians.") poses some interesting potentialities.

Apply Occam's Razor and the simple theory floats that the Russia Hoax plotters wanted to amplify the smear effect of claiming massive Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies, pro-Trump election interference at the same time forcing a poison pill down the throat of any possibility for there to be anything approaching normal U.S. / Russian government-to-government relations. Not bad for a two-fer.

It would also taint any effort made public by the Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies to be proactive providing information antithetical to the Russia Hoax narrative, as it would be proof positive of a pro-Trump position. So its more a hat-trick than a tow-fer.

However, with a hat tip to van Prhed, it seems prudent to take into account. that not only did the Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies know that they did not hack the DNC, they knew exactly what their level of " election interference" was.

Additionally, it would also seem to prudent to factor in that the Russian Government / Intelligence Agency /ies were well aware of the active measures the DNC, in coordination with rouge elements of the U.S. Government, were engaged in elements of the Russia Hoax.

"The Russia Hoax was no secret to the Russians" and they had the capability to know a great deal about what was going on. Its not like they had to go to a FISA court to get a warrant to monitor communications of American government officials in the United States and more importantly... when the hoax plotters were operating in Europe.

Have you given this side show of the greater Russia Hoax much consideration.

8
Norman_F_Dixon 8 points ago +8 / -0

Trump has already exposed the World Health Organization as a shakedown / protection / vaccine scam operation.

Wait until he exposes the international human rights organizations' scams.
Same MO, different front organizations.

It isn't all a shakedown operation though... the same cartoon could have had a duplex building with the money going into the BLM building on one side... but the money coming out of an attached laundry.

1
Norman_F_Dixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

President Trump Ingraham Interview / 30 Sep 2020

https://youtu.be/N7mDddUjZx8?t=907 (time stamped / watch 73 seconds)

President Trump could not have said it any plainer...

"People that you have never heard of."
"People that are in the dark shadows."
"... people, that have no idea that if their thing ever succeeded..."

President Trump is talking about the true puppet masters behind the soft coup of the last 4 years and the real coup that is planned. These people have started wars to take power in the past and are willing to start wars to stop President Trump's re-election.

COVID-19 was a warning shot across the bow.

Obama / Biden / Pelosi / Schiff / Nadler / Brennan / Clapper / Comey / Mueller / Wiessmann / Warner / Burr / ... if you know their name... they are paid lackeys.

"The more you know."

1
Norman_F_Dixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

35 Russians declared Persona Non Grata
2 Days to leave the country
2 Diplomatic facilities closed.

Reassess that!!!

2
Norman_F_Dixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

Biden said it in Philly earlier in the day:

Joe Biden / 30 September 2020
https://youtu.be/RMteOa5s-rI?t=204 (time stamp / watch 6 seconds)

Trump, at his press conference, tells you what is really going on:

President Trump / 30 September 2020
https://youtu.be/WH5Qeul_rzU?t=803 (time stamp / watch 14 seconds)

Carlson bird-dogs later on his show:

Tucker Carlson / 30 September 2020
https://youtu.be/FxFrOWgBRLU?t=165 (time stamp / watch 15 seconds)

It is getting clearer and clearer that the criminal elements controlling the corrupt levers of power in government, industry and finance are using any and every means necessary to threaten death and destruction on a national scale if President Trump is re-elected. Biden's threat isn't so much to Trump (because he is not backing down), as it is to the patriots in government, industry and finance who are backing Trump, and more importantly to the voting public, that the corrupt organizations and syndicates (national and trans-national) will burn America and the world down when President Trump is re-elected.

It is not an empty threat.

We have seen President Trump threatened before and seen his response to the threat before... you just have to keep your ears and your eyes open to see it...

President Of The United States / 7 April 2020
https://youtu.be/ctkQ2PLcXxU?t=78 (timestamped / watch 3 seconds)

Director-General Of The World Health Organization / 8 April 2020
https://youtu.be/E92GG3UbE00?t=256 (timestamped / 1 minute, 45 seconds)

President Trump Press Conference / 19 April 2020
https://youtu.be/S1RQD2Oemag?t=2904 (time stamp / watch 60 sec)

"You have more than you know."

12
Norman_F_Dixon 12 points ago +12 / -0

Yuri Bezmenov video... timestamp below to start at 15:34...

https://youtu.be/Y9TviIuXPSE?t=934

This shot is a cut to the audience, immediately pause the clip and look at the guy just to the right of center, partially bald, tan pants, dark blue jacket, light blue shirt, dark blue tie...

Is that a younger 1984 ex-CIA Director John Brennan?

Real or a deep fake?

This same cut to audience shot with the possible young John Brennan is used again at 44:39 and again 55:34 (this last cut seems a little clearer than the first two of these particular audience cuts). Scanned the other audience cuts... NTR.

The clearer 55:34 timestamp below:

https://youtu.be/Y9TviIuXPSE?t=3334

Checked wiki for his dates of employment at the CIA... Brennan started in either 1980 or 81. Recall the Bezmenov video is from 1984... so the timeline fits.

1
Norman_F_Dixon 1 point ago +1 / -0

In the film "White Squall" the maritime hearing (final scene) to investigate the shipwreck of the Albatross takes place on October 1, 1961.

In the film, on the day before the hearing, the surviving boys are discussing what had happened, and one of the boys is reading a newspaper with a front page headline about the hearing and that newspaper is dated 30 September 1961.

An oddity, the actual article under the headline is discusses Robert McNamara's memoir, In Retrospect: The Tragedy and Lessons of Vietnam (1995), which had just been released. The film was released in February of 1996, which put principle filming in 1995 when the book was released and the article was written (byline Lolita Huckaby). The headline and name of the newspaper were mocked up over the article (which has its own peculiarities... but that's for another day).

6
Norman_F_Dixon 6 points ago +6 / -0

The film is about influence, power and money... how to lie, cheat and extort to get them and to keep them... By Any Means Necessary.

We all know that as bad as it is... it is in reality, worse than we can imagine.

Link below to a film that was blocked world-wide from distribution, finally put up on the Internet for free... and just as quickly taken down and banned. It finally became available again through a hosting company for films and documentaries.

If you were shocked by The Trayvon Hoax... wait until you learn about the Magnitsky Act Hoax. Its an earthquake just waiting for the tectonic plates to slip and max out on the Richter Scale.

While you can rent for a one time viewing or buy for unlimited access, highly recommend you purchase the film because you will want to watch it several times to master the details and to be able to show others in time.

Link to reelhouse digital media hosting company and film below:
https://www.reelhouse.org/pirayafilm/the-magnitsky-act-behind-the-scenes

Here are the some of the stars of the film

Jonathan Winer / John McCain / Chrystia Freeland / Hillary Clinton / Ben Cardin / Obama / Bill Browder, and many many more.

The deep state corrupt machinery that enables selling America to the highest bidder has been around for a long time. The Magnitsky Act (sanctions against Russia) was just another hoax in a long line of get rich and CYA under the color of law by buying protection by lining the pockets of U.S. senators and representatives. I am purposefully not tipping the reveal of this film (like the fake witness in The Treyvon Hoax) because like that film, it needs to be experienced for full effect.

Red Notice (Bill Browder's New York Times Best Seller) and The Magnitsky Act - Behind The Scenes (exposing the lies behind the passage of The Magnitsky Act) taken together, is a very large and very "red" red pill.

If you go down this rabbit hole, the follow up is easy... just go to Bill Browders wiki page and go through the references until you find his 2015 deposition. One of the wrinkles there is that one of the lawyers listening in remotely to the deposition is Nataliya Veselnitskaya of the Trump Tower - Don Trump Jr meeting in 2016. Oh, what a tangled and ironic web this one is.

Here are a couple of earlier comments from my history on The Magnitsky Act Hoax if you want more detail before accessing the film:

https://thedonald.win/p/GvB4wc5P/x/c/15JTkXzbUv

https://thedonald.win/p/FMleSQOv/x/c/11Q8SluLPd

2
Norman_F_Dixon 2 points ago +2 / -0

James Comey: Book - A Higher Loyalty / Movie - The Comey Rule
Bill Browder: Book - Red Notice / Movie - (Will be prequel to The Comey Rule)

Bill Browder is the Jeffery Epstein of hedge fund managers.

In the meantime...

Rent or Buy and the watch film very carefully:
https://www.reelhouse.org/pirayafilm/the-magnitsky-act-behind-the-scenes

Like many other films recently, this one was blocked world wide from release in theaters, then constantly taken down from the internet when the film's director put it on the internet for free. Finally got it hosted on reelhouse.

Jonathan Winer / John McCain / Chrystia Freeland / Hillary Clinton / Ben Cardin and many many more.

The deep state corrupt machinery that enables selling America to the highest bidder has been around for a long time. The Magnitsky Act (sanctions against Russia) was just another hoax in a long line of get rich and CYA under the color of law by buying protection by lining the pockets of U.S. senators and representatives.

Red Notice (A New York Times Best Seller) and The Magnitsky Act - Behind The Scenes (exposing the lies behind the passage of The Magnitsky Act) taken together, is a very large and very "red" red pill.

4
Norman_F_Dixon 4 points ago +4 / -0

Yuri Bezmenov video... timestamp at 15:34...

https://youtu.be/Y9TviIuXPSE?t=934

Cut to the audience, look just to the right of center, partially bald, tan pants, dark blue jacket, light blue shirt, dark blue tie...

Is that a younger 1984 ex-CIA Director John Brennan?

Real or a deep fake?

This same cut to audience shot with the possible young John Brennan is used again at 44:39 and again 55:34 (this last cut seems a little clearer than the first two of these particular audience cuts). Scanned the other audience cuts... NTR.

https://youtu.be/Y9TviIuXPSE?t=3334

Checked wiki for his dates of employment at the CIA... started in either 1980 or 81. Recall the Bezmenov video is from 1984... so the timeline fits.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›