Well ain't that a coincidence, Joe Biden, the pretend POTUS, is also a rapist!
Patriot Party time!
More people need to do this. Plenty of studies show that most people are too scared to act or think first. If you downvote a video/post/image/meme/etc and it gets a large majority of downvotes, it will influence others to dislike it. Likewise with upvotes and positive influence.
I can't find the study, but someone asked 2000 or so people the same political question, but showed the "results" on the voting page. Half at random were shown 92% yes and 8% no, and half vice versa. Each group was influenced HEAVILY by what they perceived as previous voters' opinions. If I find it I'll post it.
If everyone downvotes and ridicules commie, leftist BS shit online, and it ends up with a staggering ration, it WILL influence how other interpret it. More than half the population is like this I'd guess. Obviously if someone is already entrenched in their views, it's unlikely to work, but I guarantee you, casual left leaning, apolitical, and dummies who don't even know about these issues are likely to be influenced by what they think is the popular opinion. These people are afraid to think and act first and look to others for confirmation/comfort. Just make sure you use adblockers on MSM sites so as to stop them from profitting.
This is actually why so many people believe "Trump is a racists" despite the nearly all of them unaware of a single quote, action, belief, or policy he has shown that indicates such. They hear it from news, hollywood, musicians, TV, etc enough that it becomes their belief through osmosis - dems know the importance of this. The only way to influence these figuratively braindead and cowardly masses is to present them with MORE opinions to the contrary - it WILL change their mind.
There is no harm in using this tactic on these people either, as since they just want others to tell them what to think, it might as well be right.
I'm doing my part. People like to go with the crowd. If people see he is disliked more than liked, it will influence them immediately to dislike him, psychologically. Most people are afraid to use their own judgement or lead. They will sit back and wait for external influences of other people before forming certain opinions or acting. It's well researched, and if every commie bullshit video, post, image was downvoted and ridiculed heavily - I guarantee you it would convert a large percent of apolitical and casual lefties.
What I'd give to have a quarter of this man's swagger and way with words. Dear God, he should run for President someday.
So if anyone can help clue me in, it would be great. It seems Q and Jones have been in a feud of sorts, each calling the other a psyop. I don't follow either but will watch Jones occasionally and did some research on Q a while back.
I'm not sure if Q is a psyop, military intelligence, or a legit conspiracy nut larping as intelligence, who sees Alex as his direct competitor. It's hard to tell, and I haven't had the time to go through the thousands of posts by this group.
Alex Jones has redpilled a tonne of people, he's nearly always right, but looses people with his vein-bulging, clenched fist, screaming rants about vampires. Still, he has been deplatformed and censored by tech giants which has limited his reach, and is always portrayed as a nutjob, or violent nutjob, by MSM. If he is a psyop, then its the most retarded approach at a psyop I have ever heared of.
From what I understand, the last Q "drop" was like 40 days ago. There has been no mention by Q about any protest. There has been nothing since early December. So I don't understand why Alex Jones thinks Q is planning a false flag. From what I'm aware, Q people seem to think Jones is a CIA psyop or something, but I could't find anything from Q about Alex except for maybe one post about his deplatforming. Q posts all look like riddles to me, and I dont understand why they are formatted in a way that needs to be deciphered... If Q's mission is to provide information to people, doing it in a cryptographic way is counter-intuitive.
I'd have to side Q being more likely a psyop, if either is. I still don't see any evidence that Q is encouraging protests, like Alex suggests. Is there anything I am missing here?
Article claims:
The Italian National Prosecutor’s Office confirmed it ordered the arrests, and filed the charges.
Vatican City is an independent state with its own judicial system. The Italian National Prosecutor would not have the power to effect any arrests there, especially not of the Head of State.
Anyone got new link?
Of course You/tube would ban this info.
copying from another comment I made... A post from the Police Dept. involved actually say the "drug deal gone wrong" narrative is BS, with no evidence to support it.
Someone or some group had began circulating a fake report on social media, pretending to be from investigators, It claims Cannon's father, Austin Hinnant, invited Darius Sessoms, the shooter, over to buy / use drugs. The post states that the boy's father got into an alercation with Sessoms, and his son was shot by accident. It goes on further to claim the boy's family have made false claims about the incident, that Cannon's father refuses to cooperate with police, that Sessoms' claims to police line up with events and evidence, and that the state of North Carolina is attempting to shut down the Hinnant family's GoFundMe in light of these revelations. The real police dept. has released a statement confirming these social media posts are absolutely fake and have no truth to them.
So who or what group would want to manipulate the public's opinion on this case Who would do this to a family whose son just died, just because they wanted to manipulate the public's opinion to shift blame from the black shooter to the white father?? Who else would be as disgusting to say a father who lost his son is the bad guy, the shooter is the victim, while telling everyone to not contribute to the GoFundMe for this boy's funeral. If this isn't leftists BLM dipshits purposely trying to get people to write this murder off as an accident because it doesn't fit their narrative, I'd be shocked.
But you are right, BLM has verry little to do with this, an nothing to do with the murder as far as we know. I believe some bikers attended a vigil for the child, gathering money for the family. It was reported they were wearing "All Lives Matter" and "Cannon's Life Matters" shirts, which is likely where the politicization started. I'm guessing using the "_____ Lives Matter" formula pissed off BLM leftists who decided to spread fake news of the father causing his son's death while pretending to be police.
A post from the Police Dept. involved actually say the "drug deal gone wrong" narrative is BS, with no evidence to support it.
Someone or some group had began circulating a fake report on social media, pretending to be from investigators, It claims Cannon's father, Austin Hinnant, invited Darius Sessoms, the shooter, over to buy / use drugs. The post states that the boy's father got into an alercation with Sessoms, and his son was shot by accident. It goes on further to claim the boy's family have made false claims about the incident, that Cannon's father refuses to cooperate with police, that Sessoms' claims to police line up with events and evidence, and that the state of North Carolina is attempting to shut down the Hinnant family's GoFundMe in light of these revelations. The real police dept. has released a statement confirming these social media posts are absolutely fake and untrue.
So who or what group would want to manipulate the public's opinion on this case? Who would say that this kid was shot accidently by an innocent black man who was defending himself from the violent, druggy father. Who would do this to a family whose son just died, just because they wanted to manipulate the public's opinion to shift blame from the black shooter to the white father?? If this isn't leftists BLM dipshits purposely trying to get people to write this murder off as an accident because it doesn't fit their narrative, I'd be shocked.
Who else would be as disgusting to say a father who lost his son is the bad guy, the shooter is the victim, while telling everyone to not contribute to the GoFundMe for this boy's funeral. Fucking disgusting. There was one real link to drugs though - Darius Sessoms' mother believes his son was likely high when he shot the boy.
Bear with me here... So I understand this sentiment, but I thought 230 provides a lot of the freedom of the internet. Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't the first statute provide online platforms across the internet, such as, websites and their providers, immunity from liability from 3rd party users / content? This website could be sued to oblivion for remarks from any user without this protection. Every torrenting site would be buried in lawsuits - but it seems like that is the case anyways somehow.
According to wikipedia:
The statute in Section 230(c)(2) further provides "Good Samaritan" protection from civil liability for operators of interactive computer services in the removal or moderation of third-party material they deem obscene or offensive, even of constitutionally protected speech, as long as it is done in good faith.>
This is what gives sites like twitter and facebook the balls to delete anything they don't agree with. This statute being terminated would be better than the whole thing, as it would allow free speech to be protected from Jack Dorsey's need to ban, delete, hide or dispute label anyone or anything right-of-communist. At the same time, I think that would make deleting comments from shills on TD a thing of the past.
I am not an expert in law, so I could be totally wrong here. Anyone who knows better feel free to correct me. That being said, something absolutely must be done about big tech social media companies managing narratives on their platforms, deleting users who won't comply, and conspire together to deplatform people like Alex Jones. FB, twitter, reddit, etc., need to be held accountable somehow, I just don't know how.
I literally had to make an account for this. Your explanation made me more curious and even more confused. What rose are you talking about?
Perhaps the Canada Goose brand jackets. They are winter designer jackets being sold for $1000 routinely, and the most popular item of the Canada Goose line. In colder climates, these jackets are popular targets for shoplifters and thieves.