by TBTGXOR
5
NostalgicFuturist 5 points ago +5 / -0

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NnXYEelclxc

According to Dinesh D’Souza, the Nazis got their eugenics policies (in part, at least) from Margaret Sanger (Planned Parenthood founder) and other American “progressives”. Hitler was one of her fans.

Sanger advocated sterilization of the mentally and physically unfit, but didn’t go so far as to advocate euthanasia. The Nazis DID take it that further step, of course.

Today’s Democrats, like the infanticidal pediatrician Ralph Northam, have also taken that step: live-birth euthanasia of helpless infants, in the name of women’s rights. We could have seen that coming.

So beware of people calling themselves “progressive”. Murder is just around the corner.

DISCLAIMER: I’m following D’Souza because I trust him as a scholar and share his values. But I’m not a eugenics scholar or a Sanger expert, and some people disagree strongly with his claims. Take this cuck, who is a sad little cuck, but seems to have done some research to back up his TDS cuckery.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ndCu1W-DlwA

There’s a lengthy verbal battle in the comments section between this cuck and a based troller; it’s pretty entertaining.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Those CCCP t-shirts and jackets are the perfect couture for "white monkeys." (That's what the Chinese sneeringly call white apologists, flunkies and useful fools.)

Maybe also a small vest and a cute little cap with a strap, and a little tin cup, too, while organ-grinder Xi plays a Chinese tune.

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

A lot of depressed, disillusioned cucks on Reddit.

https://thedonald.win/p/GcCKpyls/reddit-on-suicide-watch-lol/

Your secretary is not the only one, not by a mile. That adds up to a lot of stay-at-homes come Nov 3, it may even be the decisive factor. (Add the second-time-around-screwed Bernie Bros., who voted 10% for Trump last time around...)

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

In law this would be called "fruit of a poisoned tree"--meaning evidence obtained illegally. Looking at you, Kamala.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

You have a choice, America: Elect two Deep State crooks, or the man who wants to put them in jail.

5
NostalgicFuturist 5 points ago +5 / -0

This would have been a joke just a few years ago. "Man, you're so depraved, you'd hold up a lemonade stand." It would be funny because so far-fetched; no one would be THAT depraved. So what used to be a joke is now the new normal.

Or: "You're so depraved you'd kill a young white mother for saying "'All lives matter.'"

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

What you can't hear in the video is that the kids had just shouted, "Get out of here, n......s, this is MAGA country." "Really, Jesse?" "Uh, yeah."

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

You may be right. But she may mature in 4 years. Or not. As far as ID politics is concerned, campaign managers have to think about how to attract votes, especially from problematic demographics (for conservatives). If the candidate is intrinsically worthy, then being strategic is excusable and just plain smart. Whether Candace is that candidate is questionable, I have to admit. She does have charisma and a sharp wit and a sense of humor and fearlessness, though.

But yeah, who out there has what Trump has, the charisma and the guts and the toughness to deal with crises, personal and national and international, plus the integrity to deliver on promises. He's once in a lifetime, several lifetimes.

It worries the hell out of me, the prospect of the Dems winning in 2024--like everyone else here. The flood gates will open on all the evil and insanity that's barely, BARELY being held in check even now.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Oh yeah, he's on fire with that Senate Judiciary Committee investigation into the Deep State/Swamp which he's of course absolutely NOT implicated in...

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

There are unfortunately few hardcore patriots who'd fight to the death for Trump and his agenda. The majority of Republicans from McConnnell on down are wishy-washy with no fire in their belly and ready to abandon Trump if that's the way the wind's blowing.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Candance Owens--a BWC, which is a powerful combination. (Black Woman Conservative). She won't be 35 till April 29 2024, though. But she could enter the race on her birthday.

EDIT: It sucks that you've got to consult an identity politics calculus like this (BWC). But if its a good candidate...

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

What can I say? You said it all. Jeff has got this compulsion to push his genius further, like his life depended on it, like he'd die if he repeated himself or got in a rut or stagnated like Clapton (as you say, and I of course admire the hell out of the younger Clapton). It's uncanny, every solo is like a new experiment in pushing the envelope, a new departure, and within that, every lick is some crazy new idea that makes your jaw drop.

That's quite a story about Beck and the Stones. He's a one-man orchestra, the very idea that he'd just be backing up Jagger, plus duking it out with Keiff...

I could only find these three on YouTube. ("Only"!) My memory's hazy, none of them has the moment I thought I remembered where Clapton just throws in the towel and admires... The first video comes closest--toward the end where he seems to be just, just, how does he do it man.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLT4JdS5rbk

Shake Your Money Maker

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9BUXsa55hg

"Little Brown Bird" and "You Need Love" (Muddy Waters, both)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SKIFrPn0m4c

Moon River

PS Oh I forgot: how about Jack Bruce on Crossroads? Maniac. (And Ginger Baker, madman.) They were high on drugs or God or the Devil or SOMETHING, but that's a Himalaya high point no group will ever get beyond.

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

OK I'm not ready to let this go yet:

There's a video of Beck and Clapton exchanging solos in friendly competition during a concert (I'm sure it's on YouTube somewhere). Anyway, they both try to outdo the other, but at one point Jeff does some riffing so amazing that Clapton just stands back, shakes his head and lets him play on...

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I've given your comment careful consideration, and my response is: FUCK YEAH

BTW: Who's the asshole who gave you a downvote? I pity the fool...

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

They also mention Joe's a pedo. Obviously there are holes in the cone of silence the MSM has tried to place over the fact that he's a senile sicko.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

The Dem ticket is now so demotivating these cucks are as much as saying they'll stay home on Nov 3. Let one LOL stand for a thousand more.

1
NostalgicFuturist 1 point ago +1 / -0

I just came across a blurb for a book I'd like to read, "From counterculture to cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the rise of digital utopianism," by Fred Turner. I'll let the blurb speak for itself in the context of this discussion:

"In the early 1960s, computers haunted the American popular imagination. Bleak tools of the cold war, they embodied the rigid organization and mechanical conformity that made the military-industrial complex possible. But by the 1990s—and the dawn of the Internet—computers started to represent a very different kind of world: a collaborative and digital utopia modeled on the communal ideals of the hippies who so vehemently rebelled against the cold war establishment in the first place. From Counterculture to Cyberculture is the first book to explore this extraordinary and ironic transformation. Fred Turner here traces the previously untold story of a highly influential group of San Francisco Bay–area entrepreneurs: Stewart Brand and the Whole Earth network. Between 1968 and 1998, via such familiar venues as the National Book Award–winning Whole Earth Catalog, the computer conferencing system known as WELL, and, ultimately, the launch of the wildly successful Wired magazine, Brand and his colleagues brokered a long-running collaboration between San Francisco flower power and the emerging technological hub of Silicon Valley. Thanks to their vision, counterculturalists and technologists alike joined together to reimagine computers as tools for personal liberation, the building of virtual and decidedly alternative communities, and the exploration of bold new social frontiers. Shedding new light on how our networked culture came to be, this fascinating book reminds us that the distance between the Grateful Dead and Google, between Ken Kesey and the computer itself, is not as great as we might think."

So the cancer of Big Tech grew in the heart of Hippiedom. Is that a paradox or was one the logical development of the other? Bitter food for thought.

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

From where we stand now, Joplin, Morrison, Hendrix, Bowie, the Stones, the Beatles--they look like giants. We have assembly-line soft-porn pop tarts. THEY could rock the planet but also had poetic imaginations, they actually explored new mental worlds. They were mostly self-indulgent as hell, including when it came to drugs, but there's even something heroic about that--in a Byronic Romantic way. And they often used psychedelics the way Terence McKenna used them--not to get high so much as to experiment and explore their minds.

When I think of, e.g., Jennifer Lopez with nothing to offer but her shaking booty, the glitzy regimented choreography to cover up the emptiness of of the music... Ah, well, I geeze, I geeze...

EDIT: You mention Heart. I saw Ann Wilson in concert, and she was damn good. But. Then. Came. JEFF BECK...

2
NostalgicFuturist 2 points ago +2 / -0

Okay, I'm really gonna let you have it over this one, as follows:

I've thought it over and: I made a careless comment, downright silly, really, and I apologize for it. You're right about pattern recognition. But I also remember something Elias Canetti wrote: "The leap into the general is so dangerous that it has to be made again and again, and from the same place." I take it that "the same place" is the awareness of the potential dangers of generalizing about people (Canetti was a Jew and I think that's part of what he had in mind). This doesn't mean we don't, or shouldn't generalize. The goal of scientific inquiry is to reach a valid generalization (e.g., a law of nature, such as the instinct to generalize). Without it we couldn't think, period. The point is to do it empirically and with awareness of the stakes.

Also, I'm a Boomer myself and ambivalent and maybe a bit defensive about the rickety old cohort I belong to. I even contradict myself in another comment here.

Anyway,

Peace, Pede.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›