What did that warming say? I can't hear what is being said.
Libertarian party seemed to be infected by leftists that just wanted to be a different form of snowflake than their commie Californian neighbors. They didn't want to be labeled "Nazi" when they slightly disagreed, so they pretended to be above it all but didn't really adhere to any libertarian philosophy.
Exactly. We aren't going to be shocked because we already know. The blatant illegal corruption is already known and out there. There is no reason to wait unless we just don't have the power to do anything about it.
It looks/feels F-in' sleek.
The only thing that's shocking me is how long is taking.
In the Podesta email leaks they talk about Rand. It's very insightful. They're basically asking each other if he's "for real." And are somewhat shocked someone on that stage isn't playing "the game," but is there trying to do the right thing. It's eye opening because apparently it's that rare of quality in dc.
Goya on the right
I got an email saying they expect Trump to sign this catastrophe.
Ah so her little tweets are just for show
I don't trust VPN's at all. "Hey look, We can monitor 300 million individuals or we can monitor 9 vpn servers."
Which way did she vote on it?
Can we get a based sheriff to make an arrest? Is this only fbi jurisdiction of something?
I like Mr Pool, despite his flaws.
I don't believe anything will happen anymore. It's been too long, nobody on the inside is fighting at all.
What kind of information would they have gotten?
I'm not one to "blame the victim," but wtf did she expect? The dude is a walking insane asylum. Even if he didn't beat her (cause I'll never just take the msm word for it), it like saying, "omygawd running into and destroying beehives was a really bad experience and who knew right? I'm retarded" stupid chick is stupid.
Yeah, but that was deep state vs deep state.
I really don't think there was a plan. The fact that Trumps biggest/only "guns" were attacking outside the system led me to believe that a while back. Trump is surrounded by traitors. Anyone that steps up on our side immediately gets attacked by the state.
Interesting. My problem with this is there might not be a "later." And we've seen too many things/evidence disappear when the doj gets involved.
You bring up good points, but the age limit is too keep help insure there are no "lifers."
I think senators should go back to being selected by the states (governor's was it?)
I really think we need other limits too. No one under 60. No one that's held public office for the last 15 years. We need people that rose up in private sector and are of the age to "give back."
Edit: speaking as someone in their 40s. So I'm not just pushing for people like me.
My reply to when that phrase is used (or something similar, like that's it's outdated) when it comes up in conversation has always been: "there's a process for that. That's what the amendments are for."
They never know how to respond to that.
Information had been dropping for 5 years. We know the crimes and conspiracies. We need action by those on power. But they aren't going to police themselves.