5
NotRealDemSocialism 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's right, you all heard that now?

Fuck around and find out

1
NotRealDemSocialism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Once more, some of those committee fucks were asleep

2
NotRealDemSocialism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Say it again for those in the back

14
NotRealDemSocialism 14 points ago +14 / -0

Exactly, tiktok serves a function. It's not because Microsoft believes it's going to make that money back, it's because they need the backdoor to keep backdooring.

And by they, I mean the people there Chinese are in conspiracy with.

Win10 is spyware too you know

30
NotRealDemSocialism 30 points ago +30 / -0

That $600 should never have existed though

2
NotRealDemSocialism 2 points ago +2 / -0

Release 20% of the population to get the one guy who won't be out in time for the op you want them to be a part of to get released.

7
NotRealDemSocialism 7 points ago +7 / -0

I love how this is always news for some

5
NotRealDemSocialism 5 points ago +6 / -1

The first one was bad, this one is worse.

Our fiat isn't going to survive 6 trillion in printed money on top of regular annual printing. 2019 saw an already insane 1 trillion deficit, so this is seven years of insane deficit packed needlessly in one year.

We brought in 3.5 trillion in revenue in 2019, so this is two years revenue pissed down the drain.

The first one was insane, a second one is suicide.

Get out of fiat. Hold metals, hold crypto.

3
NotRealDemSocialism 3 points ago +3 / -0

6 trillion extra this year

Shouldn't have been one penny

Get ready to build a new nation with a new fiat on top of the bones of the old one. Whether that new country looks like the constitutional republic of old, or the latest communist death camp purge depends entirely on how much ammunition you stockpile.

1
NotRealDemSocialism 1 point ago +1 / -0

Reminder: under socialism she receives infinite treatments while you don't pass a death panel.

1
NotRealDemSocialism 1 point ago +1 / -0

I said nothing about his self defence.

Yes, but that's ALL I was talking about. You responded:

Are you defending a convicted pedo?

Your words. In response to me saying his action was in self defense. How can you not follow a conversation that is only two comments long??

You don't pass 100, I guarantee it.

0
NotRealDemSocialism 0 points ago +1 / -1

Yes. Because I'm on the side of law and order. Of rights. Of liberty. If it only belongs to a privileged minority, it's not liberty.

What pedophiles aren't allowed to defend themselves? Gtfo. Justice comes in a court room, not from the hands of a mob, virtuous or otherwise.

2
NotRealDemSocialism 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's the mediocre that oppose the meritocracy

Understand this, and the stupid acts and predictable outcomes won't ever surprise you again.

1
NotRealDemSocialism 1 point ago +1 / -0

The NBA-run camps were meant to provide education and basketball training for local children, under Chinese government authority.

“We were basically working for the Chinese government,” stated one of the former coaches.

This is a messaging headline

22
NotRealDemSocialism 22 points ago +23 / -1

They talk about income inequality...

...how come no one ever talks about contribution inequality?

Jeff Bezos has revolutionized the way we shop and deliver goods, saving countless millions of free hours. Meanwhile they resist the urge to spit in your sandwich while deluding themselves into the belief that they're 'owed' something.

14
NotRealDemSocialism 14 points ago +14 / -0

I want an equal economy too.

One where people contribute equally. But they don't. And until they do, outcomes will likewise be unequal.

0
NotRealDemSocialism 0 points ago +2 / -2

So he's smart?

I hope I'm equally smart right before someone jumps me from behind. Still self defense.

view more: Next ›