If the filibuster is ended, sinema and Manchin are powerless as they will vote with the Dems or face blow back. Who obtains power then for 50? Susan Collins, Murkowski, etc.
Because her and Manchin lose their power if it is enacted. Right now they are “swing votes” and have “power”. With the filibuster eliminated their “power” is gone.
I don’t know half the “Q” stuff, and never even followed it. But I saw Dan post multiple videos that led people down that path. Why would be post this random video of fly-bys? Think there were 1-2 other videos also. https://twitter.com/danscavino/status/1337270838878490628?s=21
Gab is been around for a couple of years but Apple did to them what they’ve done to Parlor, removed their app from the store years ago.
Don’t see how you impeach in 10 days.
They are experiencing heavy traffic now. They said they are adding 10 new servers today.
I’ve seen people walking around. Who is vandalizing? You have video of people smashing computers or pulling down wall art?
Thing is they did. But they didn’t have the mail in portion to work with once he out paced the machine algorithm.
When was this?
Count the jet fly by...
https://twitter.com/danscavino/status/1337270838878490628?s=21
I don’t follow Q but here is another he put out last week. Count the fly by....
https://twitter.com/danscavino/status/1337270838878490628?s=21
I don’t follow Q but here is another he put out last week. Count the fly by....
https://twitter.com/danscavino/status/1337270838878490628?s=21
Fair point
What can we expect from these lawsuits? I know the Wisconsin one that made its way to the WI Supreme Court ruled partially in Trumps favor. But, like that one, what will come of these if no judge or court has the courage to do anything? Get it to the Supreme Court and HOPE they do something?
What can we expect from these lawsuits? I know the Wisconsin one that made its way to the WI Supreme Court ruled partially in Trumps favor. But, like that one, what will come of these if no judge or court has the courage to do anything?
Well, hopefully this can be presented eventually. Judges don’t won’t to touch this stuff, too scared or RINO. Everyone passing it off.
As someone with a software background and who’s job it is to write software...if this is true this isn’t a “glitch”. This would be something that was Intentionally implemented. There is no “glitch” or “bug” that would switch votes. And something at that level, an election machine, I would imagine would have been through all kinds of testing to make sure it “performs” like it is supposed to.
Here is a summary of that. He did an example and simulation so you can see it play out. The example 2 and simulation in the video describe it well. First example is kind of detailed. https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes
Here is a summary of that. He did an example and simulation so you can see it play out. The example 2 and simulation in the video describe it well. First example is kind of detailed. https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes
Here is a summary of that. He did an example and simulation so you can see it play out. The example 2 and simulation in the video describe it well. First example is kind of detailed. https://youtu.be/i1N5bn4TJes
Here is a summary of that. He did an example and simulation so you can see it play out. The example 2 and simulation in the video describe it well. First example is kind of detailed.
Don’t know why we are waiting unless “winning” is his form of thinking we will with the Supreme Court cases.
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
Example 2 and the simulation explain it well. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1N5bn4TJes
This is to try to save himself in lawsuits. “See we banned other stocks besides GME, AMC!”. “We banned Starbucks and GM.”