Who is this "they"?

Who is "they"?

If I am understanding correctly: -you are not against recognizing patterns -but you are against using pattern recognition as a basis for forming opinions of races, religions, and people?

Most people have no problem with the idea of using pattern recognition to form opinions, heuristics, and actions, but some people do have a problem with that when it's about other people. It seems to be something deeper than what might be perceived as rational decision making.

Speak English.

They be?

What about a history of deception, misdirection, parasitism, degeneracy, and usury? What perspective would that be?

Who is "they"?

Who is "They"?

The trick is to just stop caring about, talking about, or otherwise dignifying them.

"hard to watch"?

Why watch this filth at all? Might as well just eat spoonfuls of literal shit.

Generally speaking, with regard to just about anything, are you against recognizing consistent patterns?

If so, would you acknowledge such an attitude as willful ignorance or malicious disregard of reality?

Good idea. Pulled this from Wikipedia: https://jewishchronicle.timesofisrael.com/jewish-woman-welcomed-as-transgender-states-new-physician-general/

Top-tier shitpost.

Who is "they" and what are their best interests?

Wtf, literally a tranny, I thought you guys were just calling it mean names.

Wow, literally a tranny, I thought y'all were just calling her mean names.

Levine, what is the etymology of that name?

Some people choose to judge people on their individual merit, and aren't into collectivist identity politics.

"Noticing patterns is collectivist identity politics."

What reason?

Who is doing all this lying?

Henry Ford was right.

We understand. We are noticing.