4
Np956759 4 points ago +4 / -0

Is the house meeting, I can't find anything on the house reconvening?

26
Np956759 26 points ago +26 / -0

I heard they called both races for Stacy Abrams because she so fucking fat and won’t fit in just one 🤣🤣

5
Np956759 5 points ago +5 / -0

He didn’t embarrass him like he did with Mike Lee. I think that means he may have his back but isn’t advertising it yet

1
Np956759 1 point ago +1 / -0

I hope this is true and constitutionally allowed. It simultaneously takes it out of the individual gov/SOS hands and into the legislatures where it belongs. It would make the meek asshats put up and back up all their big talk

9
Np956759 9 points ago +9 / -0

He gave Rafreburger more than enough rope to hang himself and was not so subtle about it. Certainly seems like good old Brad is more than happy to do it too. All he kept saying was, “well your data is wrong” but then refused to share his data, despite many requests from the President’s team. Gotta imagine that consent decree was so that Stacy Abrams would shut her fat mouth about the Dominion cheating

2
Np956759 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep, I was totally wrong and I’ll gladly admit it

1
Np956759 1 point ago +1 / -0

Started listening to Mike a few weeks ago, really like his take in this. Though his last couple episodes where he talks about the China virus vaccine are positively terrifying

1
Np956759 1 point ago +1 / -0

Have you seen his videos on YouTube he seems rather thorough. Once again I don’t know much about statistics, I’m more of a language and literature guy. I ask not because I’m question you only that maybe he didn’t go into much detail in the hearing for the sake of getting info out in an expeditious fashion. Definitely interested in your take

1
Np956759 1 point ago +1 / -0

What’s wrong with Dr. Shiva’s statistical analysis? Genuinely asking because statistics are not my forte

3
Np956759 3 points ago +3 / -0

Beaynard, Dr. Shiva, and the next guy (the financial advisor) blew me away. Buddy at work and I very well informed on what is going on but the way they presented the numbers still blew us away

2
Np956759 2 points ago +2 / -0

I’d prefer CIA so he can shatter it into a million pieces and spread it into the winds of history

2
Np956759 2 points ago +2 / -0

Here we go with the unnamed sources again. This is definitely fake news, move along and focus on what’s important and that is winning this election

2
Np956759 2 points ago +2 / -0

I have two signs and a flag and they aren’t coming down anytime soon

2
Np956759 2 points ago +2 / -0

All the big Def counties are in, lots of Red left. Don't worry we got TX

8
Np956759 8 points ago +8 / -0

I voted last Tuesday, waited an hour but cast my vote. Wife voted this morning, rest of my family voted last week. I’ve been asking everybody at work if they voted yet. Let’s win this!!!!

1
Np956759 1 point ago +1 / -0

Because of the Q phenomenon that popular on social media. I’m not weighing in one way or another, people are just making a joke that Tony is Q, that is all

2
Np956759 2 points ago +2 / -0

Is that really the number? That's insane considering that the average number that vote in a presidential election is usually around 130mil. This is craziness

view more: Next ›