Matt Braynard
https://twitter.com/MattBraynard
https://www.gofundme.com/f/voter-fraud-detection-az-ga-mi-nc-nv-pa-wi
My previous post about what everyone here can do to help:
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKgiMn2/
People in his twitter comments are volunteering. People in my previous thread are volunteering. Let's get everyone on the same page.
The White House Matt Braynard TheDonald
We need to get the information flowing between these three groups.
4chan has their gems but we probably want to keep them at arms length.
https://thedonald.win/u/LAlilli/ - has offered to help coordinate here on this site.
https://twitter.com/Kevin90772697 -
More help from Matt's twitter responses.
https://twitter.com/Kevin90772697/status/1324739167625109504:
"Once you get your data set, post it to get up and get a collaboration of developers. I know myself and many others like me would be more than happy to volunteer our time to assist. I’ve been putting together data frames looking at different scenarios and identifying outliers"
Many others in the twitter responses that I haven't archived here.
Please get in touch with these people and try to get some sort of chat server setup for everyone.
My pleasure.
I am a new poster and it would be best for someone who is a long time poster to step up and volunteer to act a the official Fraud Team Leader - manage the threads, control a centralized chat server(Discord?) for people who participate. Someone everyone here can trust.
Also, it is very well might be the case that the Democrats are not getting their magical additional Biden mail in ballots from this method.
There is more evidence that the Democrats are paying people to harvest ballots for cash and then back dating these otherwise late ballots.
If the later is the case, Trump is going to have a very hard time of coming up with clear proof of fraud.
One would not start grinding through the entire US ballot mail records.
First, one would focus on states and counties that already showing signs of fraud or irregularities.
Second, for the large number of magically appearing Biden mail votes that keep appearing, a much smaller statistically significant random sample would almost certainly turn up evidence in a much, much short amount of time.
Once there is that evidence is made public, it should not matter how long it would take to do a complete mail record check.
Trump supporters are posting on mainstream forums and social media claims like;
"Biden's numbers violate Benford's law"
These posts are immediately getting shut down by knowledgeable people and large numbers of non-Trump supporters are giving the impression that any mention of Benford's law is lunatic sour grapes.
What matters is making visible the differences in the graphs of Biden versus all other candidates. Making isolated claims about Biden's numbers and Benford's law is doing more damage than good.
There could be many reasons legitimate Biden's numbers violate Benford's law. There is absolutely no reasons why only Biden's numbers do so.
I agree and disagree.
Benford's law is too specific for what is going on here. Benford's law is just one of many ways for data to show signs of fraud. What is fundamentally important is Biden's data is showing clear characteristics that none of the other candidates are. It could be just Benford's law, it could be other forms of human intervention where they are doing a bad job of spreading excess vote counts around because humans are terrible at faking random sequences, or combinations of these, or something else.
All that matters is getting the evidence out that Biden's numbers in battleground states are showing fraudulent characteristics that NONE of the other candidates are.
The completely different characteristic of Biden's numbers versus the other candidates.
And not the isolated claim that Biden's numbers violate Benford's law.
One doesn't even need to understand Benford's law to see that there is something very wrong with what is going on with Biden's numbers.
What is important is the extreme difference in the characteristics of Biden's numbers versus ALL of the other candidates.
It is more important to put effort into making those differences as visible as possible than putting effort into proving Benford law type violations.
There can be legitimate reasons why the data would violate Benford's law that are not fraud.
There is no legitimate reason for one candidates numbers have different fundamental data characteristics.
There are many more tools beyond Benford's law that indicate fraud. Showing Biden's numbers violate or show signs of those additionally versus the other candidates would be more useful.
More of the same on zerohedge.com:
I'm out.
The front page is filled with garbage posts like:
https://thedonald.win/p/11PpKfb4Su/joe-biden-defies-physics-turns-a/c/
3800 upvotes
Enjoy Biden's inauguration while you site here posting and upvoting memes.